Novel use of contrast enhanced ultrasonography with urodynamics in children: A comparison study to fluoroscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Video urodynamics (UDS) has classically been performed using fluoroscopy (fluoro). Contrast enhanced voiding ultrasonography (ceVUS) has rarely been reported for use with UDS. This is the first study to compare the imaging characteristics of ceVUS versus fluoro UDS. METHODS: Children were enrolled for ceVUS UDS who previously underwent fluoro UDS. Demographics, imaging data for ceVUS and fluoro UDS, time between studies, and clinical data between studies were recorded. Changes in clinical status included implantation/cessation of catheterization or anticholinergic medications, leakage between, urinary tract infections, hydronephrosis and neurologic changes. Comparison testing was performed using McNemar's Chi-Squared and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. RESULTS: Seventy-five children were recruited. Median time between studies was 1.3 years (IQR 0.9-2.9). There were no differences for bladder shape (p = 0.59), vesicoureteral reflux (p = 0.10), bladder neck (p = 0.59) or urethra (p = 1.0) between studies. In 5 cases, the bladder neck could not be visualized adequately due to layering of the microbubble contrast against urine. Benefits to ceVUS included ability to visualize the exact moment the bladder neck opened. Following exclusion of patients with clinical changes that might affect imaging findings, an analysis of 28 patients demonstrated no differences between the two studies. CONCLUSIONS: CeVUS can be used adequately in conjunction with UDS. Limitations to ceVUS include more granular imaging for bladder shape versus fluoro and inability to visualize bladder neck if residual urine is in the bladder, mitigated by bladder emptying. Benefits include ability to visualize the dynamic activity of the bladder neck due to constant imaging with ceVUS.

Parental perception of contrast enhanced voiding ultrasonography urodynamics vs fluoroscopic urodynamics.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Contrast enhanced voiding ultrasonography (ceVUS) has not been widely reported to be used during video urodynamics (UDS). We previously reported on the feasibility of this. In this study, we aimed to understand how parents perceived their child's experience of undergoing ceVUS during UDS compared to fluoroscopic (fluoro) UDS. METHODS: Children who underwent both fluoro UDS and ceVUS UDS were recruited. Parents were asked to complete a questionnaire to evaluate their experience with both studies. Demographics including gender, age at study, and diagnosis were collected to account for differences in perception. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: 53 patients were included: 31 girls, 22 boys. Diagnoses included myelomeningocele (67.9%), low/tethered cord (13.2%), closed spinal dysraphism (9.4%), posterior urethral valve (1.9%), cloacal anomaly (1.9%), caudal regression (1.9%), myeloschisis (1.9%), and cerebral palsy (1.9%). There was no statistical difference in mean age at fluoro UDS and ceVUS UDS (77.3 months vs 99.7 months respectively, p = 0.09). All 53 parents (100%) were satisfied/very satisfied with their ceVUS experience; 48 parents (90.6%) preferred ceVUS, 3 parents (5.7%) preferred fluoro UDS, and 2 (3.8%) were neutral. On average, parents perceived ceVUS to be more comfortable (72.7%) and produce better results (67.4%) than fluoro UDS. The majority felt that both studies allowed the same contact with their child (52.3%) and took the same amount of time (50.0%). However 29.5% felt ceVUS was faster and 34.1% felt ceVUS allowed more contact with their child (Fig. 1). 26 parents (49.1%) specifically noted no radiation as the reason why they preferred ceVUS over fluoro. The average age at ceVUS UDS was younger in those who preferred ceVUS UDS compared to those who preferred fluoro UDS (94.6 months vs 180.0 months, p = 0.03). The average age at fluoro UDS was younger in those who preferred ceVUS UDS vs fluoro UDS (73.1 months vs 144 months, p = 0.03). Gender's influence on preference approached significance (p = 0.07); all 3 parents who preferred fluoro UDS had male children. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of parents preferred ceVUS over fluoro UDS. ceVUS was perceived to be more comfortable and provide better results. Many parents highlighted no radiation and no fluoroscopic machinery as factors in preference of ceVUS over fluoro. The parents who preferred ceVUS UDS had children who had both studies done at an earlier age compared to the parents who preferred fluoro UDS.

Viability of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography as an alternative to fluoroscopy during video urodynamics.

