Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 114
Filter
1.
Ann Oncol ; 29(4): 872-880, 2018 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29360925

ABSTRACT

Background: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) metastatic breast cancer is often intractable due to endocrine therapy resistance. Although ESR1 promoter switching events have been associated with endocrine-therapy resistance, recurrent ESR1 fusion proteins have yet to be identified in advanced breast cancer. Patients and methods: To identify genomic structural rearrangements (REs) including gene fusions in acquired resistance, we undertook a multimodal sequencing effort in three breast cancer patient cohorts: (i) mate-pair and/or RNAseq in 6 patient-matched primary-metastatic tumors and 51 metastases, (ii) high coverage (>500×) comprehensive genomic profiling of 287-395 cancer-related genes across 9542 solid tumors (5216 from metastatic disease), and (iii) ultra-high coverage (>5000×) genomic profiling of 62 cancer-related genes in 254 ctDNA samples. In addition to traditional gene fusion detection methods (i.e. discordant reads, split reads), ESR1 REs were detected from targeted sequencing data by applying a novel algorithm (copyshift) that identifies major copy number shifts at rearrangement hotspots. Results: We identify 88 ESR1 REs across 83 unique patients with direct confirmation of 9 ESR1 fusion proteins (including 2 via immunoblot). ESR1 REs are highly enriched in ER-positive, metastatic disease and co-occur with known ESR1 missense alterations, suggestive of polyclonal resistance. Importantly, all fusions result from a breakpoint in or near ESR1 intron 6 and therefore lack an intact ligand binding domain (LBD). In vitro characterization of three fusions reveals ligand-independence and hyperactivity dependent upon the 3' partner gene. Our lower-bound estimate of ESR1 fusions is at least 1% of metastatic solid breast cancers, the prevalence in ctDNA is at least 10× enriched. We postulate this enrichment may represent secondary resistance to more aggressive endocrine therapies applied to patients with ESR1 LBD missense alterations. Conclusions: Collectively, these data indicate that N-terminal ESR1 fusions involving exons 6-7 are a recurrent driver of endocrine therapy resistance and are impervious to ER-targeted therapies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Estrogen Receptor alpha/genetics , Female , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Mutation , Neoplasm Metastasis , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics
2.
Ann Oncol ; 28(11): 2866-2873, 2017 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28945887

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Genomic changes that occur in breast cancer during the course of disease have been informed by sequencing of primary and metastatic tumor tissue. For patients with relapsed and metastatic disease, evolution of the breast cancer genome highlights the importance of using a recent sample for genomic profiling to guide clinical decision-making. Obtaining a metastatic tissue biopsy can be challenging, and analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood may provide a minimally invasive alternative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling was carried out on ctDNA from 254 female patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Peripheral blood samples were submitted by clinicians in the course of routine clinical care between May 2016 and March 2017. Sequencing of 62 genes was carried out to a median unique coverage depth of 7503×. Genomic alterations (GAs) in ctDNA were evaluated and compared with matched tissue samples and genomic datasets of tissue from breast cancer. RESULTS: At least 1 GA was reported in 78% of samples. Frequently altered genes were TP53 (38%), ESR1 (31%) and PIK3CA (31%). Temporally matched ctDNA and tissue samples were available for 14 patients; 89% of mutations detected in tissue were also detected in ctDNA. Diverse ESR1 GAs including mutation, rearrangement and amplification, were observed. Multiple concurrent ESR1 GAs were observed in 40% of ESR1-altered cases, suggesting polyclonal origin; ESR1 compound mutations were also observed in two cases. ESR1-altered cases harbored co-occurring GAs in PIK3CA (35%), FGFR1 (16%), ERBB2 (8%), BRCA1/2 (5%), and AKT1 (4%). CONCLUSIONS: GAs relevant to relapsed/metastatic breast cancer management were identified, including diverse ESR1 GAs. Genomic profiling of ctDNA demonstrated sensitive detection of mutations found in tissue. Detection of amplifications was associated with ctDNA fraction. Genomic profiling of ctDNA may provide a complementary and possibly alternative approach to tissue-based genomic testing for patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Circulating Tumor DNA/genetics , Clinical Decision-Making , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Mutation , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genomics/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/genetics
4.
Ann Oncol ; 26(4): 688-695, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25542926

