Borderline personality disorder and aggressive behavior: A study based on the DSM-5 alternative model.

INTRODUCTION: Unplanned reactive aggressive acts are a clinical feature of particular interest in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The early identification of personality traits correlated to aggressive behavior is certainly desirable in BDP populations. This study analyzes a clinical sample of 122 adult outpatients with BPD referred to Adult Mental Health Services of the Department of Mental Health of Bologna, in Italy. METHODS: The study examines the relationship with personality facets of the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD), Personality Inventory for DSM (PID-5), with respect to the four main components of aggression measured by the Aggression Questionnaire (AQ): hostility, anger, verbal and physical aggression. Using robust regression models, the relationships between PID-5 facets and domains and the aggression components under consideration were identified. RESULTS: Verbal and physical aggression in our sample of BPD outpatients is mainly associated to PID-5 antagonism domain. Physically aggressive behavior is also related to callousness facet. CONCLUSIONS: The traits most consistently associated with aggression were the domain of Antagonism and the facet of Hostility. The study findings highlight the need for clinicians working with individuals with BPD to pay particular attention to traits of hostility, callousness, and hostility to understand aggression.

Diagnostic shift in first episode psychosis: Results from the 2-year follow-up of the "Parma Early Psychosis" program.

PURPOSE: Although the stability of current diagnostic criteria for people with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) is essential for treatment, it still remains poorly investigated. As its examination necessarily requires a prospective evaluation of diagnostic trajectories, the aims of the current longitudinal investigation were: (a) to assess diagnostic changes in an Italian FEP population treated within an "Early Intervention in Psychosis" service during a 2-year follow-up period, and (b) to identify potential sociodemographic and clinical moderators of diagnostic instability at entry. METHODS: All participants were FEP individuals, aged 12-35 years. Their primary diagnosis was formulated both at baseline and at the end of the follow-up. At entry, they also completed the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. As measure of diagnostic stability, the Kappa statistic was first calculated. The associations of diagnostic shift with baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were then analyzed using a logistic model with the diagnostic change as dependent variable. Finally, a propensity score was calculated, based on logistic analysis results. RESULTS: 221 (50.1 %) FEP participants changed their initial diagnosis. The highest prospective diagnostic stability was found for initial diagnosis of schizophrenia (93.9 %) and affective spectrum psychoses (92.4 %). Diagnostic instability was high for initial diagnosis of brief psychotic disorder (100 %), schizophreniform disorder (100 %) and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified (92.1 %). The best predictors of diagnostic change were previous contact with neuropsychiatry services, shorter duration of untreated psychosis and higher baseline levels of disorganization. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic stability is crucial for treatment and clinical decision making. Addressing instability in FEP diagnoses and detecting its moderators at entry are important challenges for future diagnostic development of early psychosis.

Effectiveness of community hospital post-acute care on mortality, re-admission, institutionalization, and activation of a home care programme in Emilia-Romagna region, Italy.

BACKGROUND: In Italy, there is scant evidence on the impact of Community Hospitals (CHs) on clinical outcomes. AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of CHs versus long-term care hospital or inpatient rehabilitation facilities on mortality, re-admission, institutionalization, and activation of a home care programme in the Emilia-Romagna Region (ERR-Italy) after acute hospitalisation. METHODS: We implemented a cohort study drawing upon the ERR Administrative Healthcare Database System and including hospital episodes of ERR residents subject ≥ 65 years, discharged from a public or private hospital with a medical diagnosis to a CH or to usual care between 2017 and 2019. To control for confounding, we applied a propensity score matching. RESULTS: Patients transferred to CHs had a significantly lower risk of dying but an increased risk of being readmitted to community or acute hospital within 30/90 days from discharge. The hazard of institutionalisation within 30/90 days was significantly lower in the whole population of the CH exposed group but not among patients with cardiac or respiratory chronic diseases or diabetes. The activation of a home care program within 90 days was slightly higher for those who were transferred to a CH. DISCUSSION: The findings of our study show mixed effects on outcomes of patients transferred to CHs compared to those who followed the post-acute usual care and should be taken with cautious as could be affected by the so-called 'confounding by indication'. CONCLUSIONS: The study contributes to the intermediate care available evidence from a region with a well-established care provision through CHs.

The impact of Community Health Centers on inappropriate use of emergency services.

