Heart rate variability-based prediction of early cardiotoxicity in breast-cancer patients treated with anthracyclines and trastuzumab.

BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxicity is a recognized complication in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing chemotherapy with anthracyclines with or without trastuzumab. However, the prognostic value of heart rate variability (HRV) indexes for early cardiotoxicity development remains unknown. METHODS: Fifty BC patients underwent TTE assessment before and three months after chemotherapy. HRV indexes were obtained from continuous electrocardiograms in supine position with spontaneous breathing, active standing, and supine position with controlled breathing. The magnitude of change (Δ) between supine-standing and supine-controlled breathing was calculated. Variables were compared using t-test or ANOVA. Cardiotoxicity predictive value was assessed by ROC curve analysis. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: TTE revealed reduced left atrial conduit strain in the cardiotoxicity group. Mean heart rate increased during all maneuvers at follow-up, with no differences in HRV indexes between patients with or without cardiotoxicity. However, a lower Δ in supine-controlled breathing of several HRV indexes predicted early cardiotoxicity identified by echocardiography (e.g. SDNN ≤ -8.44 ms: Sensitivity = 75%, Specificity = 69%). CONCLUSIONS: BC patients treated with chemotherapy maintain cardiac autonomic responses to physiological stimuli after 3 months of chemotherapy. However, a lower Δ during active standing and controlled breathing before chemotherapy may predict early cardiotoxicity.

Individualized Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Mexico City Municipality during the First Six Waves of the Pandemic.

After COVID-19 emerged, alternative methods to laboratory tests for the individualized prediction of SARS-CoV-2 were developed in several world regions. The objective of this investigation was to develop models for the individualized prediction of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large municipality of Mexico. The study included data from 36,949 patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection who received a diagnostic tested at health centers of the Alvaro Obregon Jurisdiction in Mexico City registered in the Epidemiological Surveillance System for Viral Respiratory Diseases (SISVER-SINAVE). The variables that were different between a positive test and a negative test were used to generate multivariate binary logistic regression models. There was a large variation in the prediction variables for the models of different pandemic waves. The models obtained an overall accuracy of 73% (63-82%), sensitivity of 52% (18-71%), and specificity of 84% (71-92%). In conclusion, the individualized prediction models of a positive COVID-19 test based on SISVER-SINAVE data had good performance. The large variation in the prediction variables for the models of different pandemic waves highlights the continuous change in the factors that influence the spread of COVID-19. These prediction models could be applied in early case identification strategies, especially in vulnerable populations.

Neurocognitive Function with Conventional Hemodialysis versus Post-Dilution Hemofiltration as Initial Treatment in ESKD Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial - The DA-VINCI Study.

INTRODUCTION: The ideal modality choice and dialysis prescription during the first renal replacement therapy (RRT) session remain unclear. We conducted a pilot study to determine the safety risk for hemodialysis (HD) versus hemofiltration (HF) and its relationship with neurocognitive assessment on incident RRT patients. METHODS: Twenty-four incident RRT patients were included. Patients were randomized to the conventional HD group or post-dilution HF group. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) tests were applied in all patients before and after session, and brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) was performed in 7 patients from the conventional HD group and 8 patients from the post-dilution HF group before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared to conventional HD, post-dilution HF had longer treatment time. There were no significant changes in blood pressure after RRT in both groups. The MMSE test showed no significant differences between groups or within groups. The MOCA test showed an increase in the total score for the post-dilution HF group with no significant changes between groups. The MRI evaluation showed no differences between or within groups. CONCLUSION: Post-dilution HF is a safe alternative for the first HD session in incident RRT; it allows longer treatment time if ultrafiltration is required and has a similar neurological risk than conventional HD. This is a pilot study and that larger studies are needed to confirm the findings.

