Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 16(23): 2900-2914, 2023 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092496

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of published head-to-head comparisons between different paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons. More prospective safety data to support the health care economic reimbursement processes are needed. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the safety and efficacy of the Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon (DCB) (Biotronik AG) for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease caused by stenosis, restenosis, or occlusion of the femoral and/or popliteal arteries. METHODS: A total of 302 patients were randomized 1:1 and assigned to the Passeo-18 Lux DCB (study device) group or the IN.PACT Admiral DCB (control device, Medtronic Vascular) group for testing of noninferiority. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of freedom from device-/procedure-related death through 30 days postindex procedure, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, 130 of 134 patients in the IN.PACT Admiral group had freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (97.0%) compared with 137 of 141 patients in the Passeo-18 Lux group (97.2%). The primary safety endpoint showed 96.3% in the control group vs 95.7% in the study device group. The null hypothesis of inferiority on both efficacy and safety was rejected. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency at 1 year was 88.7% in the control arm vs 91.5% in the study device arm. CONCLUSIONS: The Passeo-18 Lux and the IN.PACT Admiral DCBs demonstrate comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Humans , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Time Factors , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Vascular Patency
2.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 45(12): 1855-1859, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36058996

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although effectiveness and safety of many different paclitaxel coated balloons in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are extensively studied, there is a lack of direct head-to-head comparison studies. To meet this need and to avoid potential "class-effects", the BIOPACT was set up. The purpose is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Passeo-18 Lux DCB (Biotronik) for treatment of patients with symptomatic PAD due to femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: 302 patients are randomized in a 1:1 manner to treatment with either the Passeo-18 Lux DCB or the IN.PACT Admiral DCB (Medtronic) for testing of a formal non-inferiority hypothesis. The participants will be followed for 5 years. The primary efficacy endpoint is freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 12 months, defined as any re-intervention at the target lesion due to symptoms, drop of ankle brachial index (ABI) > 20% or > 0.15 compared to post-procedural ABI. Primary safety endpoint is a composite of freedom from device/procedure-related death through 30 days post-index procedure, freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) through 12 months post-index procedure. Secondary endpoints can be found at clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT03884257. DISCUSSION: As full enrolment was reached by the beginning of September, the investigators expect complete analysis of the primary endpoints by the end of 2022; Meanwhile preliminary results will be disclosed during 2022. As in terms of randomized head-to-head efficacy and safety analysis, this study on paclitaxel coated balloons may provide additional information to clinicians and healthcare providers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03884257 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2, Randomized trial.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Humans , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Vascular Patency , Time Factors , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/pathology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 36(5): 1393-8, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23580113

ABSTRACT

We describe a new, useful embolization technique applied to occlude narrow vessel branches (≤ 1.5 mm (0.06") in diameter) by deployment of one hydrocoil, through a microcatheter, in a way similar to the way in which one might navigate through the vascular lumen with a guidewire.


Subject(s)
Arterial Occlusive Diseases/therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Hemorrhage/therapy , Vascular Fistula/therapy , Aged , Fatal Outcome , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...