A combined molecular approach utilizing microbial DNA and microRNAs in a qPCR multiplex for the classification of five forensically relevant body fluids.

Body fluid identification is an essential step in the forensic biology workflow that can assist DNA analysts in determining where to collect DNA evidence. Current presumptive tests lack the specificity that molecular techniques can achieve; therefore, molecular methods, including microRNA (miRNA) and microbial signature characterization, have been extensively researched in the forensic community. Limitations of each method suggest combining molecular markers to increase the discrimination efficiency of multiple body fluids from a single assay. While microbial signatures have been successful in identifying fluids with high bacterial abundances, microRNAs have shown promise in fluids with low microbial abundance (blood and semen). This project synergized the benefits of microRNAs and microbial DNA to identify multiple body fluids using DNA extracts. A reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR duplex targeting miR-891a and let-7g was validated, and miR-891a differential expression was significantly different between blood and semen. The miRNA duplex was incorporated into a previously reported qPCR multiplex targeting 16S rRNA genes of Lactobacillus crispatus, Bacteroides uniformis, and Streptococcus salivarius to presumptively identify vaginal/menstrual secretions, feces, and saliva, respectively. The combined classification regression tree model resulted in the presumptive classification of five body fluids with 94.6% overall accuracy, now including blood and semen identification. These results provide proof of concept that microRNAs and microbial DNA can classify multiple body fluids simultaneously at the quantification step of the current forensic DNA workflow.

Organic Extraction of Nucleic Acids Using Ethanol Precipitation or Microcon® Centrifugal Filter Purification Methods.

The use of organic solvents to separate nucleic acids from other cell components is a common practice among many scientific fields, including molecular biology and biochemistry. The advantage of performing organic extractions in forensic DNA analysis is the ability to purify DNA from heavily degraded or inhibitory sample types, such as skeletal remains. These sample types require special care to ensure that the DNA is contaminant-free since they often contain PCR inhibitors that negatively impact downstream DNA analysis, resulting in unobtainable or uninterpretable short tandem repeat (STR) profiles. Purification of DNA after an organic isolation procedure is essential for improving the likelihood of obtaining valid STR profile from a challenging evidence sample. This chapter describes the methodology for extracting and purifying DNA from various types of challenging samples that are often encountered in forensic casework.

microRNA Detection in Blood, Urine, Semen, and Saliva Stains After Compromising Treatments.

Evaluation of microRNA (miRNA) expression as a potential method for forensic body fluid identification has been the subject of investigation over the past several years. Because of their size and encapsulation within proteins and lipids, miRNAs are inherently less susceptible to degradation than other RNAs. In this work, blood, urine, semen, and saliva were exposed to environmental and chemical conditions mimicking sample compromise at the crime scene. For many treated samples, including 100% of blood samples, miRNAs remained detectable, comparable to the untreated control. Sample degradation varied by body fluid and treatment, with blood remarkably resistant, while semen and saliva are more susceptible to environmental insult. Body fluid identification using relative miRNA expression of blood and semen of the exposed samples was 100% and 94%, respectively. Given the overall robust results herein, the case is strengthened for the use of miRNAs as a molecular method for body fluid identification.

Detection of microRNAs in DNA Extractions for Forensic Biological Source Identification.

Molecular-based approaches for biological source identification are of great interest in the forensic community because of a lack of sensitivity and specificity in current methods. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been considered due to their robust nature and tissue specificity; however, analysis requires a separate RNA extraction, requiring an additional step in the forensic analysis workflow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate miRNA detection in blood, semen, and saliva using DNA extraction methods commonly utilized for forensic casework. RT-qPCR analysis revealed that the tested miRNAs were consistently detectable across most tested DNA extraction methods, but detection was significantly reduced compared to RNA extracts in some biological fluids. DNase treatment was not necessary to achieve miRNA-specific results. A previously developed miRNA panel for forensic body fluid identification was evaluated using DNA extracts, and largely demonstrated concordance with results from samples deriving from RNA extracts of semen, blood, and saliva.