Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 41
Filter
1.
HNO ; 70(9): 675-684, 2022 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35920880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus and vertigo have been studied in many ways. This led to a variety of explanations from multiple medical disciplines. The musculature of the jaw and cervical spine have also been researched in this regard. Dysfunctional musculature can trigger tinnitus and dizziness. This subtype of tinnitus is called cervicogenic somatosensory tinnitus. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of manual therapy on subject-reported, individually perceived impairment due to cervicogenic somatosensory tinnitus (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory), dizziness (Dizziness Handicap Inventory), and hypertonia of the musculature of the head and cervical spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, 80 patients (40 in the intervention group/40 in the control group) were medically examined and interviewed. Afterwards, they received targeted manual therapy. RESULTS: After manual therapy, there were significant differences in the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Dizziness Handicap Inventory, and muscular hypertonia between the groups, all in favor of the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Manual examination and therapy proved to be effective. It should be increasingly applied in the absence of ENT pathology and suspected cervicogenic somatosensory tinnitus. The role of individual muscles requires further investigation.


Subject(s)
Tinnitus , Dizziness/diagnosis , Dizziness/etiology , Dizziness/therapy , Humans , Muscle Hypertonia , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Tinnitus/diagnosis , Tinnitus/therapy
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(9): 4363-4370, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34931263

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Superficial hemosiderosis is a sub-form of hemosiderosis in which the deposits of hemosiderin in the central nervous system damage the nerve cells. This form of siderosis is caused by chronic cerebral hemorrhages, especially subarachnoid hemorrhages. The diversity of symptoms depends on the respective damage to the brain, but in most of the cases it shows up as incipient unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, ataxia and signs of pyramidal tracts. We are investigating the question of whether cochlear implantation is a treatment option for patients with superficial hemosiderosis and which strategy of diagnostic procedure has to be ruled out preoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a tertiary hospital between 2009 and 2018, we examined (N = 5) patients with radiologically confirmed central hemosiderosis who suffered from profound hearing loss to deafness were treated with a cochlear implant (CI). We compared pre- and postoperative speech comprehension (Freiburg speech intelligibility test for monosyllables and HSM sentence test). RESULTS: Speech understanding improved on average by 20% (monosyllabic test in the Freiburg speech intelligibility test) and by 40% in noise (HSM sentence test) compared to preoperative speech understanding with optimized hearing aids. DISCUSSION: The results show that patients with superficial siderosis benefit from CI with better speech understanding. The results are below the average for all postlingual deaf CI patients. Superficial siderosis causes neural damages, which explains the reduced speech understanding based on central hearing loss. It is important to correctly weigh the patient's expectations preoperatively and to include neurologists within the therapy procedure.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hemosiderosis , Siderosis , Speech Perception , Cochlea , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Hemosiderosis/complications , Hemosiderosis/diagnosis , Hemosiderosis/surgery , Humans , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(11): 4187-4197, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33336301

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate the auditory pathway maturation monitored by auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in infants with hearing loss during the first year of life. ABR were used to estimate hearing thresholds and the effect of early intervention strategies using hearing aids (HA). METHODS: Click-evoked ABRs were measured in 102 infants aged from 0 to 12 months to determine their individual auditory threshold. Early therapy intervention was recommended before 12 months of age and analyzed. To evaluate the effect of hearing amplification on auditory maturation, different subgroups of infants with moderate hearing loss were analyzed and the auditory pathway maturation was determined based on IPL I-V shortening. RESULTS: Overall, 110 ears (54.0% of 204 ears) with mild to profound HL showed threshold changes of 10 dB up to 60 dB in the follow-up ABR testing. HA were prescribed at the age of 3.8 ± 3.9 months. Cochlear implantation (CI) was performed in cases of repeated profound HL at the age of 9.9 months ± 4.5 months. A significant shortening of IPL I-V in all subgroups of infants (with and without risk factors) who received HA was shown and assumed auditory pathway maturation. CONCLUSION: An early intervention using optimally fitted HA influenced auditory pathway maturation and may lead to improvements of hearing thresholds during the first year of life in infants. This study underscores the importance of not only providing HAs to infants, but also controlling for hearing threshold changes ensuring that HAs provide the optimal level of intervention or CI is indicated.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Auditory Pathways , Auditory Threshold , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Humans , Infant
4.
HNO ; 68(Suppl 1): 17-24, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31705300

