Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Chest ; 135(6): 1580-1587, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19141526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Detection of small indeterminate pulmonary nodules (4 to 10 mm in diameter) in clinical practice is increasing, largely because of increased utilization and improved imaging technology. Although there currently exists software for CT scan machines that automate nodule volume estimation, the imprecision associated with volume estimates is particularly poor for nodules < or = 6 mm in diameter, with greater imprecision associated with increasing CT scan slice thickness. This study examined the effects of the volume estimation error associated with four CT scan slice thicknesses (0.625, 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 mm) on estimates of volume doubling time (VDT) for solid nodules of various sizes. METHODS: Data reflecting the accuracy of 1,624 automated volume estimations were obtained from experiments incorporating volume estimation software, performed on a commercially available lung phantom. These data informed mathematical simulations that were used to estimate imprecision around VDT estimates for hypothetical pairs of volume estimates for a given solid pulmonary nodule observed at different time points. RESULTS: The confidence intervals around the VDT estimates were extremely wide for 2.50- and 5.00-mm slice thicknesses, often encompassing values traditionally associated with both benignity and malignity for simulated 1- and 2-mm growths in diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the inaccuracy in automated volume estimation, the confidence a clinician should have in estimating VDT should be highly dependent on the degree of observed growth and on the CT scan slice thickness. The performance of CT scanners with slice thicknesses of > or = 2.5 mm for assessing growth in pulmonary nodules is essentially inadequate for 1-mm changes in nodule diameter.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Confidence Intervals , Humans , Linear Models , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pattern Recognition, Automated , Phantoms, Imaging , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tumor Burden
2.
Radiology ; 247(2): 400-8, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18430874

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate in a phantom the effects of reconstruction kernel, field of view (FOV), and section thickness on automated measurements of pulmonary nodule volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spherical and lobulated pulmonary nodules 3-15 mm in diameter were placed in a commercially available lung phantom and scanned by using a 16-section computed tomographic (CT) scanner. Nodule volume (V) was determined by using the diameters of 27 spherical nodules and the mass and density values of 29 lobulated nodules measured by using the formulas V = (4/3)pi r(3) (spherical nodules) and V = 1000 x (M/D) (lobulated nodules) as reference standards, where r is nodule radius; M, nodule mass; and D, wax density. Experiments were performed to evaluate seven reconstruction kernels and the independent effects of FOV and section thickness. Automated nodule volume measurements were performed by using computer-assisted volume measurement software. General linear regression models were used to examine the independent effects of each parameter, with percentage overestimation of volume as the dependent variable of interest. RESULTS: There was no substantial difference in the accuracy of volume estimations across the seven reconstruction kernels. The bone reconstruction kernel was deemed optimal on the basis of the results of a series of statistical analyses and other qualitative findings. Overall, volume accuracy was significantly associated (P < .0001) with larger reference standard-measured nodule diameter. There was substantial overestimation of the volumes of the 3-5-mm nodules measured by using the volume measurement software. Decreasing the FOV facilitated no significant improvement in the precision of lobulated nodule volume measurements. The accuracy of volume estimations--particularly those for small nodules--was significantly (P < .0001) affected by section thickness. CONCLUSION: Substantial, highly variable overestimation of volume occurs with decreasing nodule diameter. A section thickness that enables the acquisition of at least three measurements along the z-axis should be used to measure the volumes of larger pulmonary nodules.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Linear Models , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Prospective Studies , Reference Standards , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...