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New data on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) regarding overall survival and disease progression-related outcomes in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy are presented in a meta-analysis of controlled trials of ESA use (epoetin α, epoetin ß, darbepoetin α, biosimilars). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A literature search identified reports from January 1997 through March 2014. We used company databases for Amgen, Inc., or Janssen studies and published data for other studies. Random-effects odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare results for patients randomized to ESA with those randomized to control. RESULTS: Deaths were reported for 571 of 2346 patients (24%) in the ESA groups and 523 of 2367 patients (22%) in the control groups [OR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.40]. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the effects of individual studies and exclusion of one study (BEST) resulted in an OR for death of 1.12 (95% CI 0.94-1.34). In seven studies reporting progression-related end points (N = 4197; ESA n = 2088; control n = 2109), the OR was 1.01 (95% CI 0.87-1.16) for ESA compared with control. CONCLUSIONS: After incorporating recent results of ESA use in patients with breast cancer, risks of survival and progression-free survival remain consistent with previously published data.


Subject(s)
Anemia/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Anemia/chemically induced , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Prognosis , Safety
5.
Curr Drug Targets ; 13(12): 1510-24, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22974394

ABSTRACT

Basal-like breast tumors and triple negative breast tumors are high-risk breast cancers that typically carry the poorest prognoses compared with HR (Hormone Receptor)-positive tumors and HER2 (Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2)-amplified tumors for known therapies. These subsets of breast cancers exhibit aggressive clinical behavior, pushing margins of invasion, poor clinical outcome, and derive limited benefit from current therapy. This clinical situation is contributed and further aggravated by their less known biology, lack of obvious molecular targets, absence of favorable biomarkers, and their limited response to single-drug therapy. In 2010, Oakman et al., remarked that current therapy fails to curtail the innate aggressive behavior of TNBC (Triple Negative Breast Cancer) in the majority of patients. The poor prognosis coupled with a lack of targeted use of therapies is responsible for the high mortality in this subtype. The present review will examine the existing literature and scrutinize the difficulties that have, to date, limited the understanding of the biology of these tumor cells, and provide a rationale for the development of the concept of combining subtype-specific and pathway-specific drug targets for the therapeutic intervention of the disease.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Animals , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/classification , Breast Neoplasms/enzymology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Genomics , Humans , Phenotype , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/metabolism , Precision Medicine , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Proteomics , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
6.
Br J Cancer ; 106(7): 1249-58, 2012 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22395661

ABSTRACT

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) increase red blood cell (RBC) production in bone marrow by activating the erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) on erythrocytic-progenitor cells. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are approved in the United States and Europe for treating anaemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy based on randomised, placebo-controlled trials showing that ESAs reduce RBC transfusions. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-safety issues include thromboembolic events and concerns regarding whether ESAs increase disease progression and/or mortality in cancer patients. Several trials have reported an association between ESA use and increased disease progression and/or mortality, whereas other trials in the same tumour types have not provided similar findings. This review thoroughly examines available evidence regarding whether ESAs affect disease progression. Both clinical-trial data on ESAs and disease progression, and preclinical data on how ESAs could affect tumour growth are summarised. Preclinical topics include (i) whether tumour cells express EpoR and could be directly stimulated to grow by ESA exposure and (ii) whether endothelial cells express EpoR and could be stimulated by ESA exposure to undergo angiogenesis and indirectly promote tumour growth. Although assessment and definition of disease progression vary across studies, the current clinical data suggest that ESAs may have little effect on disease progression in chemotherapy patients, and preclinical data indicate a direct or indirect effect of ESAs on tumour growth is not strongly supported.


Subject(s)
Hematinics/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Anemia/complications , Anemia/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Progression , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Hematinics/metabolism , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Neoplasms/blood supply , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptors, Erythropoietin/metabolism
7.
Br J Cancer ; 105(10): 1574-81, 2011 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22067903

