Ultrasound Performed by Emergency Physicians for Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by emergency physicians (EP) has emerged as an effective alternative to radiology department ultrasounds for the diagnosis of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Systematic reviews suggested good sensitivity and specificity overall for EP-performed POCUS for DVT diagnosis, yet high levels of heterogeneity were reported. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to provide the most up-to-date estimates of the accuracy of EP-performed POCUS for diagnosis of DVT and to explore potential correlations with test performance. We performed systematic searches in MEDLINE and Embase for original, primary data articles from January 2012-June 2021 comparing the efficacy of POCUS performed by EPs to the local standard. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 for individual articles are reported. We obtained summary measures of sensitivity, specificity, and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using bivariate mixed-effects regression models. We performed meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses as planned in the protocol CRD42021268799 submitted to PROSPERO. Results: Fifteen publications fit the inclusion criteria, totaling 2,511 examinations. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90% (95% CI 82%-95%) and 95% (CI 91%-97%), respectively. Subgroup analyses by EP experience found significantly better accuracy for exams performed by EP specialists (93%, CI 88%-97%) vs trainees (77%, CI 60%-94%). Specificity for EP specialists (97%, CI 94%-99%) was higher than for trainees (87%, CI 76%-99%, P = 0.01). Three-point compression ultrasound (CUS) was more sensitive than two-point CUS but was only statistically significant when limited to EP specialists (92% vs 88%, P = 0.07, and 95% vs 88%, P = 0.02, respectively). Conclusion: Point-of-care ultrasound performed by emergency physicians is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of suspected DVT when performed by trained attending EPs. Three-point compression ultrasound examination may be more sensitive than two-point CUS.

Nonautoimmune Hyperthyroidism Caused by a Somatic Mosaic GNAS Mutation Involving Part of the Thyroid Gland.

Nonautoimmune hyperthyroidism caused by activating mutations in the GNAS gene is a rare condition. In this study, we report a five-year-old girl diagnosed with nonautoimmune hyperthyroidism and tall stature harboring a somatic mosaic gain-of-function mutation in the GNAS gene (NM_080425.3: c.2530C>T;p.Arg844Cys previously reported as NM_000516.5:c.601C>T;p.Arg201Cys) and referred to thereafter as R201C, in three of four quadrants of the thyroid gland. Provision of a molecular diagnosis may avoid unnecessary complete ablation of the thyroid gland.

T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase regulates bone resorption and whole-body insulin sensitivity through its expression in osteoblasts.

Insulin signaling in osteoblasts contributes to whole-body glucose homeostasis in the mouse and in humans by increasing the activity of osteocalcin. The osteoblast insulin signaling cascade is negatively regulated by ESP, a tyrosine phosphatase dephosphorylating the insulin receptor. Esp is one of many tyrosine phosphatases expressed in osteoblasts, and this observation suggests that other protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) may contribute to the attenuation of insulin receptor phosphorylation in this cell type. In this study, we sought to identify an additional PTP(s) that, like ESP, would function in the osteoblast to regulate insulin signaling and thus affect activity of the insulin-sensitizing hormone osteocalcin. For that purpose, we used as criteria expression in osteoblasts, regulation by isoproterenol, and ability to trap the insulin receptor in a substrate-trapping assay. Here we show that the T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase (TC-PTP) regulates insulin receptor phosphorylation in the osteoblast, thus compromising bone resorption and bioactivity of osteocalcin. Accordingly, osteoblast-specific deletion of TC-PTP promotes insulin sensitivity in an osteocalcin-dependent manner. This study increases the number of genes involved in the bone regulation of glucose homeostasis.

Intermittent injections of osteocalcin improve glucose metabolism and prevent type 2 diabetes in mice.

The uncarboxylated form of the osteoblast-specific secreted molecule osteocalcin is a hormone favoring glucose handling and increasing energy expenditure. As a result, the absence of osteocalcin leads to glucose intolerance in mice, while genetically modified mice with an increase in uncarboxylated osteocalcin are protected from type 2 diabetes and obesity. Here, we tested in the mouse the therapeutic potential of intermittent administration of osteocalcin. We found that daily injections of osteocalcin at either 3 or 30 ng/g/day significantly improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in mice fed a normal diet. This was attributable, in part, to an increase in both ß-cell mass and insulin secretion. When mice were fed a high-fat diet (HFD), daily injections of osteocalcin partially restored insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance. Moreover, mice treated with intermittent osteocalcin injections displayed additional mitochondria in their skeletal muscle, had increased energy expenditure and were protected from diet-induced obesity. Finally, the hepatic steatosis induced by the HFD was completely rescued in mice receiving osteocalcin daily. Overall, these results provide evidence that daily injections of osteocalcin can improve glucose handling and prevent the development of type 2 diabetes.

