ABSTRACT
Background: Substance use among adolescents is common and associated with significant consequences, including depression. Adolescents can experience myriad problems related to early onset substance use and depression, making further understanding of this comorbidity necessary. Method: Participants were a subset from a large-scale performance improvement project and consisted of adolescents aged 12-18 who screened positive for depression during their routine medical or psychiatric appointment and who then completed the substance use assessment Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble Version 2.1 (CRAFFT). Participants with problematic substance use had a CRAFFT score ≥2. Results: A total of 621 participants were included in this study, and 105 (16.9%) reported problematic substance use. Compared with participants without problematic substance use, those with problematic use were more likely to have moderate to severe depression and anxiety, as well as significantly higher irritability, impulsivity, suicidal propensity, and suicidal thoughts scores. Controlling for age at screening, sex, race, and ethnicity, problematic substance use remained a significant predictor of depression severity, impulsivity, suicidal propensity, and suicidal thoughts. Limitations: Participants were from a large, metropolitan area of the Southwest United States who must have screened positive for depression, so results may not generalize. Because all participants were underage, they may have been wary in responding to the substance use assessment accurately. Conclusions: By using a large, diverse sample in a real-world clinical setting, findings strengthen the association between problematic substance use and depression and depression-associated symptoms among adolescents, highlighting the need for early detection and universal depression screening.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This report from VitalSign6 project describes treatment selection, follow-up rates and remission outcomes by initial depression severity using the PCP-FIRST model. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 32,106 patients aged ≥12 years screened with the Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item (PHQ-2) from November 2016 to July 2019 across 37 primary care clinics. PHQ-2 positive-screen patients (PHQ-2 ≥ 3) received 9-item PHQ (PHQ-9) and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scales, clinician assessments, and evaluation for pharmacotherapy management with measurement-based care (MBC). RESULTS: Of PHQ-2 screened patients, 18.7% (5994/32,106) were positive and received a PHQ-9. Of 5994 patients with PHQ-9, 2571 received a clinical diagnosis of depression of whom, 333 had none-mild depression (PHQ-9 < 10) and 2238 had moderate-severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Of the 333 patients with none-mild depression and 2238 patients with moderate-severe depression, 266 and 1929 had at least 18 weeks of data available. Of these, 54.9% (146/266) with none-mild depression and 69.1% (1332/1929) with moderate-severe depression were started on pharmacotherapy. Of the 1478 patients with clinical diagnosis of depression, initiated on pharmacotherapy, 1046 returned for ≥1 follow-up and 616 returned for ≥3 follow-ups over 18 weeks. Of the 1046 patients with ≥1 follow-up visit within 18 weeks, remission rates for patients with mild depression, moderate-severe depression, and overall were 55.6% (66/99), 30% (282/941), and 32.4% (338/1040) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite this being a real-world, usual care sample, remission outcomes exceed real world remission rate expectations of 6% in primary care.
Subject(s)
Patient Health Questionnaire , Primary Health Care , Child , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Major depressive disorder affects one in five adults in the United States. While practice guidelines recommend universal screening for depression in primary care settings, clinical outcomes suffer in the absence of optimal models to manage those who screen positive for depression. The current practice of employing additional mental health professionals perpetuates the assumption that primary care providers (PCP) cannot effectively manage depression, which is not feasible, due to the added costs and shortage of mental health professionals. We have extended our previous work, which demonstrated similar treatment outcomes for depression in primary care and psychiatric settings, using measurement-based care (MBC) by developing a model, called Primary Care First (PCP-First), that empowers PCPs to effectively manage depression in their patients. This model incorporates health information technology tools, through an electronic health records (EHR) integrated web-application and facilitates the following five components: (1) Screening (2) diagnosis (3) treatment selection (4) treatment implementation and (5) treatment revision. We have implemented this model as part of a quality improvement project, called VitalSign6, and will measure its success using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. In this report, we provide the background and rationale of the PCP-First model and the operationalization of VitalSign6 project.
ABSTRACT
QUALITY PROBLEM: Despite its global burden and prevalence, Major Depressive Disorder often goes undetected and untreated, and is particularly pervasive in the primary care setting. INITIAL ASSESSMENT: One in four Texans lack health insurance, and people with behavioral health disorders are disproportionately affected. It is possible to provide high-quality depression treatment in primary care settings with outcomes equal to those provided by specialty care. The Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care offered an opportunity to transform service delivery practices in underserved primary care practices to improve quality, health status, patient experience and coordination. CHOICE OF SOLUTION: A point-of-care, web-based, self-report based software program, VitalSign6, was developed to provide universal depression screening in primary care practices and assist providers in monitoring and treating patients' symptoms using principles of Measurement-Based Care. IMPLEMENTATION: Implementation included a multi-faceted training program designed to build confidence and competence in participating clinics' medical providers and staff as well as ongoing performance improvement delivered by the VitalSign6 team. EVALUATION: Primary care providers (N = 11) were interviewed, using a semi-structured interview guide, with a focus on barriers and challenges to full integration, perceptions of the most/least valuable aspects of the program, and the program's impact on knowledge, attitudes and behaviors about depression screening and treatment. LESSONS LEARNED: More efficient technology is needed to reduce time wasted, as is training to reduce stigma and correct misconceptions about antidepressant medications. Provider buy-in is essential. CONCLUSIONS: Despite barriers, VitalSign6 increased knowledge, changed attitudes and enhanced providers' depression screening and treatment skills over time.
