Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Data ; 10(1): 272, 2023 05 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37169799

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all domains of human life, including the economic and social fabric of societies. One of the central strategies for managing public health throughout the pandemic has been through persuasive messaging and collective behaviour change. To help scholars better understand the social and moral psychology behind public health behaviour, we present a dataset comprising of 51,404 individuals from 69 countries. This dataset was collected for the International Collaboration on Social & Moral Psychology of COVID-19 project (ICSMP COVID-19). This social science survey invited participants around the world to complete a series of moral and psychological measures and public health attitudes about COVID-19 during an early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (between April and June 2020). The survey included seven broad categories of questions: COVID-19 beliefs and compliance behaviours; identity and social attitudes; ideology; health and well-being; moral beliefs and motivation; personality traits; and demographic variables. We report both raw and cleaned data, along with all survey materials, data visualisations, and psychometric evaluations of key variables.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Attitude , COVID-19/psychology , Morals , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Social Change , Socioeconomic Factors
3.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 517, 2022 01 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35082277

ABSTRACT

Changing collective behaviour and supporting non-pharmaceutical interventions is an important component in mitigating virus transmission during a pandemic. In a large international collaboration (Study 1, N = 49,968 across 67 countries), we investigated self-reported factors associated with public health behaviours (e.g., spatial distancing and stricter hygiene) and endorsed public policy interventions (e.g., closing bars and restaurants) during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic (April-May 2020). Respondents who reported identifying more strongly with their nation consistently reported greater engagement in public health behaviours and support for public health policies. Results were similar for representative and non-representative national samples. Study 2 (N = 42 countries) conceptually replicated the central finding using aggregate indices of national identity (obtained using the World Values Survey) and a measure of actual behaviour change during the pandemic (obtained from Google mobility reports). Higher levels of national identification prior to the pandemic predicted lower mobility during the early stage of the pandemic (r = -0.40). We discuss the potential implications of links between national identity, leadership, and public health for managing COVID-19 and future pandemics.


Subject(s)
Pandemics/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Conformity , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Health Behavior , Humans , Leadership , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Self Report , Social Identification
4.
Sci Rep ; 7: 46899, 2017 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28880011

ABSTRACT

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/srep46709.

5.
Sci Rep ; 7: 46709, 2017 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28447613

ABSTRACT

Sustained cooperative social interactions are key to successful outcomes in many real-world contexts (e.g., climate change and energy conservation). We explore the self-regulatory roles of anger and guilt, as well as prosocial or selfish social preferences in a repeated social dilemma game framed around shared electricity use at home. We explore the proposal that for sustained cooperation, guilty repair needs to override angry retaliation. We show that anger is damaging to cooperation as it leads to retaliation and an increase of defection, while, through guilt, cooperation is repaired resulting in higher levels of cooperation. We demonstrate a disconnect between the experience of anger and subsequent retaliation which is a function of participants' social preferences. While there is no difference in reports of anger between prosocial and selfish individuals after finding out that others use more energy from the communal resource, prosocials are less likely to act on their anger and retaliate. Selfish individuals are motivated by anger to retaliate but not motivated by guilt to repair and contribute disproportionately to the breakdown of cooperation over repeated interactions. We suggest that guilt is a key emotion to appeal to when encouraging cooperation.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Emotions/physiology , Guilt , Social Behavior , Adolescent , Adult , Anger , Female , Game Theory , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...