Emergency department awareness of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: how frequently is risk assessment documented in patients with thrombosis?

Evidence-based guidelines recommend that heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) should be suspected whenever a patient develops thrombosis or thrombocytopenia 5 to 14 days after heparin initiation. The authors determined how frequently emergency department (ED) physicians document HIT risk assessment in patients presenting with thrombosis. Relevant data were extracted from the ED charts of 134 patients with venous or arterial thrombosis. Documentation (ie, notation of positive or negative findings) existed for recent heparin exposure in 7 (5.2%) of 134 charts, recent hospitalization in 33 (24.6%), history of thrombocytopenia in 0 (0%), and history of thrombosis in 62 (45.5%). Of 35 patients administered heparin in the ED, the preheparin platelet count was available for 19 (54.3%) and old records for 5 (14.3%). Thus, HIT risk assessment frequently remains undocumented for ED patients with thrombosis, including those administered heparin. Approaches to increase HIT awareness and facilitate HIT risk assessment and documentation in the ED may be needed.

Heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies in intensive care patients: an observational seroprevalence study.

Heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies mediate heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and, irrespective of thrombocytopenia, are associated with poorer outcomes in some patients. The prevalence of heparin-PF4 antibodies, including platelet-activating ones, in patients in the medical, neurotrauma, or shock-trauma intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear. In this single-center, observational study, heparin-PF4 antibodies (IgG/A/M) were measured by ELISA in 185 adults (median APACHE II score, 16) admitted to the medical (n = 27), neurotrauma (n = 96), or shock-trauma (n = 62) ICU and after 7 +/- 2 days. Seropositive patients and heparin-treated patients with unexplained, new-onset thrombocytopenia were also tested for platelet-activating antibodies using a serotonin release assay (SRA). Of 185 patients, seropositivity occurred in 20 patients (10.8%; 95% CI 6.7-16.2%) at admission and 54 (29.2%, 95% CI 22.8-36.3%) after 7 days (P < 0.001). Platelet-activating antibodies occurred in 4 seropositive patients at admission and 9 seropositive patients after 7 days (including in 1 patient at each assessment), each without thrombocytopenia or new thrombosis. Of 12 seropositive patients with platelet-activating antibodies, 6 had an ELISA optical density (OD) >1.0. ELISA-positive, SRA-negative, suspected HIT occurred in 1 patient. Heparin-PF4 antibodies are present in 10.8% of medical, neurotrauma, or shock-trauma ICU patients at admission and increase significantly to 29.2% within 7 days. Approximately 17-20% of seropositive ICU patients, often those with an ELISA OD >1.0, have platelet-activating heparin-PF4 antibodies.

A paradigm of integrative physiology, the crosstalk between bone and energy metabolisms.

Thanks to integrative physiology, new relationships between organs and homeostatic functions have emerged. This approach to physiology based on a whole organism approach has allowed the bone field to make fundamental progress. In the last decade, clinical observations and scientific evidences in vivo have uncovered that fat with leptin controls bone mass through brain including a hypothalamic relay and sympathetic nervous system. The finding that energy metabolism affects bone remodelling suggested that in an endocrine perspective, a feedback loop should exist. Beside its classical functions, bone can now be considered as a true endocrine organ secreting osteocalcin, a hormone pharmacologically active on glucose and fat metabolism. Indeed osteocalcin stimulates insulin secretion and beta-cell proliferation. Simultaneously, osteocalcin acts on adipocytes to induce Adiponectin which secondarily reduce insulin resistance. This cross regulation between bone and energy metabolism offers novel therapeutic targets in type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis.

Venous and arterial thromboembolism in severe sepsis.