Evidencia psicométrica del Cuestionario sobre la Salud del Paciente (PHQ-9) y Escala de Ansiedad Generalizada (GAD-7) en pacientes con asesoramiento genético en Oncología / Psychometric evidence of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Scale (GAD-7) in patients with genetic counseling in Oncology

Introducción: Los síntomas de depresión y ansiedad en pacientes que reciben Asesoramiento Genético en Oncología (AGO), se encuentran dentro de las afectaciones psicológicas más prevalentes, por lo que su identificación de forma oportuna, valida y confiable es prioritaria. Objetivo: Determinar las propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario sobre la Salud del Paciente, PHQ-9, y de la Escala de Ansiedad Generalizada, GAD-7, en pacientes con cáncer portadores de variantes patogénicas germinales en genes de alta susceptibilidad. Método: Se empleó un diseño instrumental, transversal con un muestreo no probabilístico. Se incluyeron 163 participantes con variantes patogénicas en BRCA1/BRCA2, asociadas a cáncer hereditario, entre 19 y 79 años, (48,2 ± 11,2 años). Resultados: La validez de constructo de cada instrumento se probó a través de un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. La GAD-7 obtuvo un α = 0,899 y 62,3 % de la varianza explicada, por otro lado, el PHQ- 9 obtuvo un α = 0,896 y 54,8 % de la varianza explicada. El análisis factorial confirmatorio sugiere que los modelos teóricos de ambos instrumentos se ajustan a un solo factor, con una consistencia e índices de validez adecuados. Discusión y conclusión: El PHQ-9 y la GAD-7 son instrumentos parsimoniosos, breves, válidos y confiables para la detección de síntomas de depresión y ansiedad en pacientes que reciben AGO, en población mexicana. Se recomienda su uso en la atención clínica (al inicio, y durante el seguimiento), así como en investigaciones futuras (AU)

Introduction: The symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients receiving Genetic Counseling in Oncology (AGO) are among the most prevalent psychological affectations, so their timely, valid, and reliable identification is a priority. Objective: To determine the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9, and the Generalized Anxiety Scale, GAD-7, in cancer patients carrying germinal pathogenic variants in high susceptibility genes. Method: An instrumental, cross-sectional design was used with a non-probabilistic sampling. 163 participants with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/BRCA2, associated with hereditary cancer, between 19 and 79 years (48.2 ± 11.2 years) were included. Statistical analysis: The construct validity of each instrument was tested through an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The GAD-7 obtained α = 0.899 and 62.3% of the explained variance, on the other hand, the PHQ-9 obtained α = 0.896 and 54.8% of the explained variance. Confirmatory factor analysis suggests that the theoretical models of both instruments fit a single factor, with adequate consistency and validity indices. Discussion and conclusion: The PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 are parsimonious, brief, valid and reliable instruments for the detection of symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients receiving AGO, in the Mexican population. Its use is recommended in clinical care (at baseline, and during follow-up), as well as in future research (AU)

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Oswestry disability index for Mexican population.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to adapt a Spanish translation of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) into a cross-cultural version for the Mexican population. The objectives were to verify the validity and reliability of the adapted ODI and to compare pain perception between patients with and without obesity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 102 patients with low back pain from two neurosurgery departments in Mexico. The ODI questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted. Validity and construct were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis, and the external convergent validity was assessed by correlating ODI scores with pain intensity, age, and obesity. Test-retest reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and confirmatory analysis was employed to validate the factorial structure. RESULTS: Patients with obesity were older and had higher pain scores than patients without obesity. The exploratory analysis of the ODI in Mexican Spanish showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.923) and validity (factorial loading range, 0.681 - 0.818). The confirmatory analysis showed almost null or very low discrepancy between the proposed model and the real data. CONCLUSIONS: A Spanish translation of ODI was cross-culturally adapted for the Mexican population. The Mexican version of the ODI showed good reliability and validity in Mexican culture.

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a widely used tool to measure physical disability in daily activities due to low back pain.A Spanish-language version has not been culturally adapted and validated for Mexican habits and lifestyle.This study describes the process of the Spanish ODI translation and cultural adaptation, showing it is a reliable and valid tool for assessing disability in patients with low back pain, with a good factorial structure.

Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Combined with the Resilience Model to Decrease Depression and Anxiety Symptoms and Increase the Quality of Life in ESRD Patients Treated with Hemodialysis.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of cognitive behavioral intervention (CBI) combined with the resilience model (CBI + R) vs CBI alone on depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and quality of life of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis replacement therapy. METHOD: Fifty-three subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The control group (n = 25) was provided with treatment strategies based on a cognitive behavioral approach, while the experimental group (n = 28) were given the same techniques plus resilience model strategies. Five psychological instruments were applied: Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Mexican Resilience Scale, cognitive distortions scale, and the Kidney Disease related Quality of Life questionnaire. Participants were assessed at baseline (before treatment), eight weeks later (end of treatment), and four weeks after the end of treatment (follow up). The results were analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures with a Bonferroni-adjusted test method, with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: The experimental group had significant differences in total and somatic depression as well as differences in the dimensions of cognitive distortions and a significant increase in the dimensions of resilience. The control group had significant differences in all variables but showed lower scores in the evaluated times. CONCLUSIONS: The resilience model strengthens and enhances the effectiveness of the cognitive behavioral approach to reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with ESRD.

Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients.

Hypertension in Mexico has a prevalence of 32% and is the second most widespread cause of consultation in primary care. Only 40% of patients in treatment have a blood pressure (BP) below 140/90 mmHg. This clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of the combination of enalapril and nifedipine versus the empirical treatment for hypertension in patients with uncontrolled BP in a primary care center in Mexico City. Participants were randomized to treatment with enalapril and nifedipine (combination group) or to continue with the empirical treatment. Outcome variables were BP control, therapeutic adherence, and adverse effects at 6 months of follow-up. At the end of the follow-up period, BP control (64% versus 77%) and therapeutic adherence (53% versus 93%) showed an improvement from the baseline values in the group that received the combination treatment. BP control (51% versus 47%) and therapeutic adherence (64% versus 59%) in the group who received the empirical treatment did not show improvement from the baseline to follow-up. Combined treatment was 31% more efficacious than conventional empirical treatment (odds ratio = 3.9), which yielded an incremental clinical utility of 18% with high tolerability extent among patients in primary care in Mexico City. These results contribute to the control of arterial hypertension.

Detection of psychosocial distress in cancer patients: A survey of Mexican oncologists.

Purpose: Identification of patients' distress is relevant for an on-time referral to psychosocial treatment. The objective was to assess the implementation of the guidelines for distress managing in Mexican oncologists based on the NCCN guidelines.Design: The study was non-experimental and cross-sectional.Sample: Two hundred thirty-one oncologists participated with an average age of 38 ± 11 years.Methods: The likelihood of distress assessment was quantitatively evaluated.Findings: A high percentage of oncologists knew and used procedures to assess psychosocial discomfort. However, a smaller percentage used a valid and reliable instrument. Factors associated with performing distress identification procedures were knowing the distress guidelines and lack of time. Factors for questionnaire usage are the availability of brief instruments and the percentage of patients suffering from stress.Implications for Psychosocial Providers: Psychosocial providers should develop strategies to educate and ensure that oncologists are familiar with guidelines on distress in oncology. More dissemination of screening procedures and referral to psychosocial programs in oncology is required. Integrating a distress screening program involving psychosocial providers and oncologists should be approached as a routine in high-quality cancer care, to reduce the stigma associated with mental health services.

Gender-Specific Differences in Self-Care, Treatment-Related Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients.

