ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Genetic kidney diseases contribute a significant portion of kidney diseases in children and young adults. Nephrogenetics is a rapidly evolving subspecialty; however, in the clinical setting, increased use of genetic testing poses implementation challenges. Consequently, we established a national nephrogenetics clinic to apply a multidisciplinary model. METHODS: Patients were referred from different pediatric or adult nephrology units across the country if their primary nephrologist suspected an undiagnosed genetic kidney disease. We determined the diagnostic rate and observed the effect of diagnosis on medical care. We also discuss the requirements of a nephrogenetics clinic in terms of logistics, recommended indications for referral, and building a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: Over 24 months, genetic evaluation was completed for a total of 74 unrelated probands, with an age range of 10 days to 72 years. The most common phenotypes included congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract, nephrotic syndrome or unexplained proteinuria, nephrocalcinosis/nephrolithiasis, tubulopathies, and unexplained kidney failure. Over 80% of patients were referred due to clinical suspicion of an undetermined underlying genetic diagnosis. A molecular diagnosis was reached in 42/74 probands, yielding a diagnostic rate of 57%. Of these, over 71% of diagnoses were made via next generation sequencing (gene panel or exome sequencing). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a substantial fraction of genetic kidney etiologies among previously undiagnosed individuals which influenced subsequent clinical management. Our results support that nephrogenetics, a rapidly evolving field, may benefit from well-defined multidisciplinary co-management administered by a designated team of nephrologist, geneticist, and bioinformatician. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Subject(s)
Genetic Testing , Kidney Diseases , Child , Humans , Kidney Diseases/genetics , Phenotype , Referral and Consultation , Exome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
Relapses of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome are traditionally treated with prednisone 2 mg/kg/day or 60 mg/m2/day. Retrospective data support the use of lower doses. We designed a prospective randomized pilot study to investigate the efficacy of different doses in achieving remission of steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome relapse. The cohort included 30 children with relapsed steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome, mean age 6.3 ± 3 years and mean disease duration 2.2 ± 1.8 years. The children were randomized to receive 2, 1.5, or 1 mg/kg/day prednisone. The corresponding times to response, defined as the first of 3 consecutive days without proteinuria, were 7.2 ± 1.4, 10.2 ± 5.1, and 9 ± 3.3 days; the difference between the 1.5 and 2 mg/kg/day groups was statistically significant. One patient each in the 1 mg/kg/day and the 1.5 mg/kg/day groups failed to respond and were switched to 2 mg/kg/day, leading to a response after 3 and 10 days, respectively. Mean cumulative prednisone doses in the 3 groups were 45.5 ± 3.4, 42.7 ± 25.9, and 24.9 ± 7.4 mg/kg, respectively (P < 0.05).Conclusion: In the present study, treatment of childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome relapse with prednisone 1-1.5 mg/kg/day led to a significantly lower cumulative dose than the standard dose. Treatment with a lower dose may be equally safe and effective to the standard dose.What is Known:⢠Relapses of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome are traditionally treated with standard-dose steroids.⢠Treatment with corticosteroids may have significant adverse effects mainly with long-term use.What is New:⢠Treatment of steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome relapse with 1-1.5 mg/kg/day prednisone may lead to a significantly lower cumulative dose.⢠Treatment with a lower steroid dose may be as effective as the standard dose in achieving remission of steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome relapse.
