Management of Zone III Missile Injuries Involving the Carotid Artery and Cranial Nerves.

Carotid and cranial nerve injuries from zone III (high cervical/cranial base) missile injuries are rare and difficult to treat. We have treated five patients with such injuries. We present our management scheme, and compare it to the management of the same injuries in other reports. Five consecutive zone III missile injuries presented to our institution. Trauma assessment by the trauma team, followed by detailed neurological assessment and radiographs (angiogram and computed tomography) were obtained on admission. All patients presented with dysphagia and carotid artery injury with good collateral flow, documented by angiogram. Two patients had facial nerve injury, one had trigeminal nerve injury, one patient presented with tongue weakness, and one patient suffered conductive hearing loss. No patient had evidence of stroke clinically or radiographically. Carotid artery injury was managed with bypass (3 of 5) or ligation (2 of 5). Cranial nerve injuries were documented and treated aggressively with surgery if needed. All patients were discharged to home. Patients presenting with zone III missile injuries should receive an expeditious neurological exam and four-vessel angiogram after initial trauma survey and resuscitation. Bypass of the injured portion of carotid artery is a valid treatment in the hemodynamically stable patient. The unstable patient should undergo ligation to stop hemorrhage and protect against immediate risk for stroke, with the option to bypass later. Cranial nerve injuries should be pursued and aggressively treated to minimize morbidity and prevent mortality.

Proposed grading system to predict the extent of resection and outcomes for cranial base meningiomas.

OBJECTIVE: This investigation was performed to construct a grading system for cranial base meningiomas that augments the current system of topographic labeling. This new system classifies cranial base meningiomas based on predicted surgical resection and patient outcomes. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with cranial base meningiomas were surgically treated by the two senior authors between April 1993 and August 1997. Using standard statistical tests, a large number of preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up findings were analyzed for correlation with the extent of resection. These included the presence of previous radiotherapy, Cranial Nerve III, V, and VI palsies, multiple fossa involvement, and vessel encasement. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that each variable tested was independently and inversely correlated with total tumor resection (P < 0.002). We were able to construct a grading system based on these variables; when more variables are present, the grade is higher. With the grading system, lower-grade tumors were correlated with increased probabilities of total resection (r2 = 0.9947) and better patient outcomes, as measured by Karnofsky performance scale scores (r = 0.9291). We also found that, as a group, patients who underwent subtotal resection exhibited worse Karnofsky performance scale scores and had longer hospital stays. CONCLUSION: The current system of classifying cranial base meningiomas provides no information regarding the tumor except location and no information concerning patient prognosis. We present a more useful system to categorize these tumors. Our scheme must be tested at other centers to corroborate our findings. This new grading system should serve to guide surgical treatment, inform patients, and improve communication among surgeons.