Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 40(6): 563-6, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17637686

ABSTRACT

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) viremia, as detected by polymerase chain amplification, occurs in approximately half of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. The significance of such viremia is incompletely understood, but HHV-6 encephalitis and bone marrow suppression are increasingly being recognized in patients with high viral DNA. We report two patients in whom donor-to-recipient transmission occurred through hematopoietic transplant by means of chromosomally integrated (CI) HHV-6. Iatrogenic transmission manifested at engraftment as asymptomatic elevation of HHV-6 viral DNA of 3600 and 15 400 DNA copies/ml in plasma and 6.1 x 10(6) and 9.7 x 10(5) DNA copies/ml in the whole blood. Both donors had elevated plasma HHV-6 PCR at 5.6 x 10(4) and 1.3 x 10(5) DNA copies/ml and strikingly elevated whole blood HHV-6 levels at 4.1 x 10(6) and 4.7 x 10(6) DNA copies/ml, respectively. CI of the virus was traced to the mother of one patient and his donor. CI of HHV-6 may confound the interpretation of HHV-6 viremia after stem cell transplantation; consideration of the possibility of CI HHV-6 will avoid unnecessary antiviral therapy.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Herpesvirus 6, Human/genetics , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Roseolovirus Infections/transmission , Roseolovirus Infections/virology , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , DNA, Viral/blood , Herpesvirus 6, Human/immunology , Herpesvirus 6, Human/isolation & purification , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Tissue Donors , Transplantation, Homologous , Virus Integration
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 42(7): 3336-8, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15243110

ABSTRACT

PCR-restriction endonuclease analysis (PRA) was used for direct identification of Mycobacterium haemophilum in clinical specimens from immunocompromised patients. PRA correctly identified M. haemophilum in four smear-positive specimens. Direct identification by PRA takes 2 to 3 working days compared to the 3 to 5 weeks required for culture isolation and identification by conventional methods.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium haemophilum/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Skin/microbiology , DNA Restriction Enzymes/pharmacology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Skin/injuries
5.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 88(7): 861-3, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15205225

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a new infectious disease that caused a global outbreak in 2003. Research has shown that it is caused by a novel coronavirus. A series of cases is reported where polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on tears had demonstrated the presence of the virus. Detection of ocular infection from tears using the PCR technique has been widely used by ophthalmologists to diagnose infections for other viruses. METHODS: This is a case series report from cases classified as probable or suspect SARS cases. Tear samples were collected from 36 consecutive patients who were suspected of having SARS in Singapore over a period of 12 days (7-18 April 2003), and analysed by PCR using protocols developed by the WHO network of laboratories. RESULTS: Three patients with probable SARS (one female and two male patients) had positive results from their tear samples. Tear samples were used to confirm SARS in the female patient, who was positive only from her tears. The positive specimens were found in cases sampled early in their course of infection. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case series reported with the detection of the SARS coronavirus from tears, and has important implications for the practice of ophthalmology and medicine. The ability to detect and isolate the virus in the early phase of the disease may be an important diagnostic tool for future patients and tear sampling is both simple and easily repeatable. Many healthcare workers are in close proximity to the eyes of patients and this may be a source of spread among healthcare workers and inoculating patients. Ophthalmic practices may need to change as more stringent barrier methods, appropriate quarantine, and isolation measures are vital when managing patients with SARS.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/virology , Tears/virology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
7.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 128(20): 1109-14, 2003 May 16.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12748900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In February 2003, a newly emerged infectious disease was described, the etiology of which was initially unknown. It is referred to under the term SARS. In the beginning, it spread in some regions South-East Asia. Import infections appeared in many other parts of the world. Based on the first cases in Germany, this report illustrates the clinical appearance, the diagnostic results and the management of this new disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed the data of two patients with SARS and one suspected patient. The results of radiological, laboratory, microbiological and physical examinations were abstracted and compared with the data obtained in other regions. RESULTS: Two of the three patients under our care developed SARS disease. This is characterised by fever of sudden onset lasting for more than 5 days, rapidly changing consolidations in chest x-ray not affected by antimicrobial therapy, leuko-, lympho- as well as thrombopenia with a compromised pulmonary function later in the course. Close contacts with SARS patients does not regularly result in full development of the disease. Secretion of a coronavirus could be detected in respiratory samples during the febrile phase and in feces for a longer time. It is still an open question whether bedrest and antibiotic prophylaxis by themselves or an additional administration of ribavirin and corticosteroids can improve the outcome. CONCLUSION: SARS is a new and highly contagious lung disease. It is crucial to be able to recognize the clinical appearance and the diagnostic features of this disease at an early stage, in order to prevent a further dissemination of the disease.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Bed Rest , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/virology , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Cough , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fever , Germany , Headache , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Isolation , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Radiography, Thoracic , Singapore/ethnology , Sputum/virology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Travel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...