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) are limited by their asymmetric hearing in various areas of everyday life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to perform an age-correlated comparison of the hearing threshold of the better ear of SSD patients with a normal-hearing (NH) reference cohort. In addition, the potential influence of etiology, duration of deafness, and cochlear implantation (CI) of the poorer ear on the peripheral hearing ability of the better ear was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicenter study, the mean bone conduction hearing threshold of the better ear of 413 adult SSD patients was compared with that of an NH cohort drawn from ISO 7029:2017 for the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. RESULTS: SSD patients showed significantly poorer hearing in the better ear compared to the age-correlated group of NH subjects. CI, duration of deafness, and etiology had no significant effect on the hearing ability of the better ear. CONCLUSION: The origin of the poorer hearing of the better-hearing ear of SSD patients compared to an age-correlated NH cohort is still unclear. It is most likely a combination of different anatomical, immunological, etiological, and microcirculatory causes, which lead to poorer hearing of the better-hearing ear in SSD patients.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Speech Perception , Adult , Humans , Microcirculation
5.
HNO ; 67(10): 739-749, 2019 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31478062

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) are limited by their asymmetric hearing in various areas of everyday life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to perform an age-correlated comparison of the hearing threshold of the better ear of SSD patients with a normal-hearing (NH) reference cohort. In addition, the potential influence of etiology, duration of deafness, and cochlear implantation (CI) of the poorer ear on the peripheral hearing ability of the better ear was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicenter study, the mean bone conduction hearing threshold of the better ear of 413 adult SSD patients was compared with that of an NH cohort drawn from ISO 7029:2017 for the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. RESULTS: SSD patients showed significantly poorer hearing in the better ear compared to the age-correlated group of NH subjects. CI, duration of deafness, and etiology had no significant effect on the hearing ability of the better ear. CONCLUSION: The origin of the poorer hearing of the better-hearing ear of SSD patients compared to an age-correlated NH cohort is still unclear. It is most likely a combination of different anatomical, immunological, etiological, and microcirculatory causes, which lead to poorer hearing of the better-hearing ear in SSD patients.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Speech Perception , Adult , Audiometry, Speech , Auditory Threshold , Hearing , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Humans , Microcirculation
6.
HNO ; 66(3): 232-236, 2018 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28819893

ABSTRACT

One of the rare genetic diseases with sensory hearing loss is the microdeletion 7q syndrome. First described in the 1990s, only 7 cases of patients with this disease are described in the literature. Although this mutation is not well known, otological treatment is necessary if the DFNA5 gene is affected. A mutation in this gene leads to progressive hearing loss. Affected children therefore need regular evaluation of their hearing to ensure adequate treatment with hearing aids at early stages. We now present a case of an affected child with sensory hearing loss, mental retardation and anogenital malformations. In the following we describe the course of disease and possible treatment options. We especially describe the possibility of cochlear implantation. We can show with this case report that, even though massive mental retardation is shown, cochlear implantation is useful in this patient. Associated disabilities as cardiac and pulmonary problems may occur and should be treated before cochlear implantation. This is the first report of cochlear implantation in a child affected with microdeletion 7q syndrome.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7 , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Child , Female , Hearing , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Humans , Receptors, Estrogen , Syndrome
7.
HNO ; 65(3): 203-210, 2017 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27689228

ABSTRACT

In the assessment process of hearing impairment the medical expert has to verify its causality and to quantify its severity as hearing loss in percentage. Based on the determined hearing loss in percentage, the degree of impairment/disability or, in the case of work-related noise-induced hearing loss, the reduction in earning capacity is estimated. In Germany the guideline for the expert assessment of work-related noise-induced hearing loss is the Königstein Guideline. Currently, the 5th edition from 2012 is used. Here, the hearing loss quantification depends mainly on the results of speech audiometry. Based on the Freiburg speech test, the hearing loss in percentage is determined using approved tables. For patients with a mild hearing loss, typically characterized by a high-frequency hearing loss, tone audiometry results are consulted additionally. Speech-in-noise tests are available and are frequently used to measure the benefit of hearing systems. They allow for the detection of these patients' hearing impairment, which generally occurs in noisy environments. The first suggestions for a table to determine hearing loss in noise in percent are available. In experimental studies it was shown that tests in quiet, other than the Freiburg speech test, can be used and the same tables can be applied. In this article the current use of speech audiometry for expert assessment is presented, and options of using further developed speech test material are discussed.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Speech/methods , Audiometry, Speech/standards , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Expert Testimony/standards , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Cognition Disorders/complications , Disability Evaluation , Expert Testimony/methods , Germany , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Translating
9.
Hear Res ; 333: 77-86, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26778469

