Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692942

ABSTRACT

The objective of this clinical retrospective study was to analyze the prevalence and distribution of different avian and exotic animals presented to 2 exotics-only veterinary hospital in Hong Kong and Taiwan over a 1 year period. Exotic companion mammals, predominated by rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) that were often diagnosed with fractures, were the most commonly presented group of patients in the hospital in Hong Kong while second most of that in Taiwan, with dental disease being commonly presented in the species. This study provided a general overview of avian and exotic patients presented to exotics-only practices in the East Asia region.

2.
Med Mycol ; 57(4): 421-428, 2019 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30085075

ABSTRACT

Amphotericin B is widely used for the treatment of Macrorhabdus ornithogaster infections. To date, however, there have been no randomized controlled trials confirming its efficacy where cure was confirmed by postmortem examination. To determine the efficacy of amphotericin B against M. ornithogaster, a three-part study was undertaken. Treatment outcomes of M. ornithogaster infected birds treated amphotericin B were reviewed. A pilot treatment trial with two naturally infected birds (Melopsittacus undulatus and Agapornis roseicollis) was undertaken, administering amphotericin B at 100 mg/kg twice daily for 30 days. Finally, a randomized controlled trial using experimentally infected chickens treated with amphotericin B at 25 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg twice daily for 10 days was performed. Retrospective analysis indicated treatment failure in 80.4% of 36 cases that met the inclusion criteria. The pilot study showed that amphotericin B did not clear, but significantly decreased Macrorhabdus ornithogaster burden, followed by profound rebound effect of the number of organisms shed in the feces. Finally, the randomized controlled trial found that amphotericin B given at 100 mg/kg did not clear, but significantly decreased the burden of M. ornithogaster compared with both the 25 mg/kg group (P = .037) and the no treatment control group (P = .001). A strong curvilinear correlation between body weight and M. ornithogaster infection burden was present in the infected chickens. These findings represent treatment failure in three scenarios and indicate that treatment with amphotericin B has poor efficacy against Macrorhabdus ornithogaster.


Subject(s)
Amphotericin B/administration & dosage , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Bird Diseases/microbiology , Birds , Drug Resistance, Fungal , Mycoses/veterinary , Saccharomycetales/drug effects , Amphotericin B/pharmacology , Animals , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Australia , Chickens , Colony Count, Microbial , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Male , Mycoses/microbiology , Random Allocation , Saccharomycetales/isolation & purification , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...