Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Sex Marital Ther ; 39(2): 132-43, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252638

ABSTRACT

The decreased sexual desire screener is a brief diagnostic instrument for generalized acquired hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women. During the screening visit of 2 clinical trials, the authors assessed sensitivity of the decreased sexual desire screener in premenopausal women presenting with decreased sexual desire. The authors compared diagnoses of generalized acquired hypoactive sexual desire disorder made by clinicians who were not trained or specialized in the diagnosis of female sexual dysfunction using the decreased sexual desire screener with diagnoses made by expert clinicians after an extensive diagnostic interview. The sensitivity of the decreased sexual desire screener was 0.946 in a North American trial and 0.960 in a European trial.


Subject(s)
Libido , Premenopause , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/diagnosis , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Europe , Female , Health Status , Humans , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , North America , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/epidemiology , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/epidemiology
2.
J Sex Med ; 7(12): 3918-28, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20819140

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female (SIDI-F) is a 13-item scale developed as a clinician-administered assessment tool to measure hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) severity in women. AIM: To estimate the reliability and validity of the SIDI-F as a measure of HSDD severity. METHODS: Women, aged 18-65 years, with primary HSDD, Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (FSAD), or no Female Sexual Dysfunction (no FSD) participated in two nontreatment studies (in North America and Europe). On days 0 and 28, subjects were assessed using the SIDI-F, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire-Female (CSFQ-F), Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test (MAT) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discriminant validity, convergent validity, divergent validity, test-retest validity, and internal consistency of the SIDI-F. RESULTS: The North American study enrolled women with HSDD (N = 113), FSAD (N = 49) and no FSD (N = 61); the European study enrolled women with HSDD (N = 130) and no FSD (N = 124). In both studies, mean SIDI-F total score for women with HSDD was lower than for those with no FSD (P < 0.001, for all) demonstrating discriminant validity. Further, mean SIDI-F total score for women with HSDD was lower than for those with FSAD in the North American study (P < 0.001). Convergent validity with the FSFI and CSFQ-F and divergent validity with MAT were demonstrated. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were high. CONCLUSIONS: The SIDI-F is a valid and reliable measure of HSDD severity in women.


Subject(s)
Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , North America/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
3.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 19(12): 2191-5, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20858040

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most appropriate cutoff value for the Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female (SIDI-F) score to discriminate between women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) and those with no female sexual dysfunction (FSD). The SIDI-F is a clinician-rated instrument consisting of 13 items designed to assess HSDD severity in women. The total score ranges from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicating better sexual function. METHODS: Data from patients enrolled in a North American nontreatment study and a European nontreatment study were analyzed. Both studies were 4-week, prospective, multicenter trials designed to assess the reliability and validity of the SIDI-F. Only patients with HSDD or no FSD were included in this analysis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the ability of the SIDI-F to differentiate between patients with HSDD and those with no FSD at baseline. RESULTS: A total of 428 women were included in this analysis: 174 from North America (HSDD 113, no FSD 61) and 254 from Europe (HSDD 130, no FSD 124). In the North American study, a SIDI-F cutoff score of 33 minimized the difference between sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (93.4%). In the European study, SIDI-F cutoff scores of both 33 and 34 minimized the difference between sensitivity (95.2%) and specificity (94.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately screened women, a SIDI-F score of ≤33 indicates the presence of HSDD.


Subject(s)
Libido , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/diagnosis , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Europe , Female , Humans , Libido/physiology , Personality Inventory , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
4.
J Sex Med ; 6(3): 730-8, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19170868

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: An accurate diagnosis of Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD) currently relies on a time-consuming interview with an expert clinician. Limited access to such expertise means that many women with HSDD remain undiagnosed. The Decreased Sexual Desire Screener (DSDS) was developed to provide clinicians who are neither trained nor specialized in Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD) with a brief diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of generalized acquired HSDD in women. METHODS: A prospective non-treatment multicenter study enrolled 263 women at 27 centers in North America in order to test the validity of the DSDS for diagnosing generalized acquired HSDD in women. Subjects completed the DSDS at the screening visit and their answers were reviewed with a clinician who was not an expert in FSD ("non-expert clinician"). Separately and while being unaware of the non-expert clinician's diagnosis, an expert clinician conducted a standard diagnostic interview. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic outcomes (generalized acquired HSDD or not) were compared. Primary endpoints included the sensitivity and specificity of the DSDS relative to the standard diagnostic interview. Subject and non-expert clinician debriefing were obtained via a written, structured interview. This ensured that a large sample could be tested under uniform conditions across multiple sites. RESULTS: Diagnostic assessment by DSDS and standard diagnostic interview were in agreement in 85.2% (224/263) of cases, with the sensitivity and specificity of the DSDS 83.6% and 87.8%, respectively. Debriefing showed that the five DSDS questions were well understood by 85.4% (76/89) of subjects included in the debriefing exercise, while non-expert clinicians considered the DSDS questions adequate to diagnose HSDD in 92.9% (235/253) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The DSDS is a sensitive and specific brief diagnostic instrument for generalized acquired HSDD in women that is quick and easy to use.


Subject(s)
Libido , Mass Screening , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/diagnosis , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Demography , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Sexual Behavior/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...