Gender and sex differences affect women with kidney failure (KF) negatively at all stages of the disease. This study assessed gender differences in self-care, hemodialysis symptoms, and quality of life in a sample of 102 adult KF patients treated with hemodialysis, from two clinical centers in Mexico. Self-care agency, quality of life, and the symptoms related to hemodialysis were evaluated through questionnaires, and sociodemographic and laboratory variables were obtained from the clinical records. Compared to male patients, female patients reported similar self-care, lower quality of life subscales (symptoms, physical functioning, pain, and overall health), and higher prevalence and intensity of hemodialysis symptoms. There were gender differences regarding the correlation between self-care and quality of life, symptoms intensity, and symptoms prevalence. In conclusion, women with KF treated with hemodialysis perceived a higher impact of hemodialysis and reported a lower quality of life than men. Despite having a similar self-care agency, the self-care correlations with quality of life and hemodialysis symptoms appeared different between men and women treated with chronic hemodialysis. Such differences may be important in future nursing interventions to improve self-care and quality of life among KF patients.

Resilience: A Protective Factor from Depression and Anxiety in Mexican Dialysis Patients.

Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent psychological disorders in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) that have a negative clinical impact. The purpose of our study was to identify factors associated with the presence of depression and anxiety, in a sample of ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis. We included 187 patients from two dialysis facilities, age 18-65 years. Beck's depression and anxiety inventories, KDQOL36 questionnaire, the cognitive distortion scale and the Mexican scale of resilience were used. Socio-demographic and clinical information was obtained from medical records. Depression was present in 143 (76.4%) patients. Patient with depression were older (33 (26-52) years vs. 30 (24.43) years, p = 0.025), had a lower education level (36% vs. 9%, p = 0.001), used more medications (67% vs. 36%, p = 0.001), had a comorbidity (75% vs. 41%, p = 0.001), and a higher proportion were waiting for a kidney transplant. Anxiety was present in 112 (59.8%) cases. By multivariate analysis, depression was independently associated with lower education, absence of previous kidney transplant, anxiety, higher cognitive distortion, lower psychological resilience, and lower quality of life scores. In conclusion, lower psychological resilience, lower education level, and higher cognitive distortions are factors associated with depression and anxiety in ESRD patients.

Efficacy of an intervention program to prevent patient safety indicators in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: Patient safety indicators (PSI) are a set of potentially preventable events related to patient safety and opportunities for improvement. Eight pertinent PSI have been identified in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (ASAH), such as decubitus ulcer, and central line-related bacteraemia. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of a health care quality protocol to prevent the appearance of PSI in ASAH patients. METHODS: Adult patients treated for ASAH were included in a retrospective control group of 35 patients and a prospective experimental group of 35 patients when the prevention program was implemented. We evaluated the occurrence of PSI, and its relation to age, sex, Hunt and Hess scale grade, type of aneurysm treatment, length of hospital stay, and Glasgow Outcome Scale scores. RESULTS: Both groups had similar characteristics except for a longer hospital stay in the control group. The overall PSI prevalence decreased significantly in the experimental group compared to the control group. The experimental group had a decreased risk for having at least one PSI: OR = 0.21 (0.08-0.57, CI 95%). The absolute risk reduction is 37.1% (58.9%-15.4%), the preventable fraction for the population is 28.3% (10.6%-40.0%), and the number needed to treat is 2.69. CONCLUSIONS: The health care quality protocol is effective to prevent ISP in ASAH patients. Implementing this prevention program has no effect on the neurological state of the patient at the hospital discharge. Still, it is successful in decreasing the PSI prevalence and the days of hospital stay.

Assessment of Factors Related to Diminished Appetite in Hemodialysis Patients with a New Adapted and Validated Questionnaire.