ABSTRACT

Mutations in the GJB2 gene are known to represent the commonest cause of hereditary and congenital hearing loss. In this study, a complete sequencing of the GJB2 gene in a cohort of 506 patients from a single, large cochlear implant program in Europe was performed. Audiological testing for those patients who could actively participate was performed using pure tone audiometry (PTA). Those unable to undergo PTA were measured using click-auditory brainstem response (ABR). Data analysis was performed to determine genotype-phenotype correlations of the mutational status vs. audiological profiles and vs. age at the time of presentation. An overall prevalence of biallelic mutations of 13.4% was found for the total collective. When subsets of younger patients were examined, the prevalence increased to 27% of those up to age 18 and 35% of those up to age 5 at the time of testing, respectively. This increase was found to be highly significant (p < 0.001). Analysis of the mean PTA thresholds revealed a strong correlation between allele combination status and mean PTA (p = 0.021). The prevalence of simple heterozygotes was found to be approximately 10.1%, which is around 3.3 times the value expected in the general population. As GJB2 follows a recessive pattern of inheritance, the question arises as to why such a large fraction of simple heterozygotes was observed among the hearing impaired patients included in this study.


Subject(s)
Connexins/genetics , Hearing Disorders/genetics , Hearing/genetics , Mutation , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Child , Child, Preschool , Connexin 26 , DNA Mutational Analysis , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Female , Gene Frequency , Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Germany/epidemiology , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Heterozygote , Homozygote , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Young Adult
10.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 95(4): 251-7, 2016 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26743979

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The number of implantation of cochlear implants has steadily risen in recent years. Reasons for this are an extension of indication criteria, demographic change, increased quality of life needs and greater acceptance. The consequences are rising expenditure for statutory health insurance (SHI) for cochlear implantation. A detailed calculation of lifetime costs from SHI's perspective for postlingually deafened adolescents and adults is essential in estimating future cost developments. METHODS: Calculations are based on accounting data from the Hannover Medical School. With regard to further life expectancy, average costs of preoperative diagnosis, surgery, rehabilitation, follow-ups, processor upgrades and electrical maintenance were discounted to their present value at age of implantation. RESULTS: There is an inverse relation between cost of unilateral cochlear implantation and age of initial implantation. From SHI's perspective, the intervention costs between 36,001 and 68,970 € ($ 42,504-$ 81,429). The largest cost components are initial implantation and processor upgrades. CONCLUSION: Compared to the UK the cost of cochlear implantation in Germany seems to be significantly lower. In particular the costs of, rehabilitation and maintenance in Germany cause only a small percentage of total costs. Also, the costs during the first year of treatment seem comparatively low. With regard to future spending of SHI due to implant innovations and associated extension of indication, increasing cost may be suspected.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , National Health Programs/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Child , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/economics , Female , Forecasting , Germany , Health Expenditures/trends , Humans , Life Expectancy/trends , Life Tables , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs/trends , Reoperation/economics , Young Adult
11.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 93(9): 605-11, 2014 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24936690

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Complications in Children and Adults with Cochlear Implant Background: Cochlear Implants (CI) are developed in the last 20 years to a regular therapy in congenital deaf children/newborns and deafened teens and adults. The success of speech understanding with the CI in adults is so extraordinary that meanwhile also unilateral deaf, contralateral normal hearing persons are implanted. In case of early implanted children a nearly normal speech development is possible in most of the cases. MATERIAL UND METHODS: Nevertheless the surgical procedures is a challenge concerning the potential complications combined with a foreign body, the CI, in a non-steril part of the ear. RESULTS: This paper reports on the complications in a patients collective, implanted within 21 years. Separated within the severity of the complications and their therapeutic consequences (conservative and surgical) it could be shown that the incidence of severe perioperative complications within the second decade could be reduced from 3.92% (first decade) to 1.8%. Also the companies have learned to construct the products more save. CONCLUSION: In summary the reliable and complete postoperative control and the modification of therapy concepts leads to a constant reduction of complications.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Deafness/rehabilitation , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
12.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 91(12): 782-8, 2012 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22234848

