Patient-initiated second opinions: systematic review of characteristics and impact on diagnosis, treatment, and satisfaction.

The impact of second opinions on diagnosis in radiology and pathology is well documented; however, the value of patient-initiated second opinions for diagnosis and treatment in general medical practice is unknown. We conducted a systematic review of patient-initiated second opinions to assess their impact on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction and to determine characteristics and motivating factors of patients who seek a second opinion. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Academic OneFile databases using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) indexes and keyword searches. Search terms included referral and consultation, patient-initiated, patient preference, patient participation, second opinion, second review, and diagnosis. Multiple reviewers screened abstracts and articles to determine eligibility and extract data. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and rated study quality using Cochrane's GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. We screened 1342 abstracts and reviewed full text of 41 articles, identifying 7 articles that reported clinical agreement data and 10 that discussed patient characteristics, motivation, and satisfaction. We found that a second opinion typically confirms the original diagnosis or treatment regimen but that 90% of patients with poorly defined conditions remain undiagnosed. However, 10% to 62% of second opinions yield a major change in the diagnosis, treatment, or prognosis. A larger fraction of patients receive different advice on treatment than on diagnosis. Factors motivating a second opinion include diagnosis or treatment confirmation, dissatisfaction with a consultation, desire for more information, persistent symptoms, or treatment complications. Patients generally believed that second opinions were valuable. Second opinions can result in diagnostic and treatment differences. The literature on patient-initiated second opinions is limited, and the accuracy of the second opinion through follow-up is generally unknown. Standardized methods and outcome measures are needed to determine the value of second opinions, and the potential of second opinions to reduce diagnostic errors merits more rigorous evaluation.

Relationship between self-reported intensity of headache and magnitude of surface EMG.

The study was designed to examine the relationship between self-reported intensity of headache and surface EMG. 98 patients, diagnosed by their neurologists with "muscle-contraction headaches" (tension-type headaches) were referred to evaluate their suitability for biofeedback therapy. At the time of examination, they were asked to rate their average headache intensity on a 10-point scale. Surface EMG data were collected to assess actual muscle contraction. Analysis indicated that among patients diagnosed with muscle contraction headache, there is a positive significant correlation between self-reported intensity of headache and actual muscle-contraction. The current data lend support to the hypothesis that the tension in the headaches currently described as "tension-type" may in fact refer to actual muscular tension or contraction.

Portosystemic myelopathy: spastic paraparesis after portosystemic shunting.

Portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) is a well-known, common complication of portal hypertension. It is thought to be caused by nitrogenous substances such as ammonia, which are normally cleared from the blood stream by the liver. In cirrhosis and other hepatic disorders with portosystemic shunting (PSS)-- either surgical portosystemic anastomoses (PSA) or spontaneous PSS-- the collateral vessels bypass the liver allowing the accumulation of toxic, ammoniacal substances in the blood and tissues. PSE is characterized by encephalopathy; portosystemic myelopathy (PSM) is characterized by paresis of the extremities, Babinski signs and muscle spasticity in patients with cirrhosis and/or PSS. Usually only the lower extremities are involved. This report presents the first case of this syndrome observed 5 years after a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. The 31 year old man with chronic Hepatitis B developed complete spastic paraparesis within 4 weeks after onset of clinical/neurological symptoms, accompanied by an episode of severe hepatic encephalopathy. The transcortical magnetic stimulation showed normal motoric stimulation times to the abductor digiti minimi muscles but no stimulation to the tibialis muscles was seen. Lumbar stimulation to the tibialis muscles, however, was normal. This indicates loss of motor neurons in the spinal cord, a characteristic finding in patients with portosystemic myelopathy. We performed a search of the literature for all reported cases of cirrhosis and/or PSS that developed PSM. However, the intervals between the construction of a shunt and the diagnosis of portosystemic myelopathy were shorter in total portacaval shunts (median 16 months) than in partial, non-portacaval shunts (median 60 months, p < 0.01). This suggests that not only the shunt itself but also the shunted volume contributes to the development of the syndrome Sixty-one patients with PSM have been reported in the literature since 1944. PSE had developed before PSM in almost all cases. PSM occurred from 1 month to 10 years after the creation of portacaval anastomoses (PCA) or splenorenal shunts (SRS) or in cirrhotic patients without shunts. No one type of liver disease or type of shunt appears to predispose to PSM. The mechanisms of PSE and PSM are thought to be similar and of nitrogenous origin, but their pathogenesis remains unknown. Lathyrism, a toxic syndrome with similar symptoms and signs, is caused by the ingestion of a legume, Lathyrus sativa, which contains beta-N-oxalo-L amino-L-alanine (BOAA). This animal model with or without BOAA appears to offer a reliable way of studying PSM experimentally.