Appetite loss is a common phenomenon in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). We aimed to (i) adapt and validate a Spanish language version of the Council on Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire (CNAQ) and (ii) to identify psychological and biological factors associated with diminished appetite. We recruited 242 patients undergoing HD from four hemodialysis centers to validate the Spanish-translated version of the CNAQ. In another set of 182 patients from three HD centers, the Appetite and Diet Assessment Tool (ADAT) was used as the gold standard to identify a cut-off value for diminished appetite in our adapted questionnaire. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Distorted Thoughts Scale (DTS), Dialysis Malnutrition Score (DMS), anthropometric, values and laboratory values were also measured. Seven items were preserved in the adapted appetite questionnaire, with two factors associated with flavor and gastric fullness (Cronbach's alpha = 0.758). Diminished appetite was identified with a cut-off value ≤25 points (sensitivity 73%, specificity 77%). Patients with diminished appetite had a higher proportion of females and DMS punctuation, lower plasmatic level of creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and phosphorus. Appetite score correlated with BDI score, BAI score and DTS. Conclusions: This simple but robust appetite score adequately discriminates against patients with diminished appetite. Screening and treatment of psychological conditions may be useful to increase appetite and the nutritional status of these patients.

Validation of the Patient Dignity Inventory in Mexican Cancer Patients.

Introduction: The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) is a reliable screening instrument for a variety of problems (physical, existential, and social) that affect the dignity of patients during their end of life. The PDI has been translated into several different languages and has been validated in different settings. As such, it is important to validate the instrument in patients with cancer in Mexico to assess dignity in this population. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Spanish version of the PDI in Mexican patients with cancer. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that included patients with cancer, both those enrolled and not enrolled in palliative care, at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico City from September 2018 to August 2019. A translation and back translation were performed to obtain the Mexican version of the PDI (PDI-Mx) instrument. Patients completed the PDI-Mx, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and functional scales (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] and Karnofsky). Psychometric properties were evaluated by determining internal consistency, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and concurrent validity with the HADS. Results: We included 290 participants with cancer (145 in palliative care and 145 not enrolled in palliative care). The Cronbach's alpha of the PDI-Mx was 0.95. There was a significant correlation with the HADS (rs = 0.757, p < 0.0001). The factor analysis showed four factors that explain 64.7% of the model. The CFA presented adequate indicators, which show the adjustment of the structure that indicates a balanced and parsimonious model. Conclusions: The Mexican version of the PDI shows adequate psychometric properties in patients with cancer. We suggest the use of PDI-Mx in clinical care and research. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee with numbers (016/063/CPI) and (CEI/1115/16) respectively.

Association between severity of COVID-19 symptoms and habitual food intake in adult outpatients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between habitual frequency of food intake of certain food groups during the COVID-19 pandemic and manifestations of COVID-19 symptoms in adult outpatients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. DESIGN: We included 236 patients who attended an outpatient clinic for suspected COVID-19 evaluation. Severity of symptoms, habitual food intake frequency, demographics and Bristol chart scores were obtained before diagnostic confirmation with real-time reverse transcriptase PCR using nasopharyngeal swab. RESULTS: The results of the COVID-19 diagnostic tests were positive for 103 patients (44%) and negative for 133 patients (56%). In the SARS-CoV-2-positive group, symptom severity scores had significant negative correlations with habitual intake frequency of specific food groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and occupation confirmed that SARS-CoV-2-positive patients showed a significant negative association between having higher symptom severity and the habitual intake frequency of 'legumes' and 'grains, bread and cereals'. CONCLUSIONS: Increase in habitual frequency of intake of 'legumes', and 'grains, bread and cereals' food groups decreased overall symptom severity in patients with COVID-19. This study provides a framework for designing a protective diet during the COVID-19 pandemic and also establishes a hypothesis of using a diet-based intervention in the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may be explored in future studies.

Academic Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Relationship with Demographic Factors and Alcohol Consumption in College Students.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused many changes in the education sector worldwide, and school curricula have had to adapt to a non-face-to-face modality. However, international studies have concluded that this modality has affected the academic performance of students. The present study aimed to compare the academic performance of a sample of college students from before the start of quarantine with their current performance, and to test whether various demographic factors influenced these changes in conjunction with alcohol consumption. With a non-experimental, comparative and longitudinal design, we applied an ad hoc questionnaire, in conjunction with the AUDIT questionnaire, in a sample of college students (n = 341), and we also obtained data of academic average and failed subjects. The demographic factors that influenced academic performance were sex (p < 0.01), age (p < 0.01) and alcohol consumption (p = 0.001). Most students showed an improvement in their academic average during the quarantine period. Women without failed subjects and low-risk alcohol consumption obtained a better average in this period. In conclusion sex, age and alcohol consumption level were factors associated with academic performance during the quarantine period due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and women had a higher academic average than men did.