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissue represents an immense but mainly untapped resource with respect to molecular profiling. The DASL (cDNA-mediated Annealing, Selection, extension, and Ligation) assay is a recently described, RT-PCR-based, highly multiplexed high-throughput gene expression platform developed by Illumina specifically for fragmented RNA typically obtained from FFPE specimens, which enables expression profiling. In order to extend the utility of the DASL assay for breast cancer, we have custom designed and validated a 512-gene human breast cancer panel. METHODS: The RNA from FFPE breast tumour specimens were analysed using the DASL assay. Breast cancer subtype was defined from pathology immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Differentially expressed genes between the IHC-defined subtypes were assessed by prediction analysis of microarrays (PAM) and then used in the analysis of two published data sets with clinical outcome data. RESULTS: Gene expression signatures on our custom breast cancer panel were very reproducible between replicates (average Pearson's R²=0.962) and the 152 genes common to both the standard cancer DASL panel (Illumina) and our breast cancer DASL panel were similarly expressed for samples run on both panels (average R²=0.877). Moreover, expression of ESR1, PGR and ERBB2 corresponded well with their respective pathology-defined IHC status. A 30-gene set indicative of IHC-defined breast cancer subtypes was found to segregate samples based on their subtype in our data sets and published data sets. Furthermore, several of these genes were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in these previously published data sets, indicating that they are biomarkers of the different breast cancer subtypes and the prognostic outcomes associated with these subtypes. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the ability to expression profile degraded RNA transcripts derived from FFPE tissues on the DASL platform. Importantly, we have identified a 30-biomarker gene set that can classify breast cancer into subtypes and have shown that a subset of these markers is prognostic of OS and RFS.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Paraffin Embedding , Base Sequence , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , DNA Primers , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Polymerase Chain Reaction
9.
Br J Cancer ; 102(5): 815-26, 2010 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20145614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The expression of side-population (SP) cells and their relation to tumour-initiating cells (T-ICs) have been insufficiently studied in breast cancer (BC). We therefore evaluated primary cell cultures derived from patients and a panel of human BC cell lines with luminal- or basal-molecular signatures for the presence of SP and BC stem cell markers. METHODS: The SPs from luminal-type BC were analysed for BC T-IC characteristics, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), ERalpha, IGFBP7 expression and their ability to initiate tumours in non-obese diabetic severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice. Pharmacological modulators were used to assess the effects of HER2 signalling and breast cancer-resistance protein (BCRP) expression on SPs. RESULTS: The SP was more prevalent in the luminal subtype of BC compared with the basal subtype. HER2 expression was significantly correlated with the occurrence of an SP (r(2)=0.75, P=0.0003). Disappearance of SP in the presence of Ko143, a specific inhibitor of the ATP-binding cassette transporter BCRP, suggests that BCRP is the predominant transporter expressed in this population. The SP also decreased in the presence of HER2 signalling inhibitors AG825 or trastuzumab, strengthening the notion that HER2 contributed to the SP phenotype, likely through downstream AKT signalling. The SP cells from luminal-type MCF-7 cells with enforced expression of HER2, and primary cells with luminal-like properties from a BC patient, displayed enrichment in cells capable of repopulating tumours in NOD/SCID mice. Engraftment of SP cells was inhibited by pretreatment with AG825 or by in vivo treatment with trastuzumab. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate an important role of HER2 in regulating SP and hence T-ICs in BC, which may account for the poor responsiveness of HER2-positive BCs to chemotherapy, as well as their aggressiveness.


Subject(s)
ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2 , ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Blotting, Western , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Mice , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, Nude , Mice, SCID , Neoplasm Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt/metabolism , Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors , Signal Transduction , Trastuzumab , Tumor Cells, Cultured
10.
Br J Cancer ; 102(3): 570-6, 2010 Feb 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20068566

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have indicated that prostate cancer patients with the TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion have a higher risk of recurrence. To identify markers associated with TMPRSS2-ERG fusion and prognostic of biochemical recurrence, we analysed a cohort of 139 men with prostate cancer for 502 molecular markers. METHODS: RNA from radical prostatectomy tumour specimens was analysed using cDNA-mediated, annealing, selection, extension and ligation (DASL) to determine mRNAs associated with TMPRSS2-ERG T1/E4 fusion and prognostic of biochemical recurrence. Differentially expressed mRNAs in T1/E4-positive tumours were determined using significance analysis of microarrays (false discovery rate (FDR) <5%). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression determined genes, gene signatures and clinical factors prognostic of recurrence (P-value <0.05, log-rank test). Analysis of two prostate microarray studies (GSE1065 and GSE8402) validated the findings. RESULTS: In the 139 patients from this study and from a 455-patient Swedish cohort, 15 genes in common were differentially regulated in T1/E4 fusion-positive tumours (FDR <0.05). The most significant mRNAs in both cohorts coded ERG. Nine genes were found prognostic of recurrence in this study and in a 596-patient Minnesota cohort. A molecular recurrence score was significant in prognosticating recurrence (P-value 0.000167) and remained significant in multivariate analysis of a mixed clinical model considering Gleason score and TMPRSS2-ERG fusion status. CONCLUSIONS: TMPRSS2-ERG T1/E4 fusion-positive tumours had differentially regulated mRNAs observed in multiple studies, the most significant one coded for ERG. Several mRNAs were consistently associated with biochemical recurrence and have potential clinical utility but will require further validation for successful translation.


