Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Ophthalmol Rep ; 2(4): 142-149, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25478306

ABSTRACT

The current understanding of what infants see varies greatly among healthcare and education specialists. Even among ophthalmologists and pediatric neurologists in charge of clinical examinations of infants, opinions vary on what infants perceive, recognize, and use for communication and learning. It is, therefore, of interest to review publications from several specialties to learn whether new information is available on the development of visual functions and use of vision. Ten percent of total publications on this subject are reviewed here based on the usefulness of their content for improving early diagnosis and intervention of vision disorders in infants.

2.
Early Hum Dev ; 88(8): 669-75, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22381046

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neonatal brain injuries are the main cause of visual deficit produced by damage to posterior visual pathways. While there are several studies of visual function in low-risk preterm infants or older children with brain injuries, research in children of early age is lacking. AIM: To assess several aspects of visual function in preterm infants with brain injuries and to compare them with another group of low-risk preterm infants of the same age. STUDY DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Forty-eight preterm infants with brain injuries and 56 low-risk preterm infants. OUTCOME MEASURES: The ML Leonhardt Battery of Optotypes was used to assess visual functions. This test was previously validated at a post-menstrual age of 40 weeks in newborns and at 30-plus weeks in preterm infants. RESULTS: The group of preterm infants with brain lesions showed a delayed pattern of visual functions in alertness, fixation, visual attention and tracking behavior compared to infants in the healthy preterm group. The differences between both groups, in the visual behaviors analyzed were around 30%. These visual functions could be identified from the first weeks of life. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the importance of using a straightforward screening test with preterm infants in order to assess altered visual function, especially in infants with brain injuries. The findings also highlight the need to provide visual stimulation very early on in life.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/epidemiology , Infant, Premature, Diseases/epidemiology , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Male , Vision Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...