Retrospective and Prospective Outcomes of Distal Radioulnar Joint Prosthesis Arthroplasty at a Single Center.

Purpose: Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis can cause painful and limited motion of the forearm leading to decreased function. When conservative treatment options are exhausted, surgical treatments are the next step. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively and prospectively evaluate outcomes of Scheker DRUJ total arthroplasty at a single center and add to the limited data on this procedure. Methods: In a retrospective and prospective cohort of 12 patients, 13 DRUJ prosthetics implanted from 2014 to 2021 were evaluated from a single center. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with the procedure, including comparisons of preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and willingness to repeat the procedure. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, subjective grip strength, need for hardware revision, subsequent procedures, and postoperative complaints. Results: Out of 12 patients that were at least 1-year after surgery from DRUJ arthroplasty, 1 was deceased at the time of final survey and 1 underwent bilateral DRUJ arthroplasty. Seven of 12 available patients were surveyed over the phone. On average, patient range of motion after surgery was 76° in each direction for pronation and supination. There was a clinically significant improvement in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and a statistically significant improvement in visual analog scale pain rating. Seventy-five percent of patients surveyed were satisfied with their outcomes and would undergo the surgery again. Only one patient required additional surgery, and there were no instances of hardware failure at an average follow-up of 40 months. Conclusions: Our study has shown positive outcomes with decrease in pain, improvement in function via Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand evaluation, and subjective patient satisfaction, with a 100% prosthesis survival rate. The DRUJ arthroplasty prosthesis is a viable alternative to other DRUJ salvage procedures. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

Variability of glenoid labral tear patterns: a study of 280 sequential surgical cases.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid labrum tears are a common cause of shoulder pain and instability and tear patterns have historically been ascribed into categorical descriptions such as anterior, posterior, and superior labral tears (SLAP [superior labrum anterior and posterior]) with multiple subtypes. Although often quoted as representing no more than 10% of instabilities, posterior shoulder instability may be more common than previously recognized. The purpose of this study was to review observed labral tear patterns and compare incidence and morphologies to historical descriptions. METHODS: All patients undergoing arthroscopic or open labral repair (Current Procedural Terminology codes 29806, 29807, 23455, 23460, 23462, 23465) by 2 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons from July 2012 to May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Labral tears were categorized into 3 groups: exclusively anterior to the midline of the glenoid, exclusively posterior, and those crossing the midline of the glenoid. Chief complaint, mechanism of injury, hand dominance, preoperative MRI interpretation by surgeon, and independent radiologist were analyzed for each tear type. RESULTS: During the 7-year period, 280 patients underwent arthroscopic or open labral repair. Sixty percent of tears were traumatic, with dislocation being the most common traumatic mechanism at 31.4%. Ten distinct tear patterns were identified: 3 types of 90° tears (anteroinferior, posteroinferior, and posterosuperior), 4 types of 180° tears (anterior, posterior, inferior, and SLAP), 2 types of 270° tears (anteroinferior and anterosuperior), and 360° labral tears. A total of 134 tears (47.9%) were classified as posterior, and 72 tears (25.7%) were anterior. Seventy-four tears (26.4%) were combined anterior-posterior tears. Labral tears involving some portion of the posterior labrum constituted 74% of tears. A significant association between tear location and primary complaint (P < .001) was noted. Patients with anterior tears complained of only instability in 62.5% of cases, and only pain in 22%. Patients with posterior labral tears complained primarily of pain in 68% of cases, and instability in 21%. There was an accurate preoperative diagnosis given by both radiologists and surgeons on 30% (n = 63) of the tears. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variety of labral tear patterns identified at the time of surgery, and the incidence of posterior labral tears is higher than previously described. Isolated Bankart lesions are relatively rare and are often associated with more extensive labral lesions. Patients with posterior labral pathology more often complain of pain rather than instability, whereas patients with anterior labral tears more often complain of instability.

Radial Tunnel Syndrome.

PURPOSE: Radial tunnel syndrome is defined as a compressive neuropathy of the posterior interosseus nerve. It is differentiated from posterior interosseus nerve compression by symptom profile. The purpose of this article is to review past and current literature on the topic and determine if there are any emerging treatment options for this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Traditionally, conservative management of Radial Tunnel syndrome has been relatively unsuccessful. As a result, patients afflicted by this neuropathy require operative intervention. Effectiveness of surgical decompression is variable and can range from 67 to 92% but currently remains the standard treatment. However, there are some conservative treatment options that have been recently reported that show promising results. Such treatments include dry needling of the affected area and ultrasound guided corticosteroid injections to hydro dissect around the posterior interosseus nerve at sites of compression. Radial tunnel syndrome is an uncommon and unique peripheral neuropathy. It involves the posterior interosseus nerve however it can be differentiated from PIN syndrome based on the symptom profile. There are various compressive etiologies that can cause a patient to become symptomatic; therefore it is important to critically assess the patient and their symptoms and use appropriate imaging to determine the cause and appropriate treatment. Typically, conservative treatments are attempted first. Traditionally, conservative therapy is unsuccessful and operative decompression is necessary. However, current literature highlights various new nonsurgical options that suggest some promise and could be alternatives to surgical decompression.

Dynamic Nerve Compression of Guyon Canal Secondary to Variation of the Deep Branch of the Ulnar Artery: Etiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome.

A patient presented with an ulnar-sided left wrist injury that was sustained while batting. Advanced imaging was obtained to rule out common causes of nerve compression and evaluate the patient's anatomy. Dynamic nerve conduction studies were necessary to confirm a diagnosis of nerve compression. Failing conservative treatments, the patient underwent exploration of Guyon canal and decompression of the ulnar nerve with complete symptom resolution. The patient presented a unique diagnostic challenge because he did not display the typical findings of chronic nerve entrapment syndromes. To the best of our knowledge, dynamic nerve compression at Guyon's canal has not previously been described. It is important to use a systematic approach to diagnosis, eliminating all other sources of compression. With appropriate diagnostic tools, nerve decompression can result in symptom relief.