ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Proponents of carotid angioplasty and stenting suggest that "high risk" patients, defined as patients excluded from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS), may have a significantly higher risk of stroke with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, this selected patient cohort has been poorly studied. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent CEA during a 2-year period at a tertiary referral institution was performed. Each patient was evaluated and categorized, according to the exclusion criteria, by NASCET and ACAS standards. Statistical analysis using chi(2) and Fisher exact tests was performed. RESULTS: There were 366 CEAs performed on 348 patients, including 32 (8.7%) for recurrent stenosis. A subgroup of 169 (46.2%) patients were trial ineligible. Focal ipsilateral symptoms were present in 148 (40.4%) of the patients. There were 9 (2.5%) strokes and 1 (0.3%) death, secondary to a major stroke, for an overall stroke and death rate of 2.5%. Trial-eligible patients had a stroke/death rate of 1.5% (3/197) while trial-ineligible patients had a 3.6% (6/169) stroke/death rate (P = .17). CONCLUSION: Patients who were considered high risk for CEA as defined by trial ineligibility were common, comprising approximately half of our patients. Although trial-ineligible patients had a nonsignificant trend toward higher neurologic morbidity when compared with the eligible group, the risks were still comparable with NASCET/ACAS results. CEA was a safe procedure even in this "high risk" group. As such, ineligibility for a randomized carotid intervention trial should not be employed as a "de novo" indication for carotid stenting.
Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Endarterectomy, Carotid/adverse effects , Patient Selection , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stroke/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty/adverse effects , Carotid Stenosis/classification , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Louisiana/epidemiology , Male , Morbidity , Recurrence , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stents/adverse effects , Stroke/mortality , Treatment Outcome , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
The recent and continuing developments in radiotherapy, gene therapy, and the technologies of imaging, materials, and devices, as well as the techniques for their implementation, have expanded the options available for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease. Though long-term data are still lacking, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has developed into a treatment modality in its own right and continues to be an adjuvant treatment to traditional surgical revascularization. Numerous stents and grafts are currently available for the treatment of arterial lesions and aneurysms, while the testing of many more continues. In addition to these new devices, developments in gene therapy and brachytherapy have brought several new minimally invasive options to the treatment of peripheral vascular disease.
