Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 20(5): 872-4, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24750785

ABSTRACT

After porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) was detected in the United States in 2013, we tested environmental samples from trailers in which pigs had been transported. PEDV was found in 5.2% of trailers not contaminated at arrival, , suggesting that the transport process is a source of transmission if adequate hygiene measures are not implemented.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Transportation , Animals , Environmental Microbiology , Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus , Swine , Swine Diseases/transmission , United States/epidemiology
2.
Vet Microbiol ; 168(2-4): 331-9, 2014 Jan 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24393634

ABSTRACT

Oral fluid samples collected from litters of piglets (n=600) one day prior to weaning were evaluated as a method to surveil for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infections in four sow herds of approximately 12,500 sow each. Serum samples from the litters' dam (n=600) were included for comparison. All four herds were endemically infected with PRRSV and all sows had been vaccinated ≥ 2 times with PRRSV modified-live virus vaccines. After all specimens had been collected, samples were randomized and assayed by PRRSV real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and four PRRSV antibody ELISA assays (IgM, IgA, IgG, and Commercial Kit). All sow serum samples were negative by PRRSV RT-qPCR, but 9 of 600 oral fluid samples tested positive at two laboratories. Open reading frame 5 (ORF5) sequencing of 2 of the 9 positive oral fluid samples identified wild-type viruses as the source of the infection. A comparison of antibody responses in RT-qPCR positive vs. negative oral fluid samples showed significantly higher IgG S/P ratios in RT-qPCR-positive oral fluid samples (mean S/P 3.46 vs. 2.36; p=0.02). Likewise, sow serum samples from RT-qPCR-positive litter oral fluid samples showed significantly higher serum IgG (mean S/P 1.73 vs. 0.98; p<0.001) and Commercial Kit (mean S/P 1.97 vs. 0.98; p<0.001) S/P ratios. Overall, the study showed that pre-weaning litter oral fluid samples could provide an efficient and sensitive approach to surveil for PRRSV in infected, vaccinated, or presumed-negative pig breeding herds.


Subject(s)
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/isolation & purification , Saliva/virology , Animals , Animals, Suckling/virology , Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Antibodies, Viral/blood , DNA, Viral/genetics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Female , Genotype , Immunoglobulin A/analysis , Male , Open Reading Frames , Population Surveillance/methods , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/genetics , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/immunology , Saliva/chemistry , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Sus scrofa/virology , Swine/virology , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...