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In addition to the standardized Freiburg sentence test in silence validated speech tests in noise are available. They are mainly used to test the benefit of hearing systems in everyday-life situations. In diagnostics tests in noise can also give additional information of the patients' hearing impairment. The determined speech reception threshold (SRT) depends on the degree of hearing loss and the used speech and noise test material. Aim of this study was to analyze the results of the Göttingen sentence test in noise in relation to different audiogram classes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Göttingen sentence test in stationary noise (65 dB) was performed for 135 patients with different degrees of hearing losses. Based on the air-conducted threshold all ears were categorized to an audiogram class by an automated procedure. RESULTS: For the mild hearing losses the results of the Göttingen sentence test increased with increasing pure-tone-average (PTA) and the values are smaller than 0 dB SNR with a small standard deviation (± 1-2 dB SNR). For the moderate hearing losses values of 5 dB SNR with a standard deviation of 6 dB SNR were achieved on average. Patients with a high hearing loss achieved values higher than 20 dB SNR. CONCLUSION: For the mild hearing losses the results were located in a small range. However, they can give important information about the patient's hearing impairment mainly appears in a noisy environment. With increasing hearing loss also the reduced hearing in silence affects the results achieved with the Göttingen sentence test in noise. Therefore the hearing in silence has to be taken into account at the interpretation of the results.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods , Audiometry, Speech/methods , Hearing Loss, High-Frequency/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Speech Reception Threshold Test , Adult , Aged , Auditory Threshold , Expert Testimony , Female , Germany , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, High-Frequency/classification , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/classification , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/classification , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/classification , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Reference Values
13.
HNO ; 59(11): 1111-7, 2011 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21959774

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Germany the guideline for the hearing loss quantification and the resulting assessment of the reduction in earning capacity is the Königsteiner Merkblatt (KM). The quantification depends on the results of the tone and speech audiogram in silence. However, speech discrimination tests in noise may provide additional information about the impairment of the ENT patients. Especially, the impairment of persons with a slight hearing loss, characterized by high-frequency hearing loss, in noisy environment can not be indicated by the measurement in silence, which is proposed in the KM. METHODS UND PATIENTS: The Göttingen sentence test in noise was applied as a supplement to the routine ENT procedures of the medical estimate in 135 test persons. Based on these measurement results a table for the percentage hearing loss in noise is defined. Furthermore, an integration of the hearing loss in noise in the assessment of the reduction in earning capacity is proposed in addition to the hearing loss in silence. RESULTS: Using the newly introduced hearing loss for speech in noise, a suitable assessment for persons with a slight hearing loss is achieved. By integrating it into the assessment procedure additionally to the hearing loss in silence, the hearing impairment of all patients can be rated depending on their speech test results in silence and in noise. In comparison to the results obtained by the KM, the new procedure does not lead to higher values for the proposed reduction in earning capacity in general, but instead seems to be equally suitable for all groups of patients.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/economics , Hearing Tests/economics , Income/statistics & numerical data , Speech Discrimination Tests/economics , Work Capacity Evaluation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Tests/methods , Hearing Tests/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Speech Discrimination Tests/methods , Speech Discrimination Tests/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
14.
HNO ; 58(12): 1208-16, 2010 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20652209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The parent questionnaire ELFRA-2 is considered a valid tool for early detection of delayed language development in 2-year-old children. Applicability for children treated with cochlear implants (CI) is to be investigated. METHODS: By means of the ELFRA-2 we documented longitudinally for up to 24 months post implantation language development in 27 children treated before 3 years of age. The critical developmental criteria (related to age) were applied to CI children (related to duration of CI use) and gender-related normative data were taken as a reference. RESULTS: Only two boys were identified as showing a language delay after 2 years of CI use. However, using normative data 11-44% of the children performed below average. Development in girls was faster than in boys. The influence of preoperative hearing experience declined over time. CONCLUSION: The critical developmental criteria of ELFRA-2 have proved to be unreliable for the identification of varying development after CI. Modified and gender-related evaluation is necessary.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Language Development Disorders/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Child, Preschool , Early Diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Language Development Disorders/diagnosis , Male , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Vocabulary
16.
HNO ; 58(2): 110-2, 114-6, 2010 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20111915

