Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 11(4): 357-65, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16011648

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The decision to prescribe one drug instead of another within the same therapeutic class may be influenced by a variety of drug-related, direct, or indirect factors; but little is known about which considerations are most important in such choices. The low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) represent a class of drugs that are commonly used and for which therapeutic equivalence has been debated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify and compare factors perceived by doctors and clinical pharmacists to be influential in prescribing decisions among LMWHs. METHODS: Doctors and clinical pharmacists were interviewed to elicit information and to rank factors that influence the prescribing and use of LMWHs in community hospitals in the United States. For each factor, the mean and median of the rating were determined along with the frequency distribution across ratings. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to examine differences between doctors and clinical pharmacists. RESULTS: Both groups considered efficacy, formulary status, and policies restricting drug use to be highly influential in the decision to use one LMWH instead of another. Compared to clinical pharmacists, doctors rated personal experience as more influential, whereas they rated drug cost and prescribing guidelines lower. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that doctors and clinical pharmacists differentiate between LMWHs based on differences between products and because of hospital administrative programs (such as drug formularies). This information may be of value in designing programs to alter medication use.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Choice Behavior , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/classification , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Pharmacists , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
2.
Ann Pharmacother ; 38(10): 1570-5, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15304628

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulants are widely used and represent a class of drugs that are problem-prone and have a high potential for adverse patient outcomes. As such, these drugs may be amenable to the use of prescribing guidelines. However, relatively little has been published on the effect of such guidelines on clinical outcomes or costs of care. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether guidelines improve the appropriateness of prescribing, clinical outcomes, and costs associated with use of anticoagulants in a sample of community hospitals in the US. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of data voluntarily collected by 15 hospitals before (July-September 2001) and after (March-May 2002) implementation of anticoagulant prescribing guidelines. Statistical analyses of both patient- and hospital-level variables were conducted. RESULTS: Implementation of the guidelines resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of anticoagulants that were prescribed appropriately (59.8% vs 86.9%; p < 0.001). The guidelines also resulted in a shift in the type of anticoagulants prescribed (decreased use of unfractionated heparin and increased use of low-molecular-weight heparins). There was suggestive evidence, although not statistically significant, that the guidelines resulted in fewer anticoagulant-associated adverse events (total bleeding RR 0.71) and lower costs (savings of $56.15 per patient per day). CONCLUSIONS: While limitations existed with the study design, sufficient benefits were identified to warrant hospitals to consider use of these or similar guidelines on a routine basis. Clearly, additional study in this area would be useful.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/economics , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Hospitalization/economics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Hospital Administration , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Community/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 38(4): 649-60, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14982975

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of guidelines for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in the emergency department/observation unit (ED-OU) setting for hospitals that are part of a group purchasing organization (GPO). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966-March 2003) using the following search terms: cardiotonic agents; diuretic; dobutamine; heart failure, congestive; milrinone; natriuretic peptide, brain; nesiritide; nitroglycerin; vasodilator agents, was conducted. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant articles in the English language were identified. All randomized studies and meta-analyses for each category of drugs were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: A group consensus method was used to develop guidelines. An expert panel reviewed and revised the guidelines. The final guidelines were approved June 1, 2003, and are described here. They are organized based upon a patient's symptomatology at the time the diagnosis of ADHF is made. Patients with evidence of volume overload require intravenous diuretics and/or intravenous vasodilators to alleviate the symptoms of ADHF. Patients with signs and symptoms of low cardiac output require inotropic support to manage their ADHF. A timeline for diagnosis, treatment, reassessment, and disposition is provided and encourages an early, aggressive approach to treating patients with ADHF. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization for ADHF is common and costly. Consensus guidelines for the treatment of ADHF did not previously exist, resulting in inconsistent and inefficient treatment. Consequently, hospitals struggling with the treatment of ADHF may find these guidelines and the process by which they were developed useful.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Acute Disease , Cardiac Output, Low/drug therapy , Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Diuretics/therapeutic use , Emergency Service, Hospital , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Humans , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use
4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 38(4): 557-62, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14966259

