ABSTRACT
The awarding of Magnet Status by the Magnet Nursing Services Recognition Program of the American Nursing Credentialing Center is acknowledged as the achievement of Excellence in Nursing. In this article, The Cleveland Clinic shares insights from its experience in becoming the 72nd Magnet hospital. Questions to ponder when conducting a readiness assessment before embarking on the Magnet journey, techniques to engage the staff in the application process, and writing and organizing tips are shared.
Subject(s)
American Nurses' Association , Credentialing/organization & administration , Nurse Administrators/standards , Nursing Service, Hospital/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Awards and Prizes , Benchmarking , Decision Making, Organizational , Documentation , Humans , Models, Nursing , Motivation , Nurse's Role , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Ohio , Orthopedic Nursing/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Professional Staff Committees/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive ability of a simple six-item triage risk screening tool (TRST) to identify elder emergency department (ED) patients at risk for ED revisits, hospitalization, or nursing home (NH) placement within 30 and 120 days following ED discharge. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 650 community-dwelling elders (age 65 years or older) presenting to two urban academic EDs. Subjects were prospectively evaluated with a simple six-item ED nursing TRST. Participants were interviewed 30 and 120 days post-ED index visit and the utilization of EDs, hospitals, or NHs was recorded. Main outcome measurement was the ability of the TRST to predict the composite endpoint of subsequent ED use, hospital admission, or NH admission at 30 and 120 days. Individual outcomes of ED use, hospitalization, and NH admissions were also examined. RESULTS: Increasing cumulative TRST scores were associated with significant trends for ED use, hospital admission, and composite outcome at both 30 and 120 days (p < 0.0001 for all, except 30-day ED use, p = 0.002). A simple, unweighted five-item TRST ("lives alone" item removed after logistic regression modeling) with a cut-off score of 2 was the most parsimonious model for predicting composite outcome (AUC = 0.64) and hospitalization at 30 days (AUC = 0.72). Patients defined as high-risk by the TRST (score > or = 2) were significantly more likely to require subsequent ED use (RR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.2 to 2.3), hospital admission (RR = 3.3; 95% CI = 2.2 to 5.1), or the composite outcome (RR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.9) at both 30 days and 120 days than the low-risk cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Older ED patients with two or more risk factors on a simple triage screening tool were found to be at significantly increased risk for subsequent ED use, hospitalization, and nursing home admission.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Triage/methods , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cohort Studies , Humans , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge , Prospective Studies , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Elderly emergency department patients have complex medical needs and limited social support. A transitional model of care adapted from hospitals was tested for its effectiveness in the ED in reducing subsequent service use. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at 2 urban, academically affiliated hospitals. Participants were 650 community-residing individuals 65 years or older who were discharged home after an ED visit. Main outcomes were service use rates, defined as repeat ED visits, hospitalizations, or nursing home admissions, and health care costs at 30 and 120 days. Intervention consisted of comprehensive geriatric assessment in the ED by an advanced practice nurse and subsequent referral to a community or social agency, primary care provider, and/or geriatric clinic for unmet health, social, and medical needs. Control group participants received usual and customary ED care. RESULTS: The intervention had no effect on overall service use rates at 30 or 120 days. However, the intervention was effective in lowering nursing home admissions at 30 days (0.7% versus 3%; odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05 to 0.99) and in increasing patient satisfaction with ED discharge care (3.41 versus 3.03; mean difference 0.37; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.62). The intervention was more effective for high-risk than low-risk elders. CONCLUSION: An ED-based transitional model of care reduced subsequent nursing home admissions but did not decrease overall service use for older ED patients. Further studies are needed to determine the best models of care for this setting and for at-risk patients.