Validation of an instrument to assess health care quality (FACIT-TS-PS) in cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patient satisfaction with the healthcare team is of great relevance for assessing the quality of the care provided by the health system. In Mexico, no valid and reliable tool is available to assess this construct. OBJECTIVE: To validate the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Satisfaction (FACIT-TS-PS) instrument, version 4, in cancer patients. METHOD: Cross-sectional design, non-probability convenience sampling. The sample consisted of 200 cancer-diagnosed patients, with mean age of 45.86 ± 15.01 years. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis identified four factors, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.945, and an explained variance of 68.15 %. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the proposed theoretical model adjusts to the data with an error close to zero and, in addition, it is balanced and carefully measures overall patient satisfaction with the treatment. CONCLUSION: FACIT-TS-PS was shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for use in clinical care and research in Mexican cancer patients. Its use is recommended in the evaluation of oncology multidisciplinary healthcare teams in Mexico.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La satisfacción del paciente oncológico con el equipo de salud es de relevancia para evaluar la calidad de la atención del sistema de salud. En México no se dispone de una herramienta válida y confiable para evaluar este constructo. OBJETIVO: Validar el Instrumento de Evaluación de Funcionalidad en el Tratamiento para Enfermedades Crónicas-Satisfacción con el Tratamiento-Satisfacción del Paciente (FACIT-TS-PS) versión 4, en pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. MÉTODO: Diseño transversal, muestreo no probabilístico, por disponibilidad. La muestra consistió en 200 pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer, con edad promedio de 45.86 ± 15.01 años. Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron cuatro factores con un alfa de Cronbach de 0.945 y una varianza explicada de 68.15 %. El análisis factorial confirmatorio indicó que el modelo teórico propuesto se ajusta a los datos con error próximo a cero y que, además, es equilibrado y mide cuidadosamente la satisfacción global del paciente con el tratamiento. CONCLUSIÓN: FACIT-TS-PS mostró ser un instrumento válido y confiable para su uso en la atención clínica e investigación dirigida a pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Se recomienda su utilización en la evaluación de equipos de salud multidisciplinarios en oncología en México.

Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Evaluación Funcional para el Tratamiento del Cáncer, versión próstata (FACT-P), en pacientes mexicanos.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most frequent neoplasm in Mexican men, the research literature contains few studies that address prostate cancer patients and quality of life in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: To validate the Functional Assessment Cancer therapy (FACT-P) scale. METHOD: 201 males 49 to 90 years of age, at any clinical stage of prostate cancer, under treatment or follow-up participated. It's a non-experimental cross-sectional study. Patients were evaluated through the FACT-P jointly with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Exploratory analysis examined the factorial structure, and confirmatory analysis to evaluate the adjustment of the exploratory model to the data. RESULTS: A four-factor model that explained 64.65% of the variance, Cronbach's alpha 0.79, and correlations were statistically significant, Pearson's r of 0.146-0.716, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05. Analyses also distinguished metastatic patients from non-metastatic ones. The main indices of the confirmatory model were satisfactory for the adjustment of data and showed an estimate error close to zero. CONCLUSIONS: This Mexican version of FACT-P showed reliability and validity comparable to the original one.