Subject(s)
Gene Fusion , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Prognosis , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , RNA, Messenger/analysis
12.
Br J Cancer ; 99(1): 1-5, 2008 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18506149

ABSTRACT

The clinical experience recently reported with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting drugs confirms the synergistic interactions observed between these compounds and conventional cytotoxic agents, which were previously established at the preclinical stage. There are, however, examples of major gaps between the bench and the bedside. Particularly demonstrative is the failure of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (gefitinib and erlotinib) combined with chemotherapy in pretreated nonsmall cell lung cancer patients. These discrepancies can be due to several factors such as the methodology used to evaluate TKI plus cytotoxic agent combinations in preclinical models and the insufficient consideration given to the importance of the drug sequences for the tested combinations. Recent advances in understanding the biologic basis of acquired resistance to these agents have great potential to improve their clinical effectiveness. The purpose of this review is to critically examine the experimental conditions of the preclinical background for anti-EGFR drug-cytotoxic agent combinations and to attempt to explain the gap between clinical observations and preclinical data.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Drug Synergism , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology
13.
Ann Oncol ; 19(6): 1090-6, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18296421

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab (Herceptin(R)) improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer. We aimed to assess the magnitude of its clinical benefit for subpopulations defined by nodal and steroid hormone receptor status using data from the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HERA is an international multicenter randomized trial comparing 1 or 2 years of trastuzumab treatment with observation after standard chemotherapy in women with HER2-positive breast cancer. In total, 1703 women randomized to 1-year trastuzumab and 1698 women randomized to observation were included in these analyses. Median follow-up was 23.5 months. The primary endpoint was DFS. RESULTS: The overall hazard ratio (HR) for trastuzumab versus observation was 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.76; P < 0.0001], ranging from 0.46 to 0.82 for subgroups. Estimated improvement in 3-year DFS in subgroups ranged from +11.3% to +0.6%. Patients with the best prognosis (those with node-negative disease and tumors 1.1-2.0 cm) had benefit similar to the overall cohort (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.26-1.07; 3-year DFS improvement +4.6%, 95% CI -4.0% to 13.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant trastuzumab therapy reduces the risk of relapse similarly across subgroups defined by nodal status and steroid hormone receptor status, even those at relatively low risk for relapse.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Female , Humans , Internationality , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Survival Analysis , Trastuzumab
14.
J Chemother ; 19(5): 546-53, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18073154

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the antiproliferative effects of C-1311 (Symadex), a member of the imidazoacridinone family, in human colorectal cancer cells. In the in vitro screen, C-1311 led to the most prominent growth inhibition in HT29, HCT116, and COLO205 cell lines when compared to oxaliplatin, CPT-11, DFUR, 5-FU and capecitabine. The GI(50)values for C-1311 ranged from 0.12 to 0.83 microM and the TGI concentrations (resulting in total growth inhibition) were 6- to 13-fold lower than those of other agents. In the hollow fiber assay in vivo, C-1311 caused 77% growth inhibition of HT29 in the intraperitoneal site as compared to paclitaxel (17% growth inhibition). In the subcutaneous site, C-1311 produced 57% growth inhibition while paclitaxel showed no cell growth inhibition effects. This unique cytotoxicity profile of C-1311 warrants further investigation and supports its clinical development in colon cancer patients. Symadex (C-1311) is currently in phase 2 clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Aminoacridines/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aminoacridines/chemistry , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Camptothecin/pharmacology , Capecitabine , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Fluorouracil/analogs & derivatives , Fluorouracil/pharmacology , HT29 Cells , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Irinotecan , Mice , Mice, Nude , Organoplatinum Compounds/pharmacology , Oxaliplatin , Paclitaxel/pharmacology
15.
Br J Cancer ; 97(1): 58-64, 2007 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17551498