The burden of thromboembolism (TE) in severe sepsis is largely unknown. We assessed the prevalence of venous and arterial TE in patients with severe sepsis over a four-week period. We performed a retrospective analysis of a pooled database of three randomized, placebo-controlled trials of two novel pharmacological agents for the treatment of severe sepsis, drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) and secretory phospholipase A2 inhibitor (sPLA(2)I). The study was conducted at intensive care units of the participating institutions. A total of 2,649 patients with known or suspected infection and sepsis-associated acute organ dysfunction were enrolled in the three trials and were assigned to treatment groups (DrotAA=850; sPLA2I=578; placebo=1221). The database was queried for venous and arterial TE, using investigator reports of serious adverse events. Eighty-four of 2,649 patients (3.2%; 95% confidence interval, 2.5% to 3.9%) developed at least one thromboembolic event over 28 days. Nearly three-quarters of episodes were atheroembolic (n=62); 25% involved the deep venous system (n=25). Ischemic stroke (n=30) and venous thromboembolism (n=25) each occurred in about 1% of patients. Ischemic stroke and acute coronary syndrome had a higher peak incidence during the first five days compared to venous TE onset, which was more constant over the 28-day period. Subgroup analysis by pooled treatment groups yielded TE rates of 2.0% (DrotAA), 3.5% (placebo), and 4.0% (sPLA2I), respectively. Clinically manifest TE occurred in about 3% of severe sepsis patients treated in the intensive care unit over a 28-day period. Arterial TE may be more common than previously recognized. More accurate estimates of TE prevalence and relationship to sepsis await future studies.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in emergency department admissions.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis exist, yet prophylaxis is underutilized and inadequately studied in the context of emergency department admissions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the rate of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in emergency department hospitalizations. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Urban, teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Adult emergency department admissions INTERVENTION: Alternating admissions through the emergency department over 1 month were reviewed. Exclusion criteria were: requiring full anticoagulation, hemodialysis, length of stay less than 2 days, psychiatric admission, and primary physician declined review. An established risk assessment tool classified thromboembolism risk. Appropriate prophylaxis was defined as currently accepted medical or mechanical prophylaxis if in need or no prophylaxis if not indicated. MEASUREMENTS: Factors associated with prophylaxis were considered significant if P < .05. RESULTS: Of 254 patients, 201 (79%) had indications for prophylaxis, of whom 65 (32%) received it. Seventy-eight percent of prophylaxis orders were written in the first day of hospitalization. Factors related to increased use of prophylaxis included use of standard order sets (OR = 3, P < .009) and increased risk of venous thromboembolism (P < .0001). Factors related to underuse included primary cardiovascular diagnosis (OR = 0.18, P < .0001) and age (OR = 0.97, P < .0001). Eighteen of 26 patients admitted for whom standard order sets were used (69%) received appropriate prophylaxis (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted through the emergency department are at high risk of venous thromboembolism. Despite this, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is underutilized and rarely started after the first day of hospitalization. Use of admission standard order sets on admission from the emergency department may increase thromboembolic prophylaxis.

Heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies in patients presenting to the ED with thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies, particularly platelet-activating ones, are at risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia if administered heparin. We determined the heparin-PF4 antibody prevalence in emergency department (ED) patients presenting with chest pain or symptoms of thrombosis. METHODS: Admission samples from 324 ED patients with chest pain or symptoms of thrombosis were tested for heparin-PF4 antibodies and, if positive, platelet-activating antibodies. RESULTS: Twenty-four (7.4%; 95% confidence interval, 4.8%-10.8%) patients had heparin-PF4 antibodies. Seropositivity occurred in 18 (9.2%) of 196 patients recently (< or =6 months) hospitalized vs 6 (4.7%) of 128 not recently hospitalized (P = .19), and in 16/231 (6.9%) patients with chest pain vs 8/93 (8.6%) with other thrombosis (P = .64). Of 22 seropositive patients retested, 8 (7 recently hospitalized) had platelet-activating antibodies. CONCLUSION: Heparin-PF4 antibody prevalence is 7.4% in ED patients with chest pain or thrombosis, with approximately 1 in 3 seropositive patients having platelet-activating antibodies. Alternative, nonheparin anticoagulation would be prudent in these at-risk patients.

How frequently is venous thromboembolism in heparin-treated patients associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia?

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving heparin for thromboprophylaxis or treatment may have new or recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) if immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs or for other reasons, eg, if anticoagulation fails. We estimated from the literature how frequently a patient presenting with VTE during or following heparin therapy has HIT-associated VTE. METHODS: A comprehensive, systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies using unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis or treatment in which new or recurrent VTE and serologically confirmed HIT were reported. From extracted study data, the proportion of patients with HIT-associated VTE relative to any VTE was calculated by heparin type and mode of administration. RESULTS: We identified 10 studies, some with multiple arms, that used unfractionated heparin (IV administration, 5 studies; subcutaneous administration, 3 studies) or subcutaneous LMWH (5 studies) and met analysis criteria. Across these studies, 386 of 6,219 heparin-treated patients had VTE, including 32 patients who also had HIT. The frequency of HIT-associated VTE among heparin-treated patients with VTE was comparable between IV and subcutaneous unfractionated heparin therapy (13.2% [17 of 129 patients] vs 12.4% [14 of 113 patients]; odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 2.3; p > 0.99) yet significantly different between unfractionated heparin and LMWH therapy (12.8% [31 of 242 patients] vs 0.7% [1 of 144 patients]; odds ratio, 21.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.8 to 156; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VTE is associated with HIT infrequently (< 1%) in LMWH-treated patients, yet often (approximately one in eight cases) in unfractionated heparin-treated patients. Physicians should suspect the possibility of HIT if VTE develops during or soon after unfractionated heparin use; if thrombocytopenia is present, alternative anticoagulation should be used until HIT is excluded.

