The Effect of Alexithymia, Attention, and Pain Characteristics on Mentalizing Abilities Among Adults With Chronic Pain.

Introduction: Impaired mentalizing abilities are found among persons with chronic pain, yet it is still unknown why. The current study focuses on mentalizing abilities and how these could be affected by different pain factors, alexithymia traits, and other aspects of psychological functioning (depression, anxiety, attention) in persons experiencing chronic pain.Methods: 71 participants (80.3% female; mean age 56.1 (SD = 13.1)) with subjectively reported chronic pain conditions participated in the study. Mentalizing abilities were assessed using an objective assessment of the Frith-Happé animations test. Alexithymia was measured using Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Subjectively reported data on various pain characteristics and other related psychological factors (depression, anxiety, attention) were collected. Bivariate linear regression analyses were used to identify variables that had statistically significant relationships with Frith-Happé test scores as dependent variables, which were then used to build multivariate models.Results: Mentalization task scores had no significant associations with alexithymia. However, in bivariate models, greater Frith-Happé animations categorisation score was associated with higher attention task scores (ßs = .332, p = .005), higher education (ßs = .317, p = .007), and lower level of depressiveness (ßs = -.234, p = .049). Greater animations feelings scores were associated with less severe pain intensity (ßs = -.322, p = .006), younger age (ßs = -.399, p = .001), and better attention (ßs = .383, p = .001). In multivariate analysis models predicting both animations categorisation and feelings scores, attention was found to be the only statistically significant factor (respectively, ßs = .257, p = .029 and ßs = .264, p = .035).Conclusions: No significant correlations were found between mentalizing abilities and alexithymic features in persons with chronic pain. Disruptions of attention was the most significant factor leading to lower mentalizing abilities in persons with chronic pain.

Choice of approach, but not femoral head size, affects revision rate due to dislocations in THA after femoral neck fracture: results from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register.

PURPOSE: Hip dislocation after arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures (FNF) remains a serious complication. The aim of our study was to investigate FNF patients treated with THA, with a special focus of comparing the effect of surgical approach and femoral head size on the risk of revision for dislocation. METHODS: Data were derived from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register, and we calculated the cumulative revision rates after surgery. For survival analysis, we used revision due to dislocation as an end-point. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the influence of various covariates (age, gender, femoral head size, surgical approach). RESULTS: A total of 8,813 primary THAs were registered from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013, of which 1,412 were due to FNF: 899 involved 28-mm femoral heads and the remaining 513 received 32-mm heads. The posterior approach was used in 1,156 cases and the anterolateral approach in 256.. At the end of the follow-up period, 74 hips had been revised for recurrent dislocation. Cox regression adjusting for age, gender and head size showed that the posterior approach had 2.3-times [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-5.0, p = 0.04] greater risk of revision for dislocation CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in order to reduce the early dislocation rate in FNF patients treated with THA, it is more effective to use the anterolateral approach than it is to select a femoral head size of 32 mm instead of 28 mm.

First outcome results after total knee and hip replacement from the Lithuanian arthroplasty register.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In 2010, the Lithuanian Association of Arhtroplasty was established and on January 1, 2011, initiated a national study of all reoperations after total knee (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) in Lithuania. The aim of the study was to investigate the revision rates after TKR and THR at two years follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lithuanian patients undergoing primary TKR and THR from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012, were included in the study. The patient, surgery and prosthetic implantation data were collected via internet database. For reoperations we recorded the reason and type of revision, primary implantation date. We analyzed implant survival rates using any revision as an endpoint on included primary procedures, performed until September 1, 2013. RESULTS: The completeness of the register verified with state patients fund data reached 85% of all replacements. Out of 3823 primary TKR during the study period 25 revisions were performed with overall implant survival rate 99%. The main reason for knee revision was infections. During the inclusion period we registered 6072 primary THR and 149 revisions with overall implant survival rate 97%. Recurrent dislocation of prosthetic component was the main reason for hip revision. Significantly inferior survival results for femoral neck fracture patients were observed as compared with patients operated for osteoarthritis. Posterior approach as compared to others significantly affected inferior implant survival rates for femoral neck fracture patients. CONCLUSIONS: The overall survival after total knee and hip replacements revealed a high treatment quality of this surgery in Lithuania.