Community Health Centers offer coordinated and comprehensive responses to primary care needs. Our study aims at assessing whether the introduction of such organizational model improved health outcomes measured by inappropriate emergency visits among diabetics in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy. Using difference-in-differences methods within a staggered treatment setting, we estimate the effect of Community Health Center participation on inappropriate hospital emergency visits between year 2010 and year 2016. We distinguish between emergency department admissions for varying time spans, occurring at daytime during working days, at night-time, as well as during weekends. We show that, the causal effect of the adoption of the community care model leads to a reduction in the probability of inappropriate admissions by an amount ranging between 1.6 and 1.7% points during working days at daytime, with large facilities responsible for most gains by experiencing a decrease ranging between 4 and 3% points. Conversely, we detect no difference at night-time and during weekends. Our results point out that the coordinated care model increases appropriateness among vulnerable patients, and that extending opening hours and the range of services can further enhance such benefits.

Reorganizing territorial healthcare to avoid inappropriate ED visits: does the spread of Community Health Centres make Walk-in-Clinics redundant?

BACKGROUND: Community care has recently been restructured with the development of Community Health Centres (CHCs), forcing a general rethink on the survival of previous organizational solutions adopted to reduce inappropriate ED access, for example Walk-in-Clinics (WiCs). METHODS: We focus on the Italian Emilia-Romagna Region that has made huge investments in CHC development, whilst failing to proceed at a uniform rate from area to area. Estimating panel count data models for the period 2015-2018, we pursue two goals. First we test the existence of a "CHC effect", choosing five urban cities with different degree of development of the CHC model and assessing whether, all else being equal, patients treated by GPs who have their premises inside the CHC show a lower need to seek inappropriate care (Aim 1). Second, we focus our attention on Walk-in-Clinics, investigating the long-established WiC in the city of Parma that currently coexists with three CHCs recently established in the same catchment area. In this case we try to assess whether, and to what extent, the progressive development of the CHCs in the city of Parma has been affecting the dynamics of WiC access (Aim 2). RESULTS: As regards Aim 1, we show that CHCs reduce the probability of inappropriate patient access to emergency care. As regards Aim 2, in the city of Parma patients whose GP belongs to the CHC are less likely to visit the WiC on a workday, with no significant change during the weekend when CHCs are closed, questioning the need to maintain them both in the same area when the CHC model is fully implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the hypothesis that expanding access to primary care settings diminishes inappropriate ED use. In addition, our findings suggest that where CHCs and WiCs coexist in the same area, it may be advisable to implement strategies that bring WiC activities into step with CHC-based general primary care reforms to avoid duplication.

Disease management in diabetes care: When involving GPs improves patient compliance and health outcomes.

Although the study of the association between interventions in primary care and health outcomes continues to produce mixed findings, programs designed to promote the greater compliance of General Practitioners and their diabetic patients with guidelines have been increasingly introduced worldwide, in an attempt to achieve better quality diabetes care through the enhanced standardisation of patient supervision. In this study, we use clinical data from the Diabetes Register of one large Local Health Authority (LHAs) in Italy's Emilia-Romagna Region for the period 2012-2015. Firstly, we investigate whether GPs' participation in the local Diabetes Management Program (DMP) leads to improved patient compliance with regional guidelines. Secondly, we test whether the monitoring activities prescribed for diabetics by the Regional diabetes guidelines have a positive impact on patients' health outcomes and increase appropriateness in health care utilization. Our results show that such a Program, which aims to increase GPs' involvement and cooperation in following the Regional guidelines, achieves its goal of improved patient compliance with the prescribed actions. In turn, through the implementation of the DMP and the greater involvement of physicians, Regional policies have succeeded in promoting better health outcomes and improved appropriateness of health care utilization.

There is no such thing as a (gluten-)free lunch: Higher food prices and the cost for coeliac consumers.

A lifelong gluten-free diet is the only available treatment for coeliac disease at present. However, the high price of gluten-free substitute foods is likely to generate a welfare loss for consumers who drop gluten from their diet. Using original data on retail prices in four major UK supermarkets and consumption data from the UK Living Cost and Food Survey, we simulate the welfare change associated to a switch to the gluten-free diet. Within the "Bread and Cereals" category, retail price data show that the average price of gluten-free products is £1.12/100g relative to £ 0.59/100g of gluten-containing products. Our estimates indicate that on average in the UK coeliac consumers have to pay an extra £ 10 per week to maintain their utility levels prior to the dietary switch. This correspond to 29% of the weekly food budget. Results by income quartile are suggestive of regressive effects and the welfare loss for low-income consumers is estimated at 36% of their food budget compared to 24% of high-income consumers.