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Strategies to control the quality and cost of medication use are largely dependent on the ability to alter selection of medications. Previous models of prescribing behavior have focused on physicians. In the hospital setting, clinical pharmacists and formulary committee members are also key players in drug therapy decision-making. Differences between physicians, formulary committee members, and clinical pharmacists have not been compared. Knowledge of these differences could have importance in predicting the effectiveness of strategies designed to influence drug use in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the opinions of physicians, clinical pharmacists, and formulary committee members with respect to key factors that influence medication prescribing in community hospitals. METHODS: Physicians, clinical pharmacists, and formulary committee members were solicited to participate. A trained interviewer administered a standardized questionnaire designed to elicit opinions of participants regarding the importance of factors thought to influence drug prescribing. Responses were described using descriptive statistics, and differences between the groups were determined by post hoc analysis. RESULTS: A total of 150 individuals participated in the study. Safety, effectiveness, formulary status, and restrictions on prescribing were considered highly influential by all participants. Physicians rated the availability of drug samples and personal experience higher (more influential on prescribing) than clinical pharmacists and formulary committee members. Clinical pharmacists and formulary committee members rated the influence of recommendations by clinical pharmacists, prescribing guidelines, and cost or cost comparisons higher than physicians. Factors that were drug-related or that involved policy-related programs tended to be more influential than indirect factors. CONCLUSIONS: Those who seek to implement programs to alter medication use should recognize and employ factors that are most influential in the decision-making process. Further, it may be important to consider differences that exist between key participants in the medication use process.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Drug Prescriptions , Hospitals, Community/economics , Drug Prescriptions/economics , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Peer Review , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/economics , Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Med Syst ; 27(6): 531-41, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14626478

ABSTRACT

Results of a survey of medication safety technology in community hospitals are presented. A written questionnaire was mailed to pharmacy directors at 88 hospitals located in 21 states. Items in the questionnaire addressed current and planned use of technology intended to improve medication safety. Fifty-six usable responses were received for a response rate of 63.6%. Medication safety was considered one of the most important issues facing pharmacy departments. Barriers identified by respondents to the implementation of medication safety initiatives included lack of time and personnel. Most hospitals had implemented one or more different types of medication safety technology. Computer-generated or electronic medication administration records, pharmacy computer systems interfaced with laboratory values, and unit-based medication dispensing cabinets were the most common medication safety technologies used. Pharmacy managers perceived these technologies to have resulted in a reduction in the rate of medication errors in respondent hospitals.


Subject(s)
Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Systems, Hospital/organization & administration , Safety Management/methods , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/organization & administration
6.
Ann Pharmacother ; 37(7-8): 1072-81, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12841821

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of guidelines for initial use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and other anticoagulants in acute-care hospitals that are part of a national group purchasing organization (GPO). DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search (1970-December 2001) was conducted to identify evidence on the efficacy of various anticoagulants for initial therapy in deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and in treatment of acute coronary syndrome. A group consensus method was then used to develop guidelines. Guidelines were reviewed and revised by an internal expert panel as well as an external expert panel. Final guidelines were disseminated to GPO members and assistance was provided with implementation at the local level. RESULTS: The final set of guidelines is described. The guidelines are organized based on recommended therapeutic options for each indication. For each option, consensus opinion is provided on the level of evidence that exists in the literature, comparisons of cost and convenience, and additional dosing information. The guidelines were disseminated along with supporting material to interested GPO member hospitals, and teleconferences were held to facilitate implementation at the local level. The guidelines were initially implemented at 18 hospitals across the country. CONCLUSIONS: The process by which these guidelines were developed, plus the final set of guidelines, may be useful to hospitals and healthcare systems contemplating or engaged in a similar effort with this class of drugs.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Group Purchasing , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage , Humans , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy
7.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 59(6): 534-8, 2002 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11908246

ABSTRACT

Hospital policies regarding the use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) were studied. A questionnaire addressing the formulary status of LMWH products, the use of prescribing guidelines, programs for therapeutic interchange, and policies to promote alternatives to LMWHs when appropriate was prepared. The questionnaire was mailed in January 2001 to pharmacy directors at 70 hospitals located in 19 states. All the hospitals were members of a national group purchasing organization. Forty-nine usable responses were received, for a response rate of 70%. Enoxaparin and dalteparin were the LMWH products most likely to be on the respondents' formularies (98% and 29% of hospitals, respectively). About 29% of the hospitals reported having guidelines on the use of LMWHs. Among hospitals that did not, most indicated that they were considering or would like to implement such guidelines. The most commonly cited barrier to the development and implementation of guidelines was lack of pharmacy personnel. Ten percent of the respondents reported having therapeutic-interchange programs for LMWHs. Cited barriers to therapeutic interchange programs included lack of therapeutic equivalence among products and lack of comparable labeled indications. Policies to promote alternatives to LMWHs were reported by 18% of the respondents. A multihospital survey showed that many hospitals wanted but relatively few had prescribing guidelines for LMWHs.


Subject(s)
Drug Utilization Review , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Formularies, Hospital as Topic , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Organizational Policy , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Dalteparin/therapeutic use , Enoxaparin/therapeutic use , Group Purchasing , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Therapeutic Equivalency , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...