Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Health Equity ; 7(1): 439-452, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37638119

ABSTRACT

In this narrative review, we describe historical and contemporary influences that prevent patients with fibroids from getting appropriate medical care. Using patient stories as examples, we highlight how misogyny on all levels hurts patients and prevents medical teams from doing their best. Importantly, inequity and disparities result in massive gaps in care delivery. We suggest that we, as gynecologists and surgeons, must join public discourse on this topic to highlight the inadequacies of care delivery and the reasons behind it, suggest potential solutions, and join patients and communities in formulating and implementing remedies.

2.
JSLS ; 27(1)2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36818766

ABSTRACT

Despite guidelines that assert that the vaginal route for benign hysterectomy is preferred as the most minimally invasive approach, rates of vaginal hysterectomy remain very low in the United States. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) might reverse the trend. Potential advantages of vNOTES compared to traditional laparoscopic and robotic approaches include the potential for less pain, decreased operative time, improved cosmesis, and decreased risks. Importantly, vNOTES might allow for the conversion of laparoscopic and robotic routes back to vaginal due to surgeon factors.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Female , Humans , Vagina/surgery , Hysterectomy, Vaginal , Hysterectomy , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(5): 548.e1-548.e10, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34147495

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High-volume and fellowship-trained surgeons have superior outcomes. However, in gynecology, a large proportion of cases are performed by low-volume surgeons. Simulation has been shown to be useful in assessing surgical skill and may be a useful tool in hospital credentialing and maintenance of privileges. OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between a surgical case volume and fellowship training with performance on simulated procedural tasks. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 108 obstetricians and gynecologists with laparoscopic privileges at 2 academic institutions completed a pre-test survey and performed 3 tasks on the LapSim laparoscopic virtual reality simulator. The pre-test survey inquired about the monthly laparoscopic case volume and prior training. Simulations included a basic skills task (peg transfer) followed by a procedural task (salpingectomy) of 2 difficulty levels (low and moderate). Spearman correlation and Wilcoxon tests were used to determine correlations between the survey responses and performance metrics. RESULTS: Participants included 67 generalists (62%) and 41 fellowship-trained specialists (38%). There was an observed weak correlation among surgical volume (more than 6 cases per month), time to completion, and the amount of blood loss when performing the low-difficulty level salpingectomy (r=-0.32, P=.0007 and r=-0.29, P=.002, respectively). The economy of movement (instrument path length) was correlated to high surgical volume (r=-0.35, P=.0002). Compared with generalists, surgeons with fellowship training performed tasks faster (410.8 seconds [interquartile range, 309.7-595.2]) vs 530.2 seconds (interquartile range, 406.2-605.0; P=.0009), more efficiently at 6.1 m (interquartile range, 4.8-7.3) vs 8.1 m (interquartile range, 5.8-10.7; P=.0003), and with less blood loss at 21.7 mL (interquartile range, 11.8-37.7) vs 42.9 mL (interquartile range, 18.1-70.6; P=.002). Regarding the case volume and fellowship background, there was no difference in ovarian diathermy damage. In addition, there was no difference among most performance parameters for the peg transfer task and the moderate-difficulty salpingectomy procedure. CONCLUSION: Surgical experience obtained through higher case volume and fellowship training correlate with higher performance scores during simulated procedural tasks. In a previous study, we found a similar correlation with simulated basic skills tasks. The current study is a continuation of an ongoing quality initiative to establish a summative assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills using virtual reality simulator for the maintenance of credentials among obstetrical and gynecologic surgeons. Future studies will compare the performance metrics from laparoscopic procedures performed on virtual reality simulator with the performance in the operating room and clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Fellowships and Scholarships , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Gynecology , Laparoscopy/education , Obstetrics , Simulation Training , Blood Loss, Surgical , Clinical Competence , Computer Simulation , Gynecology/education , Humans , Obstetrics/education , Virtual Reality
4.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(7): 1285-1290, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34029745

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Simulation-based assessment is poised for application in educational promotion and credentialing in gynecologic surgery. With high-stakes assessment, validation necessitates evidence, not just about the trustworthiness of decisions but of beneficial consequences to education and healthcare as well. In this paper, we unpack the modern conceptualization of validity as it pertains to surgical simulation and high-stakes competency assessment. DESIGN: N/A SETTING: N/A PATIENTS: N/A INTERVENTIONS: N/A MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: N/A CONCLUSION: Validity in high-stakes simulation-based assessment necessitates evidence, not just about the trustworthiness of score-based decisions but of beneficial consequences to education and healthcare as well.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Computer Simulation , Credentialing , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(1): 77-82, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32541279

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the new requirement for Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery certification among graduating obstetrics and gynecology residents, there has been an increased interest in simulation training. The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery curriculum uses a commercial laparoscopic box trainer to practice and assess laparoscopic skills. We created a low-cost, space-efficient, portable and versatile training platform that allows for the breakdown of complex tasks, and we studied its user acceptability. METHOD: A rectangular piece of pine wood purchased at a hardware store was used as a base; metal eye hooks were used as ports, and a blueprint was created to simulate placement of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery inserts. In addition to the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery skills, this platform can be used for any laparoscopic task (such as hysterectomy or cuff closure). Additionally, this platform can be used with or without a camera to allow for task breakdown into simpler components for faster learning. EXPERIENCE: A usability and acceptability survey was administered to a convenient sample of faculty and trainees. Trainees and faculty responded favorably to the model. Residents, fellows, and attendings felt that the laparoscopic platform closely simulated the feel of performing live laparoscopy surgery. CONCLUSION: This is a novel low-cost laparoscopic platform to add to the gynecologic surgical education simulation toolkit.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Internship and Residency , Laparoscopy/education , Simulation Training/economics , Female , Gynecology , Humans , Obstetrics
6.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 25(4): 298-304, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29443815

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The use of simulation-based education to train surgeons is widely accepted. Although many authors describe the use of an Objective Skills Assessment Test (OSAT) to assess performance of various surgical procedures, there is a paucity of research on use of this modality to evaluate vaginal surgery skills. We created a vaginal hysterectomy procedure-specific checklist (PSC) to complete the OSAT (which is composed of a PSC and a global rating scale [GRS]). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of a novel evaluation strategy for vaginal hysterectomy using an OSAT combining PSC and GRS. METHODS: This is a descriptive prospective study from a single institution. After orientation to the model, participants were filmed performing vaginal hysterectomy. A blinded grader scored each subject using the PSC and GRS. RESULTS: Medical students, residents, fellows, and attendings performed vaginal hysterectomy on a simulated model. Mean PSC and GRS scores increased significantly with surgeon level of experience (P < 0.001). Procedure-specific checklist scores significantly correlated with GRS scores (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The vaginal hysterectomy model and PSC have been studied across different surgeon levels using OSATs. Training programs should consider using this low-cost task trainer as a teaching tool.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Hysterectomy, Vaginal/education , Simulation Training/methods , Checklist , Female , Gynecology/education , Humans , Internship and Residency/standards , Obstetrics/education , Physicians/standards , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Students, Medical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...