ANTECEDENTES: El cáncer de próstata es la neoplasia más frecuente en los varones mexicanos, pero pocos estudios han abordado la calidad de vida en los pacientes con cáncer de próstata en México. OBJETIVO: Validar la Escala de Evaluación Funcional para el Tratamiento del Cáncer, versión próstata (FACT-P). MÉTODO: 201 pacientes de 49 a 90 años en cualquier etapa clínica, en tratamiento o seguimiento. Diseño de estudio: transversal no experimental. Se usaron el FACT-P, el Inventario de la Organización Europea para la Investigación y Tratamiento del cáncer y Calidad de Vida, y la Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria. Se realizaron análisis factorial exploratorio y análisis factorial confirmatorio para evaluar el ajuste del modelo de los datos, mediante el método de máxima verosimilitud. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo un modelo de dos factores y dos indicadores que explicaron el 64.65% de la varianza, alfa de Cronbach 0.79, correlaciones estadísticamente significativas, r de Pearson de 0.146-0.716, p < 0.01 y p < 0.05. La escala discrimina los pacientes sin y con metástasis. Los principales índices del modelo confirmatorio sugieren un modelo estable y parsimonioso, con error próximo a cero, que se ajusta aceptablemente a los datos analizados. CONCLUSIONES: La versión mexicana del FACT-P posee una confiabilidad y una validez adecuadas, similares a las de la original.

Validación de FACIT-TS-PS en una muestra de pacientes mexicanos con cáncer / Validation of an instrument to assess health care quality (FACIT-TS-PS) in cancer patients

Resumen Introducción: La satisfacción del paciente oncológico con el equipo de salud es de relevancia para evaluar la calidad de la atención del sistema de salud. En México no se dispone de una herramienta válida y confiable para evaluar este constructo. Objetivo: Validar el Instrumento de Evaluación de Funcionalidad en el Tratamiento para Enfermedades Crónicas-Satisfacción con el Tratamiento-Satisfacción del Paciente (FACIT-TS-PS) versión 4, en pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Método: Diseño transversal, muestreo no probabilístico, por disponibilidad. La muestra consistió en 200 pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer, con edad promedio de 45.86 ± 15.01 años. Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. Resultados: Se identificaron cuatro factores con un alfa de Cronbach de 0.945 y una varianza explicada de 68.15 %. El análisis factorial confirmatorio indicó que el modelo teórico propuesto se ajusta a los datos con error próximo a cero y que, además, es equilibrado y mide cuidadosamente la satisfacción global del paciente con el tratamiento. Conclusión: FACIT-TS-PS mostró ser un instrumento válido y confiable para su uso en la atención clínica e investigación dirigida a pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Se recomienda su utilización en la evaluación de equipos de salud multidisciplinarios en oncología en México.

Abstract Introduction: Cancer patient satisfaction with the healthcare team is of great relevance for assessing the quality of the care provided by the health system. In Mexico, no valid and reliable tool is available to assess this construct. Objective: To validate the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Satisfaction (FACIT-TS-PS) instrument, version 4, in cancer patients. Method: Cross-sectional design, non-probability convenience sampling. The sample consisted of 200 cancer-diagnosed patients, with mean age of 45.86 ± 15.01 years. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Results: The exploratory factor analysis identified four factors, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.945, and an explained variance of 68.15 %. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the proposed theoretical model adjusts to the data with an error close to zero and, in addition, it is balanced and carefully measures overall patient satisfaction with the treatment. Conclusion: FACIT-TS-PS was shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for use in clinical care and research in Mexican cancer patients. Its use is recommended in the evaluation of oncology multidisciplinary healthcare teams in Mexico.

Prevalence of Antibiotics Prescription and Assessment of Prescribed Daily Dose in Outpatients from Mexico City.

