The Benefit of Benzodiazepine Reduction: Improving Sedation in Surgical Intensive Care.

AIMS: Sedation, as it is often required in critical care, is associated with immobilization, prolonged ventilation, and increased morbidity. Most sedation protocols are based on benzodiazepines. The presented study analyzes the benefit of benzodiazepine-free sedation. METHODS: In 2008, 134 patients were treated according to a protocol using benzodiazepine and propofol (Group 1). In 2009, we introduced a new sedation strategy based on sufentanil, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, neuroleptics, and antidepressants, which was applied in 140 consecutive patients (Group 2). Depth of sedation, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of Intensive Care Unit, and hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS: Group 1 had both a longer duration of deep sedation (18.7 ± 2.5 days vs. 12.6 ± 1.85 days, P = 0.031) and a longer duration of controlled ventilation (311, 35 ± 32.69 vs. 143, 96 ± 20.76 h, P < 0.0001) than Group 2. Ventilator days were more frequent in Group 1 (653, 66 ± 98.37 h vs. 478, 89 ± 68.92 h, P = 0.128). CONCLUSIONS: The benzodiazepine-free sedation protocol has been shown to significantly reduce depth of sedation and controlled ventilation. Additional evidence is needed to ascertain reduction of ventilator days which would not only be of benefit for the patient but also for the hospital Management.

TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®): optimizing patient flow and management.

PURPOSE: Caring for severely injured trauma patients is challenging for all medical professionals involved both in the preclinical and in the clinical course of treatment. While the overall quality of care in Germany is high there still are significant regional differences remaining. Reasons are geographical and infrastructural differences as well as variations in personnel and equipment of the hospitals. METHODS: To improve state-wide trauma care the German Trauma Society (DGU) initiated the TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®) (TNW) project. The TNW is based on five major components: (a) Whitebook for the treatment of severely injured patients; (b) evidence-based guidelines for the medical care of severe injury; (c) local auditing of participating hospitals; (d) contract of interhospital cooperation; (d) TraumaRegister DGU(®) documentation. RESULTS: By the end of 2013, 644 German Trauma Centres (TC) had successfully passed the audit. To that date 44 regional TNWs with a mean of 13.5 TCs had been established and certified. The TNWs cover approximately 90% of the country's surface. Of those hospitals, 2.3 were acknowledged as Supraregional TC, 5.4 as Regional TC and 6.7 as Lokal TC. Moreover, cross border TNW in cooperation with hospitals in The Netherlands, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Austria have been established. Preparing for the audit 66% of the hospitals implemented organizational changes (e.g. TraumaRegister DGU(®) documentation and interdisciplinary guidelines), while 60% introduced personnel and 21% structural (e.g. X-ray in the ER) changes. CONCLUSIONS: The TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®) project combines the control of common defined standards of care for all participating hospitals (top down) and the possibility of integrating regional cooperation by forming a regional TNW (bottom up). Based on the joint approach of healthcare professionals, it is possible to structure and influence the care of severely injured patients within a nationwide trauma system.

Implementation of a nationwide trauma network for the care of severely injured patients.

BACKGROUND: Regional differences in the care of severely injured patients remain problematic in industrial countries. METHODS: In 2006, the German Society for Trauma Surgery initiated the foundation of regional networks between trauma centers in a TraumaNetwork (TNW). The TNW consisted of five major elements as follows: (a) a whitebook on the treatment of severely injured patients; (b) evidence-based guidelines (S3); (c) local audits; (d) contracts of interhospital cooperation among all participating hospitals; and (e) TraumaRegister documentation. TNW hospitals are classified according to local audit results as supraregional (STC), regional (RTC), or local (LTC) trauma centers by criteria concerning staff, equipment, admission capacity, and responsibility. RESULTS: Five hundred four German trauma centers (TCs) were certified by the end of December 2012. By then, 37 regional TNWs, with a mean of 13.6 TCs, were established, covering approximately 80% of the country's territory. Of the hospitals, 92 were acknowledged as STCs, 210 as RTCs, and 202 as LTCs.In 2012, 19,124 patients were documented by the certified TCs. Fifty-seven percent of the patients were treated in STCs, 34% in RTCs, and 9% in LTCs. The mean (SD) Injury Severity Score (ISS) was highest in STCs (21 [13]), compared with 18 (12) in RTCs and 16 (10) in LTCs. There were differences in expected mortality (based on Revised Injury Severity Classification) according to the differences in the severity of trauma among the different categories, but in all types, the expected mortality was significantly higher than the observed mortality (differences in STCs, 1.8%; RTCs, 1.4%; LTCs, 2.0%). CONCLUSION: According to our findings, it is possible to successfully structure and standardize the care of severely injured patients in a nationwide trauma system. Better outcomes than expected were observed in all categories of TNW hospitals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III. Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

