ABSTRACT
Social isolation is a common phenomenon among the elderly. Retirement, widowhood, and increased prevalence of chronic diseases in this age group lead to a decline in social relationships, which in turn has adverse consequences on health and well-being. The coronavirus COVID-19 crisis worsened this situation, raising interest for mobile telepresence robots (MTR) that would help create, maintain, and strengthen social relationships. MTR are tools equipped with a camera, monitor, microphone, and speaker, with a body on wheels that allows for remote-controlled and sometimes autonomous movement aiming to provide easy access to assistance and networking services. We conducted a narrative review of literature describing experimental studies of MTR involving elderly people over the last 20 years, including during the COVID-19 period. The aim of this review was to examine whether MTR use was beneficial for reducing loneliness and social isolation among older adults at home and in health and care institutions and to examine the current benefits and barriers to their use and implementation. We screened 1754 references and included 24 research papers focusing on the usability, acceptability, and effectiveness of MTR. News reports on MTR use during the COVID-19 period were also examined. A qualitative, multidimensional analysis methodology inspired by a health technology assessment model was used to identify facilitating and limiting factors and investigate if and how MTR could reduce social isolation in elderly people. Reviewed studies provide encouraging evidence that MTR have potential in this regard, as experiments report positive feedback on MTR design and core functionalities. However, our analysis also points to specific technical, ergonomic, and ethical challenges that remain to be solved, highlighting the need for further multidimensional research on the design and impact of MTR interventions for older adults and building on new insights gained during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Robotics , Aged , Humans , Loneliness , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Social IsolationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: There are several barriers to older adults using internet and information and communication technology (ICT). It has been suggested that appropriate training is necessary to support the learning process and is an important issue with regards to digital inclusivity for older adults. This study explored the impact of a tablet-PC training program for older adults, provided in a group setting. RESULTS: Thirteen community-dwelling older adults attended the program (ten one and half hour training sessions, taking place once every 2 weeks) and completed pre- and post- assessments. After the intervention, participants showed significantly higher levels of ICT acceptance (87.6 vs. 113.5, p=0.002) and proficiency (109.5 vs. 132.7, p=0.003) than before the intervention. However, they did not showed improvement in feelings of loneliness, symptoms of depression and global cognitive function. Qualitative analyses indicated that the intervention enabled older adults to become more up to date with the information society and promoted tablet-PC acceptance. Although it helped older adults to feel less isolated, it did not enable them to form genuine friendships. CONCLUSION: The intervention was effective in improving older adults' digital literacy and promoting ICT acceptance, allowing the digital divide to be narrowed.
Subject(s)
Communication Aids for Disabled , Computers, Handheld , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognition , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Independent Living , Learning , Loneliness , Male , Psychomotor PerformanceABSTRACT
This study investigated cognitive function in relation to the use of a computer and a touchscreen device among older adults attending a memory clinic. The entire sample (n = 323) was categorized into four profiles, according to the frequency of digital device use (either daily or non-daily usage). Results showed that on a daily basis, 26% of the sample used both a computer and a touchscreen device, 26.9% used only a computer, 7.1% used only a touchscreen device, and 39.9% used neither type of digital device. There were significant group differences on age, education, and clinical diagnosis (p < .001). Non-daily users of digital devices had significantly lower performance, compared with daily users of both types of digital device, on measures of global cognitive function, processing speed, short-term memory, and several components of executive function (p < .001). Falling behind with regard to the use of digital devices might reflect underlying poor cognitive capacities.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore whether a computerized cognitive stimulation program (CCS) induced differential effects in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) according to the severity of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), which are associated with cognitive impairment and increased risk of progression to Alzheimer's disease because of the damage they cause to cortical and subcortical networks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine MCI patients with no or little WMH (MCI-non-WMH) and 22 MCI patients with moderate or severe WMH (MCI-WMH) attended a 24-session CCS program (two sessions per week for a duration of 3 months) focused on executive functions, attention, and processing speed. Cognitive and psychosocial assessments were performed at baseline, postintervention, and 3 months after the intervention. RESULTS: Both groups improved on several cognitive measures after the intervention. However, the MCI-non-WMH group improved on a higher number of cognitive measures than the MCI-WMH group. At postintervention assessment, CCS had a more beneficial effect on the MCI-non-WMH group than on the MCI-WMH group with regard to improving categorical fluency (4.6±6.8 vs 0.4±6.4; effect size=0.37; p=0.002). During the 3-month follow-up assessment, significantly higher score improvements were observed in the MCI-non-WMH group for the paired-associate learning test (6.4±3 vs 4.7±3.5 points; effect size=0.43; p=0.005) as well as categorical fluency (3.8±7.8 vs -0.7±6 points; effect size=0.55; p=0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that WMH severity was related to cognitive improvement induced by a CCS program and highlight the importance of considering WMH in interventional studies on subjects with MCI.