Pediatric urodynamic studies are performed to evaluate bladder function, commonly in conjunction with a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CeVUS) has been approved in the evaluation of vesicoureteral reflux and has been shown to have equal or superior diagnostic value to VCUG. In this technical innovation, we have shown that ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles are compatible with the equipment used for urodynamic evaluation. We have also shown that it is feasible to use contrast ultrasound in pediatric urodynamic examinations. The purpose of our study was to assess the technical feasibility of CeVUS during urodynamics with an in vitro test followed by a vivo evaluation. This single-center prospective study enrolled 25 patients aged 0-18 years who underwent CeVUS instead of VCUG at their regularly scheduled appointment. During the in vitro saline experiment, the radiologic and urologic equipment were found to be compatible. Microbubbles were observed at flow rates of 10 and 20 ml/min.

Benefits and barriers to pediatric tele-urology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine video visits are an under-utilized form of delivering health care. However due to the COVID-19 pandemic, practices are rapidly adapting telemedicine for patient care. We describe our experience in rapidly introducing video visits in a tertiary academic pediatric urology practice, serving primarily rural patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to assess visit success rate and identify barriers to completing video visits. The secondary aim identified types of pathologies feasible for video visits and travel time saved. We hypothesize socioeconomic status is a predictor of a successful visit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was prospectively collected and analyzed on video visits focusing on visit success, defined by satisfactory completion of the visit as assessed by the provider. Other variables collected included duration, video platform and technical problems. Retrospective data was collected via chart review and analyzed including demographics, insurance, and distance to care. Socioeconomic status was estimated using the Distressed Communities Index generated for patient zip code. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Out of 116 attempted visits, 81% were successful. The top two reasons for failure were "no-show" (64%) and inability to connect (14%). Success versus failure of visit was similar for patient age (p = 0.23), sex (p = 0.42), type of visit (initial vs. established) (p = 0.51), and socioeconomic status (p = 0.39). After adjusting for race, socioeconomic status, and type of provider, having public insurance remained a significant predictor of failure (p = 0.017). Successful visits were conducted on multiple common pediatric urologic problems (excluding visits requiring palpation on exam), and video was sufficient for physical exams in most cases (Summary Table). A median of 2.25 h of travel time was saved. CONCLUSIONS: While socioeconomic status, estimated using the Distressed Communities Index, did not predict success of video visits, patients with public insurance were more likely to have a failed video visit. There is compelling evidence that effective video visits for certain pathologies can be rapidly achieved in a pediatric urology practice with minimal preparation time.

Usability and safety of the new 5 French air-charged catheter for performing urodynamic studies on pediatric patients.

AIMS: To assess the performance and safety of the T-DOC® 5 French air-charged urodynamic catheters in pediatric patients and obtain feedback from providers related to usability performance. METHODS: Patients ages 12 years and younger undergoing urodynamics were prospectively recruited from two institutions. The T-DOC® 5 French air-charged catheters were used. Issues with catheter placement, adverse events (AEs), and pain scores were assessed. A follow-up telephone call was made to assess for post-urodynamic AEs. Providers completed a clinical user questionnaire. Likert scale was used (1 = most negative and 5 = most positive response) and reported in mean (range). RESULTS: A total of 28 patients completed the study. The mean age was 55 months (5-130) (10 females, 18 males). One problem was noted with the insertion of an abdominal catheter, secondary to stool impaction. Catheters stayed in place on all subjects, except for one related to patient hyperactivity. There were no AEs during the studies. In total four reported post-urodynamics AEs (one hematochezia, three dysuria). Among nine patients, pain level on the bladder and abdominal insertion was 3.6/10 (0-10) and 3.1/10 (0-10). Five providers completed the questionnaire. The overall ease of use was rated 4.3/5 (3-5). The ease of insertion was 4.1/5 (2-5) and set-up/clean-up time was 4.4/5 (3-5). Tracing stability, subtraction accuracy, and artifact sensitivity were all perceived favorably (respectively 4.8/5 [4-5], 4.6/5 [4-5], and 4.4/5 [4-5]). CONCLUSIONS: The T-DOC® 5 French air-charged catheter was considered safe and effective in pediatric patients. No AEs occurred during the studies. Providers, using the catheters, reported favorably on catheter usage.

Complementary and Integrative Management of Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Implemented within an Interprofessional Clinic.

Lower urinary tract dysfunction in children is a common multifactorial functional problem that often correlates with bowel dysfunction and behavioral disorders. Ideal management combines integrative therapies that optimize bladder and bowel habits, address behavioral issues, foster mind-body connection, and improve pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. Movement therapies that teach diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, mind-body awareness, and healthy pelvic floor muscle function are vital for long-term symptom improvement in children. This paper outlines recommendations for integrative management of these patients and discusses a recently developed interprofessional clinic that aims to better meet these patients' complex needs and to provide patients with an integrated holistic plan of care. Additional work is needed to scientifically assess these treatment models and educate providers across the various disciplines that evaluate and treat these patients.