The two-incision, minimally invasive approach in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To present a novel two-incision minimally invasive (TIMI) method for the treatment of anterior acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Prospective consecutive case series. SETTING: Level I University Trauma Centre. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients (mean age, 67 ± 19 years). INTERVENTION: The first TIMI-incision is performed by a pararectal approach at the level of the proximal third of the arcuate line of the ilium. After transection of the abdominal wall, the iliac vessels are mobilized medially and the neuromuscular bundle laterally. The second approach lies above the medial pubic bone. The soft tissue is held using a retraction system. After fracture reduction and fixation by isolated screws, a conventional reconstruction plate is inserted for fracture neutralization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Perioperative course, postoperative radiological evaluation, functional outcome Harris hip score, and quality of life (EQ 5D). RESULTS: Mean operative time was 109 ± 30 mins. All incisions healed primarily. Postoperative radiological exam revealed an anatomic reduction in 20 fractures and a satisfactory reduction in 6. There were no local soft-tissue complications, and no revisions were needed. Follow-up examinations were performed after a minimum of 12 months in 19 patients (73%). The Harris hip score was 86,6 ± 8. Quality of life was comparable to persons in the same age group. CONCLUSION: The TIMI approach represents a viable alternative to the ilioinguinal approach. Despite the limited incisions, a comparable quality of fracture reduction is achieved. The authors believe this technique would be most useful in those patients with a higher risk for postoperative soft-tissue complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Less invasive polyaxial locking plate fixation in periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures of the femur--a prospective study of 41 patients.

BACKGROUND: A great variety of methods for the stabilisation of periprosthetic fractures around total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described. We present the data of our experience in combining a polyaxial, anatomical locking plate with a standardised less invasive technique in the treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant (femoral nail) femur fractures in this prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 41 patients (33 women; age 79.8±11 years) with 41 fractures (n=17 periprosthetic THA, n=10 periprosthetic TKA, n=3 interprosthetic, n=11 perinail) was treated in a 'mini-open' (MO; direct reduction of the fracture and percutaneous plate fixation in two-part fractures; n=22) or a 'minimally invasive' (MI; indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation; n=19) technique. All patients were followed up for 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The polyaxial locking mechanism allowed for the setting of a mean of 5.3 screws around an intramedullary implant. Supported by the less invasive strategy, mainly long plates (n=36; 88% were longer than 24cm) were applied without relevant soft-tissue complication. Five surgical revisions (12.1%) had to be performed. During the first postoperative stay, one seroma was evacuated and in two cases the plate broke due to failed biological healing 6 months after the MO technique. In one case, a revision prosthesis had to be implanted due to ligamentous instability, and in another case, soft-tissue balancing of the patella was performed. In the MO group, four of the five complications requiring surgical revision were seen. There was no infection. No statistical difference was seen between the MO and the MI groups for operating room (OR) time and perioperative need for transfusion. In patients with a poor state of health (n=8; immobile and Glasgow Coma Outcome Scale=3), no local complications were seen. All fractures in the peri-implant fracture group (n=11) healed uneventfully. CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic fracture fixation can be performed as part of a standardised less invasive strategy, but the MI technique should be the preferred treatment. The NCB(®) system allows for a stable plate fixation around an intramedullary implant. With the less invasive technique, long plates can be applied with low rates of soft-tissue complication and implant failure.

Minimally invasive polyaxial locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment for displaced humeral head fractures overlooks a broad variety of surgical techniques and implant systems. A standard operative procedure has not yet been established. In this article, we report our experience with a second-generation locking plate for the humeral head fracture that is applied in a standardized nine-step minimally invasive surgical technique (MIS). METHODS: In a prospective study from May 2008 until November 2009, a cohort of 79 patients with 80 proximal humerus fractures were operated in a MIS procedure using a polyaxial locking plate. Follow-up examination at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperative included radiologic examinations and a clinical outcome analysis by the Constant Score, the Visual Analog Scale for pain, and the Daily Activity Score. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 65.5 years ± 19 years. According to the Neer classification, there were 18 (22.5%) two-part (Neer III), 48 (60%) three-part (Neer IV), and 14 (17.5%) four-part fractures (Neer IV/V). The operation time averaged 65.6 minutes ± 27 minutes. In 13 patients (16.3%), revision was necessary because of procedure-related complications. After 6 months, the Visual Analog Scale for pain was 2.7 ± 1.6 and the Daily Activity Score showed 19.6 ± 6 points. The average age-related Constant Score after 6 months was 67.5 ± 24 points. CONCLUSIONS: MIS surgery of displaced humeral head fractures can be performed in all types of humeral head fractures leading to low complication rates and good clinical outcome. A standardized stepwise procedure in fracture reduction and fixation is recommended to achieve reliable good results.

