Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 38(11): 1010-6, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9824781

ABSTRACT

Famotidine pharmacokinetics were studied in 13 patients with severe cystic fibrosis (CF) ranging from 10 to 47 years of age and 25 to 72 kg in weight. Patients were randomized to first receive famotidine either 20 mg intravenously or 40 mg orally. Twelve patients were crossed over to the alternate treatment. Repeated blood samples were obtained over 12 hours after intravenous and oral administration and urine was collected over 24 hours for quantitation of famotidine by means of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A compartment model-dependent approach was used to characterize the disposition of famotidine. From the intravenous data, the mean +/- standard deviation elimination half-life (t1/2) was 2.11 +/- 0.75 hours, the total clearance (Cl) was 0.79 +/- 0.41 L/kg/hr, the renal clearance was 0.57 +/- 0.26 L/kg/hr, the fraction eliminated unchanged in the urine was 83% +/- 16%, and the apparent volume of distribution (Vdss) was 1.33 +/- 0.53 L/kg. The bioavailability determined from comparison of intravenous and oral area under the curve data was 71% +/- 27%. Results of this study support an initial famotidine dose of 20 mg intravenously or 40 mg orally every 12 hours in patients with CF who are older than 9 years of age.


Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis/drug therapy , Famotidine/pharmacokinetics , Histamine H2 Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Area Under Curve , Biological Availability , Child , Cross-Over Studies , Famotidine/administration & dosage , Famotidine/blood , Female , Histamine H2 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Histamine H2 Antagonists/blood , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged
2.
J Anal Toxicol ; 19(7): 581-90, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8577182

ABSTRACT

Ten human volunteers, naive to amphetamines and divided into two groups of five each, were given an oral dose of 30 mg/70 kg D-methamphetamine in one of two different paradigms: the initial dose at 0930 h or the initial dose at 2130 h. One week later, each subject was crossed over with regard to time but given the same dose. A total of 214 urine specimens were collected either prior to dosing or at each micturition for a 12-h period post dose. Specimens were analyzed on a blind basis for methamphetamine and one of its metabolites, amphetamine, by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using coinjection of extracted sample and pentafluoropropionic anhydride and selected-ion monitoring. Approximately 20% of the D-methamphetamine was recovered unchanged from the urine specimens, and 2% was recovered as amphetamine. The mean urine methamphetamine concentration in both groups reached a maximum within 4-6 h and declined thereafter. A residual amount of methamphetamine was found in some predose specimens at the crossover evaluation, reflecting that methamphetamine may be detected in urine for up to 7 days. The amphetamine concentration reached a plateau by 4-6 h. This observation coupled with the finding that all subjects excreted approximately 2% of the methamphetamine dose as amphetamine suggested a saturable process for its biotransformation. Concentrations of both methamphetamine and amphetamine tended to be higher, but were not significantly different, for night administration. Methamphetamine concentrations were consistently greater than the 500-ng/mL cutoff in most post-dosing specimens, whereas amphetamine concentrations generally did not achieve the 200-ng/mL cutoff specified by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) guidelines for GC-MS confirmation of methamphetamine. Some specimens containing methamphetamine had no amphetamine metabolite. The current guidelines would have resulted in 90.2% of the specimens containing methamphetamine being ruled negative by confirmation following either night or day administration, whereas one subject following the initial day administration and another following night crossover administration would have been judged positive at most time intervals. These findings suggest that the current SAMHSA guidelines select for individual metabolic variations and that GC-MS confirmation of methamphetamine will result in most occasional users being ruled negative following an oral dose of methamphetamine while some will be ruled positive.


Subject(s)
Amphetamine/urine , Methamphetamine/urine , Administration, Oral , Cross-Over Studies , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Methamphetamine/administration & dosage , Reference Standards , Stereoisomerism , Substance-Related Disorders , United States , United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
3.
J Pediatr ; 125(5 Pt 1): 805-11, 1994 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7965438

ABSTRACT

In an effort to explain the increased incidence of serum sickness-like reactions (SSLR) in patients receiving cefaclor, we used an in vitro murine microsomal system as a surrogate for in vivo hepatic drug biotransformation. Lymphocytes from three groups of subjects were exposed to a nonselective mixture of cefaclor metabolites. After an 18-hour incubation of lymphocytes with these metabolites, cells were examined for viability by trypan blue exclusion. The subject groups consisted of patients with a previous history of SSLR after cefaclor therapy (n = 19), patients who experienced adverse reactions to cefaclor suggestive of immediate hypersensitivity (n = 11), and control subjects who had previously tolerated at least two courses of cefaclor therapy without adverse effect (n = 9). Additionally, immediate family members of six subjects with cefaclor-associated SSLR were studied. Lymphocyte killing was 100% greater than baseline (i.e., a non-drug-containing control) in subjects with SSLR compared with those with immediate hypersensitivity reactions (4% cell death above baseline; p < 0.001) and nonaffected control subjects (6% cell death above baseline; p < 0.001). Family studies were consistent with a pattern of maternal inheritance; five of six mothers who had not received cefaclor had a positive (i.e., > or = 35% cell death above baseline) in vitro cytotoxic response. Other studies confirmed the requirement for biotransformation of the parent drug to elicit cell death, demonstrated specificity of the reaction to cefaclor, illustrated a lack of cross-reactivity to cephalexin in subjects with SSLR to cefaclor, and verified the reproducibility of the reaction over time in an affected subject. Our findings indicate that cefaclor associated SSLR may be a unique adverse drug reaction that requires biotransformation of the parent drug and may result from inherited defects in the metabolism of reactive intermediates. Furthermore, this condition can be retrospectively confirmed with an in vitro lymphocyte-based cytotoxicity assay.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Cefaclor/adverse effects , Cephalexin/adverse effects , Lymphocytes/drug effects , Microsomes, Liver/drug effects , Serum Sickness/chemically induced , Acetaminophen/pharmacokinetics , Adolescent , Adult , Biotransformation , Cefaclor/pharmacokinetics , Cell Death/drug effects , Cephalexin/pharmacokinetics , Child , Child, Preschool , Cytotoxicity Tests, Immunologic , Female , Humans , Infant , Lymphocytes/immunology , Lymphocytes/pathology , Male , Microsomes, Liver/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serum Sickness/blood , Serum Sickness/immunology , Serum Sickness/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...