ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the findings of the Useful Field of View (UFOV) test with those of conventional neuropsychologic tests to determine the utility of the UFOV test as a measure of attention in a population with brain injury. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Freestanding rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen inpatients with severe brain injury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: UFOV test, FIM\T instrument, length of stay (LOS), and standard neuropsychologic testing. RESULTS: The UFOV subtest UF2 correlated strongly with the other 2 subtests, UF1 and UF3. The UF2 subtest correlated most strongly with paper and pencil tests of visual attention. The UF2 predicted 52% of the FIM change and 60% of the LOS variance, second only to admission FIM score, which predicted 75% and 80% of FIM change and LOS variance, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients in our study, the UFOV test can be used to determine the visual divided attention of patients with acquired brain injury. The results also showed that the UFOV test correlated with LOS and FIM change in patients with acquired brain injury recovering in a rehabilitation facility. Because the UFOV test is much more quickly administered and scored than other measures of attention and divided attention, these results suggest that the UFOV test may provide an easy means to measure a critical variable in the population with head injury.
Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Cognition Disorders/physiopathology , Neuropsychological Tests , Visual Fields/physiology , Adult , Aged , Brain Injuries/complications , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To report the ability of 12 tracheostomized acute rehabilitation hospital inpatients with severely disordered consciousness post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) to participate in an objective swallowing assessment. RESEARCH DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from a larger, prospective blinded comparison study. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Subjects completed a modified barium swallow (MBS) study. Food/drink and tracheostomy tube management recommendations were made. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: All subjects participated successfully during an MBS. Post-MBS, 10 subjects began receiving small amounts of food and/or drink. Prior to hospital discharge, all subjects received some food and/or drink and were extubated. Subjects were deemed representative of this patient population and, from a swallowing perspective, other tracheostomized patient populations at the same facility. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should routinely consider tracheostomized, acute rehabilitation hospital inpatients with severely disordered consciousness post-TBI potential MBS candidates. Implications and continued research needs are discussed.