Monoaxial versus polyaxial locking systems: a biomechanical analysis of different locking systems for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

OBJECTIVE: The development of locking plate systems has led to polyaxial screws and new plate designs. This study compares monoaxial head locking screws (PHILOS© by Synthes) and a new generation of polyaxial locking screws (NCB-LE© by Zimmer) with respect to biomechanical stability. METHODS: On nine pairs of randomised formalin fixed humerus specimens, standardised osteotomies and osteosyntheses with nine monoaxial (group A) und nine polyaxial (group B) plate/screw systems were performed. A material testing machine by Instron (M-10 14961-DE) was used for cyclic stress tests and crash tests until defined breakup criteria as endpoints were reached. RESULTS: After axial cyclic stress 200 times at 90 N, plastic deformation was 1.02 mm in group A and 1.25 mm in group B. After the next cycle using 180 N the additional deformation averaged 0.23 mm in group A and 0.39 mm in group B. The deformation using 450 N was 0.72 mm in group A compared to 0.92 mm in group B. The final full power test resulted in a deformation average of 0.49 mm in group A and 0.63 mm in group B after 2,000 cycles using 450 N. When reaching the breakup criteria the plastic deformation of the NCB plate was 9.04 mm on average. The PHILOS plate was similarly deformed by 9.00 mm. As a result of the crash test, in group A the screws pulled out of the humeral head four times whereas the shaft broke one time and another time the implant was ripped out. The gap was closed four times. In group B, there were three cases of screw cut-through, four shaft fractures/screw avulsions from the shaft and two cases of gap closure. CONCLUSION: The two systems resist the cyclic duration tests and the increasing force tests in a similar manner. The considerable clinical benefits of the polyaxial system are enhanced by equal biomechanical performance.

Damage control orthopedics in patients with multiple injuries is effective, time saving, and safe.

BACKGROUND: Although early fracture fixation is expedient in patients with multiple injuries, early total care (ETC) may be associated with posttraumatic systemic complications. This study was conducted to prospectively evaluate the concept of damage control by immediate external fracture fixation (damage control orthopedics [DCO]) and consecutive conversion osteosynthesis with regard to time savings, effectiveness, and safety. METHODS: In a prospective controlled trial, a cohort of 1,070 patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 20.7 were admitted to a Level I trauma center over a 3.5-year period. Patients with an ISS > 15, survival of more than 24 hours, and without interhospital transfer were included. In all patients with major fractures requiring immediate stabilization, external fixation was performed (DCO). Conversion was executed at the earliest possible time as a one-stage procedure after stabilization of organ functions. TRISS was calculated for patients requiring DCO (DCO group) and for patients without major fractures (control group). Time spent on particular and all surgical procedures, blood loss, and complications of DCO were compared with data of consecutive conversion osteosyntheses which were considered as hypothetical ETC procedures (h-ETC) in identical patients. RESULTS: Four hundred nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Seventy-five (ISS of 37.3) required DCO for 135 fractures, whereas 334 patients (ISS of 30.4) did not require immediate fracture fixation. Mean surgical time was 62 +/- 30 minutes (SEM, 3.5) for DCO. Because of fracture consolidation with external fixation (n = 3) and injury-related death (n = 15), conversion (h-ETC) was performed in 57 patients for 101 fractures. Duration of external fixation averaged 13.7 days (range, 3-46 days). Fifty-five patients (96.5%) required intensive care treatment and 42 patients (73.7%) required mechanical ventilation at the time of conversion. Mean operation time for conversion was 233 +/- 19 minutes (SEM, 18.7) with a value of p < 0.001. Also, blood loss was significantly (p < 0.001) different for DCO (<50 mL) and h-ETC (472 mL; SEM, 63). Pin-track infections were identified in five patients, two patients with acetabular plate osteosynthesis had deep wound infection, and one patient died related to bacterial sepsis with infections of all wound sites. Overall mortality in DCO patients was significantly lower than predicted by TRISS (20% vs. 39.3%), as it was in the 334 patients without immediate fracture fixation (29.5% vs. 24.3%). CONCLUSION: DCO appears to provide a major reduction of operation time and blood loss in the primary treatment period in severely injured patients compared with h-ETC. In addition, we found that DCO is not associated with an increased rate of procedure-related complications. So far, DCO with early and one-stage conversion seems to be a safe strategy of primary fracture treatment in patients with multiple injuries.

Free abdominal fluid on ultrasound in unstable pelvic ring fracture: is laparotomy always necessary?

