Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 56(6): 1111-8, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18474377

ABSTRACT

To answer the requirement of the European Commission's Water Framework Directive (WFD) for biological-effects endpoints to classify the ecological health of aquatic ecosystems, we propose the biomarker response index (BRI). The BRI, based on a suite of biomarkers at different levels of biological response at the individual level, provides an integrated relative measure of the general health status of coastal invertebrates. Using the BRI, the health of mussels (Mytilus edulis) from 10 estuaries classified by the Environment Agency of England and Wales under the WFD was compared. Eight sites were healthier than predicted and two showed a similar health status to that of the predicted point-source pollution risk classification. Results indicate that the BRI offers a potential measure of organism health that can be used in monitoring under the WFD as an additional aid to reduce uncertainty in defining risk classification and to provide better evidence of existing impact.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Risk Assessment/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , England , Female , Fertility , Mytilus edulis/drug effects , Organic Chemicals , Pesticides , Public Health , Public Policy , Wales
2.
Integr Environ Assess Manag ; 2(4): 312-29, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17069174

ABSTRACT

The introduction of the European Commission's Water Framework Directive (WFD; 2000/60/EC) established a new era in environmental risk assessment. In addition to incorporating the compliance of chemical quality standards, the key objective of the WFD is the general protection of the aquatic environment in its entirety. This new approach emphasizes the need for an integrated environmental risk assessment and offers the potential for the incorporation of biological effects measures, including the use of biomarkers in this process. Biomarkers have been suggested as practical tools for environmental management for a number of decades, but their inclusion has not been universally accepted because of a number of unanswered questions regarding sensitivity, practicality, and reproducibility. With this in mind, this paper addresses these potential questions and shows how, by taking a weight-of-evidence approach, biomarkers may be successfully incorporated within environmental risk assessment frameworks such as the WFD.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , Environmental Health , Environmental Monitoring , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Risk Assessment/methods , Environmental Pollutants/adverse effects , Humans , Risk Management , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...