Effects of argatroban therapy, demographic variables, and platelet count on thrombotic risks in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effects of the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban, patient demographics, and the platelet count on thrombotic risks in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a serious thrombotic condition, to determine if argatroban provides effective antithrombotic therapy in patients with HIT without increasing bleeding. DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed thrombotic outcomes in 882 HIT patients (697 patients receiving mean argatroban doses of 1.7 to 2.0 mug/kg/min for 5 to 7 days, plus 185 historical control subjects) from previously reported prospective studies. Time-to-event analyses of our primary end point-a thrombotic composite of death due to thrombosis, amputation secondary to HIT-associated thrombosis, or new thrombosis within 37 days-and the individual components were conducted, with hazard ratios estimated for treatment with and without adjustments for patient age, gender, race, weight, and baseline platelet count. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Argatroban, vs control, significantly reduced the thrombotic composite risk (HIT: hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.54, p < 0.001; HIT with thrombosis: hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.62, p < 0.001), regardless of covariate adjustments. More argatroban-treated patients than control subjects remained thrombotic event free during follow-up, regardless of whether baseline thrombosis was absent (91% vs 73%) or present (72% vs 50%). Argatroban significantly reduced new thrombosis (p < 0.001) and death due to thrombosis (p

Argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with hepatic dysfunction.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the dosing requirements in argatroban-treated patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and hepatic dysfunction, and compared efficacy and safety outcomes with historical control patients. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Inpatient setting. PATIENTS: Patients with hepatic dysfunction, defined as total bilirubin > 25.5 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL), aspartate aminotransferase >100 IU/L, and/or alanine aminotransferase >100 IU/L, were identified from previous multicenter, historical-controlled studies of argatroban therapy in HIT. INTERVENTIONS: Argatroban, adjusted to maintain activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) 1.5 to 3 times baseline in the experimental group, vs no direct thrombin inhibition in the historical control patients. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The analysis population included 82 argatroban patients and 34 historical control patients with hepatic impairment, of whom approximately 50% in each group had renal dysfunction (defined as a serum creatinine level > 1.3 mg/dL). The argatroban dosage was 1.6 +/- 1.1 microg/kg/min (mean +/- SD) over a mean 5-day course of therapy. Significantly lower doses were used in patients with elevated vs normal total bilirubin levels (0.8 +/- 0.6 microg/kg/min vs 1.7 +/- 0.8 microg/kg/min, p = 0.0063) and in patients with hepatic/renal dysfunction vs hepatic dysfunction alone (1.2 +/- 1.1 microg/kg/min vs 2.0 +/- 1.1 microg/kg/min, p < 0.001). The aPTT 24 h after argatroban initiation was 69 +/- 22 s, with 80% of patients having a therapeutic level of anticoagulation. Thirty-four argatroban-treated patients (41.5%) and 17 control patients (50.0%) experienced the 37-day composite end point of death, amputation, or new thrombosis (p = 0.32). Argatroban significantly reduced new thrombosis (8.5% vs 26.5%, p = 0.012). Major bleeding was similar between treatment groups (4.9% vs 2.9%, p = 0.684). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic dysfunction affects argatroban dosing, with reduced doses required particularly in patients with serum total bilirubin levels > 25.5 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL) or combined hepatic/renal dysfunction. Individual mean aPTT-adjusted doses typically remain > or = 0.5 microg/kg/min, supporting the recommendation of 0.5 microg/kg/min as a conservative initial dose for most patients with hepatic impairment. Argatroban, with proper initial dosing and monitoring, can provide safe and effective antithrombotic therapy in patients with HIT and hepatic impairment.

Interventions during donor care before lung transplantation.

Improvement in the ratio of PaO2 to the fraction of inspired oxygen and treatment of pulmonary infections in donors have been cited as important goals for improving lungs before implantation and restoring marginal lungs to the donor pool. Likewise, improving donor PaO2 is often critical for other organs during donor care. The common physiological mechanisms responsible for hypoxemia are ventilation/perfusion mismatching, abnormal oxygen diffusion, and hypoventilation. These mechanisms are discussed and treatment options are considered.

Silicone thorax due to a ruptured breast implant.

A woman with a history of bilateral mastectomy and silicone implants for fibrocystic disease and a history of atrial septal defect repair presented with pleural nodules on a chest radiograph. A thorascopic biopsy performed for possible mesothelioma demonstrated chronic inflammation and focal pleural fibrosis due to a foreign-body reaction secondary to silicone. This was confirmed using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive radiograph elemental analysis. As the population ages, the increasing frequency of ruptured silicone implants and the need for heart surgery may result in a corresponding increase in the risk for fibrothorax secondary to inadvertent silicone introduction during surgery.