BACKGROUND: In unstable pelvic ring fractures free abdominal fluid on ultrasound (US) may be caused by retroperitoneal hematoma that passes into the abdominal cavity or by an additional intraabdominal lesion. In this study a clinical pathway for the therapy of potentially combined lesions was analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients treated in the ED for severe trauma underwent basic sonographical and radiologic diagnostics within 15 minutes. of admission. Data were prospectively documented. According to the treatment protocol unstable pelvic ring fractures with initial free fluid on US received laparotomy. Patients with stable vital conditions had abdominal CT-Scan before surgery. RESULTS: 1472 consecutive severely injured patients (ISS 20, age: 39 years) were included. Eighty subjects had sustained type B (47) or C (33) pelvic ring fracture. Early free abdominal fluid on US was absent in 49 cases. Three patients in this group required celiotomy later on, during ICU treatment. In 31 patients free fluid was present. All of them had laparotomy. Only one patient showed retroperitoneal hematoma alone, while all others had one or more significant lesions (rupture) that required surgical repair. Simultaneously with laparotomy pelvic stabilization was performed by external (19) or internal (6) fixation. In all cases with massive pelvic hemorrhage and free fluid in US bleeding was controlled by internal tamponade and external fixation. CONCLUSION: The finding of intraperitoneal fluid on US in the emergency department strongly correlates with significant intraabdominal lesions requiring surgical intervention. Early laparotomy appears indicated in these cases. Shock control in pelvic bleeding can be sufficiently achieved by internal tamponade and external fixation.

A multidisciplinary quality management system for the early treatment of severely injured patients: implementation and results in two trauma centers.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of a multidisciplinary quality management system (MQMS) on the early treatment of severely injured patients was tested. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective clinical study in two level 1 trauma centers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: MQMS comprised a protocol for documentation, 20 assessment criteria, and the judgement of data by a quality circle. After implementation in Munich (1st period, n=90; 2nd period, n=77) the validation took place in Essen (1st period, n=175; 2nd period, n=150). RESULTS: Improvements in diagnostics were shown by significant time savings in radiological diagnostics and before computed tomography in severe traumatic brain injury. In patients with hemorrhagic shock there was a reduction in time before transfusion (49 to 14 min in Munich; 31 to 22 min in Essen) and before emergency operation (74 to 43 min in Munich; 69 to 45 min in Essen). The time before craniotomy was reduced from 97 to 67 min in Munich. The incidence of delayed diagnosis of life-threatening lesions was diminished from 6% to 3% in Munich (not found in Essen). The TRISS technique showed a reduction in mortality in both hospitals in the second period (Munich: 15.4% TRISS vs. 9.1% observed mortality; Essen: 17.8% vs. 11.3%). CONCLUSIONS: MQMS improved early clinical treatment in severe injury with respect to therapeutic effectiveness and outcome. The effectiveness of the MQMS was shown at two different hospitals

Prehospital intubation in severe thoracic trauma without respiratory insufficiency: a matched-pair analysis based on the Trauma Registry of the German Trauma Society.

OBJECTIVE: On the basis of the data of a multicenter study, the impact of prehospital intubation and ventilation in the therapy of severe thoracic trauma without manifest respiratory insufficiency was analyzed. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively in the Trauma Registry of the German Trauma Society. In a matched-pair analysis, patients with severe thoracic trauma (Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 4) with and without prehospital intubation were compared. Patients were paired with respect to age, injury severity, and prognosis (according to the TRISS method). RESULTS: From a total of 3,814 patients, two groups (with/without prehospital intubation) of 44 matched patients each with comparable average age (36 vs. 36 years), Injury Severity Score (29 vs. 29), and TRISS (95.2 vs. 95.3) were identified. No patient was unconscious at the scene (all Glasgow Coma Scale scores > or = 8) or presented with severe respiratory insufficiency (all > or = 10 breaths/min). Time between injury and hospital admission was significantly longer (73 minutes; p < 0.05) in the group with prehospital intubation compared with the nonintubated group (47 minutes). Furthermore, fluid requirements in the prehospital period were significantly higher in the intubated patients (3,000 mL vs. 1,000 mL). In the prehospital intubation group, the number of patients with mass transfusion (9 vs. 4) as well as with emergency operations (10 vs. 4) were not significantly different from the nonintubated group. The prehospital intubation group showed a similar incidence of lung failure (17 vs. 14), kidney failure (6 vs. 2), and circulation failure (13 vs. 5). Except for two of the primarily nonintubated patients, all were intubated during their stay in the emergency room or on the intensive care unit. Days of ventilation (median, 7 days) as well as the length of stay on the ICU (median, 11 days) were comparable in both groups. Mortality in the prehospital intubation group was not significantly different between groups (six vs. two deceased). CONCLUSION: Prognosis with respect to organ failure, treatment time, and mortality is not adversely affected in the German trauma system, if patients with severe thoracic trauma without manifest respiratory insufficiency and without other indications for intubation are not treated with prehospital intubation.