ABSTRACT

According to German law granting of driving licenses depends on the proof of an adequate driving capability. The corresponding guidelines are at present in the process of being revised. At the moment bilateral deafness and high-grade hearing loss (> or = 60% in pure tone audiometry) are not exclusion criteria for driving licenses grades A, B and C, while driving licenses grade D and licenses for public transport are generally excluded. In the forthcoming revised edition of the guidelines it has been suggested that the latter group will also not be excluded. The regulations concerning dizziness are wide-sweeping at the moment as no driving license will be granted if dizziness is present but will be more specific in the next issue. In particular a division will be made between single axle and two axle vehicles. An expert assessment about driving suitability can only be made by a certified specialist with qualifications in traffic medicine.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/legislation & jurisprudence , Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Automobile Driver Examination/legislation & jurisprudence , Deafness/diagnosis , Dizziness/diagnosis , Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence , Licensure/legislation & jurisprudence , Otolaryngology/legislation & jurisprudence , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Deafness/classification , Disability Evaluation , Dizziness/classification , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Humans , Motor Vehicles/classification , Motor Vehicles/legislation & jurisprudence
18.
Int J Audiol ; 48(5): 233-9, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19842798

ABSTRACT

Modern cochlear implant systems deliver impulse transmission rates up to 50,000 pps. It emerged that the fast stimulation rates led to enhanced speech comprehension. Impedance measurement is an important aspect in cochlear implant testing procedures. Impedance values are a measure of the electrical resistance between the individual implant electrodes. Increased impedances were attributed frequently to inflammatory/tissue-related processes. In recent years, however, we have repeatedly found cases of impedance increase for which the inflammatory model did not provide a satisfactory explanation. The aim of this study is to evaluate increases in impedance in our cochlear implant population, to attempt to find their cause, and to formulate therapeutic hypotheses. In our cochlear implant programme (> 3000 recipients) we screened our database for impedance increases over time during device fitting. We found 16 patients with 18 affected ears in whom impedance increases were clearly demonstrated. We found that especially in cases without any sign of prior inflammation, increasing the pulse width of the stimulation strategy seems to be an effective tool to return increased impedances to normal levels.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deafness/therapy , Electric Impedance , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Deafness/surgery , Humans , Inflammation , Time Factors
19.
Audiol Neurootol ; 14 Suppl 1: 8-13, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19390170

ABSTRACT

Today, cochlear implantation is the treatment of choice in the case of severe to profound hearing loss, but the speech perception abilities of many recipients in noisy conditions are still poor and the overall sound quality and ease of listening still require improvement. Residual low-frequency hearing has been associated with improved hearing performance in cochlear implant patients, especially in difficult listening environments (i.e. cocktail party effect). It seems that low-frequency information can enhance the segregation of competing voices, which leads to better speech understanding in noise. We investigated the effect of low-frequency hearing on speech perception performance in a group of subjects being implanted with the Nucleus Hybrid-L device. The Hybrid-L device is a modified Nucleus Freedom implant, which instead of the standard electrode carries a very delicate electrode array that allows preservation of residual hearing to a great extent. Sentence test results from 22 subjects are presented here. Additionally, for 8 subjects, the acoustically presented frequency range was limited to 300, 500 and 700 Hz, and speech perception tests with a single competing talker were conducted. The Hybrid-L study group achieved a speech reception threshold of 15.9 dB in the hearing aid alone condition, 10.8 dB in the cochlear implant alone condition, and 3.9 dB when using the combination of cochlear implant and hearing aid. Differences between the 3 conditions are statistically significant. Results from the additional experiment on the acoustically presented frequency range suggest that very limited residual hearing below 500 Hz is already sufficient to produce a significant improvement in speech perception performance in conjunction with a cochlear implant.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss/surgery , Hearing Loss/therapy , Pitch Perception , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Combined Modality Therapy , Electric Stimulation , Humans , Middle Aged , Speech Acoustics , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...