Pharmacoepidemiological research about antibiotics is supported by the World Health Organization (WHO), but data regarding antibiotic prevalence based on actual prescriptions and dosing patterns are insufficient. The aims were: (i) To estimate the prevalence and prescribed daily dose (PDD) of antibiotics in outpatients from Mexico City and (ii) to compare the PDD against the defined daily dose (DDD), as established by the WHO. The study included 685 prescriptions of antibiotics selected randomly from five geographical zones of Mexico City. Drug, dose, frequency, and duration of treatment were obtained from each prescription. PDD values of each antibiotic drug were calculated as the average of the daily doses. Sub-use and overuse were determined by the ratio PDD/DDD for each prescription. The most prescribed antibiotics to outpatients from Mexico City included six pharmacological groups: quinolones (28%), penicillins (23%), cephalosporins (17%), macrolides (10%), lincosamides (9%), and sulfonamides (4%). Both overuse and sub-use were high (55% and 63%, respectively). In conclusion, most of the antibiotics with a high prevalence of prescription also had a high rate of either sub-use or overuse, with prescribed doses that significantly differ with their corresponding DDD. The dosing variation has important clinical implications since it denotes low prescription control.

Propiedades Psicométricas del Instrumento de Evaluación de Funcionalidad en Tratamiento para el Cáncer-Función Cognitiva (FACT-COG) en pacientes mexicanas con cáncer de mama / Psychometric properties of the Functional Evaluation Instrument for Cancer Treatment-Cognitive Function (FACT-COG) in Mexican patients with breast cancer

Introducción: Las pacientes con cáncer de mama presentan dentro de sus principales efectos en su calidad de vida durante o posterior al tratamiento deterioro cognitivo. Su detección y atención oportuna puede mejorar la funcionalidad de este grupo de pacientes. Objetivo: Determinar las propiedades psicométricas del Instrumento de Evaluación de Funcionalidad en Tratamiento Para el Cáncer - Función Cognitiva (FACT-COG) en una muestra de pacientes con cáncer de mama mexicanas. Método: Participaron 200 pacientes del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, la edad promedio fue de 45.59 años. Se utilizó un diseño transversal no experimental. Instrumentos: FACT-COG, Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria (HADS) y el Mini Examen del Estado Mental (MMSE). Análisis estadístico: Se realizó un modelo factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio, así como validez concurrente. Resultados: Se identificaron cuatro factores con 36 reactivos. Las consistencias internas de cada subescala tuvieron un valor de entre 0,98 a 0,95, de la escala global 0,98, que explicaron el 77,6% de la varianza. El análisis factorial confirmatorio presenta indicadores adecuados y del ajuste de la estructura del modelo (CFI, RMR y RMSEA) que indican un modelo equilibrado y parsimonioso. La validez, por medio de correlación con las medidas concurrentes, mostró resultados significativos (r de Pearson de ,80 a -,55). Discusión y conclusión El FACT-COG en pacientes con cáncer de mama en población mexicana presentó adecuadas y robustas características psicométricas exploratorias y confirmatorias. La relevancia de los resultados obtenidos radica en que se trata de una población que puede llegar a requerir detección oportuna en afectaciones cognitivas durante su tratamiento

Introduction: Patients with breast cancer present within their main effects on their quality of life during or after treatment cognitive impairment. Its timely detection and attention can improve the functionality of this group of patients. Objective: To determine the psychometric properties of the Functionality Assessment Instrument in Cancer Treatment - Cognitive Function (FACT-COG) in a sample of Mexican breast cancer patients. Method: 200 patients from the National Institute of Cancerology participated; the average age was 45.59 years. A non-experimental transverse design was used. Instruments: FACT-COG, Anxiety and Hospital Depression Scale (HADS) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Statistical analysis: An exploratory and confimatory factorial model was carried out as well as concurrent validity. Results: Four factors with 36 items were identified. The internal consistencies of each subscale had a value of between 0.98 to 0.95, of the global scale 0.98, which explained 77.6% of the variance. The confirmatory factor analysis presents adequate indicators and the adjustment of the structure of the model (CFI, RMR and RMSEA) that indicate a balanced and parsimonious model. Validity, through correlation with concurrent measures, showed significant results (Pearson’s r from .80 to -.55). Discussion and conclusion The FACT-COG in patients with breast cancer in the Mexican population presented adequate and robust exploratory and confirmatory psychometric characteristics. The relevance of the results obtained is that it is a population that may require timely detection of cognitive impairments during treatment