ABSTRACT

Xanafide, a DNA-intercalating agent and topoisomerase II inhibitor, has previously demonstrated comparable cytotoxicity to the parent drug amonafide (NSC 308847). The current study was conducted to investigate further the anti-proliferative effects of xanafide in human breast cancer cell lines, in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro activity of xanafide against MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, SKBR-3 and T47D cell lines was compared to that of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine and doxorubicin. In MCF-7, xanafide demonstrated comparable total growth inhibition (TGI) concentrations to the taxanes and lower TGI values than gemcitabine, vinorelbine and doxorubicin. MCF-7 (oestrogen receptor (ER)+/p53 wild-type) was the most sensitive cell line to xanafide. MDA-MB-231 and SKBR-3 exhibited similar sensitivity to xanafide. T47 D (ER+/p53 mutated), showed no response to this agent. The in vivo activity of xanafide was further compared to that of docetaxel in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines using the hollow fibre assay. Xanafide was slightly more potent than docetaxel, at its highest dose in MCF-7 cell line, whereas docetaxel was more effective than xanafide in MDA-MB-231 cell line. Our results show that there is no relationship between sensitivity of these cell lines to xanafide and cellular levels of both isoforms of topoisomerase II and suggest that ER and p53 status and their crosstalk may predict the responsiveness or resistance of breast cancer patients to xanafide.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Imides/therapeutic use , Isoquinolines/therapeutic use , Naphthalimides/therapeutic use , Adenine , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/radiation effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Humans , Mice , Mice, Nude , Organophosphonates
16.
Br J Cancer ; 90(2): 476-82, 2004 Jan 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14735196

ABSTRACT

Specific chromosomal abnormalities are increasingly recognised to be associated with particular tumour subtypes. These cytogenetic abnormalities define the sites of specific genes, the alteration of which is implicated in the neoplastic process. We used comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) to examine DNA from different breast and ovarian cancer cell lines for variations in DNA sequence copy number compared with the same normal control. We also compared different sources of the MCF7 breast line by both CGH and cDNA expression arrays. Some of the differences between the subcultures were extensive and involved large regions of the chromosome. Differences between the four subcultures were observed for gains of 2q, 5p, 5q, 6q, 7p, 7q, 9q, 10p, 11q, 13q, 14q, 16q, 18p and 20p, and losses of 4q, 5p, 5q, 6q, 7q, 8p, 11p, 11q, 12q, 13q, 15q, 19p, 19q, 20p, 21q, 22q and Xp. However, few variations were found between two subcultures examined, 5 months apart, from the same initial source. The RNA arrays also demonstrated considerable variation between the three different subcultures, with only 43% of genes expressed at the same levels in all three. Moreover, the patterns of the expressed genes did not always reflect our observed CGH aberrations. These results demonstrate extensive genomic instability and variation in RNA expression during subculture and provide supportive data for evidence that cell lines do evolve in culture, thereby weakening the direct relevance of such cultures as models of human cancer. This work also reinforces the concern that comparisons of published analyses of cultures of the same name may be dangerous.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , DNA, Neoplasm/analysis , Genomic Instability , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Cell Culture Techniques , Chromosome Aberrations , Female , Humans , Nucleic Acid Hybridization , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Reproducibility of Results
17.
Endocr Relat Cancer ; 10(4): 561-78, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14713267

ABSTRACT

The IGF system performs a fundamental role in the regulation of cellular proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. These diverse biological actions are mediated primarily by IGF association with the type I IGF receptor (IGF-IR), which is in turn regulated by a group of high-affinity IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP-1 to -6). All of the IGFBPs can have growth-inhibitory effects by competitively binding IGFs and preventing their association with the IGF-IR. IGFBP-3 is the most abundant binding protein in the circulation and controls the actions of the IGFs by regulating their distribution and bioavailability to target tissues. Disruptions in the balance of IGF system components leading to excessive proliferation and survival signals have been implicated in the development of different tumor types. Epidemiological evidence indicates that increased levels of IGF-I, reduced levels of IGFBP-3 or an increased ratio of IGF-I to IGFBP-3 in the circulation are associated with an increased risk for the development of several common cancers, including those of the breast, prostate, lung and colon. The results of preclinical studies indicate that a diversity of interventions which antagonize IGF-IR signaling or augment IGFBP-3 function inhibit tumor cell growth in models of human cancers. A more comprehensive understanding of the interplay between cellular targets of the IGF system and antineoplastic agents will facilitate the development of novel strategies for the prevention and treatment of cancer.


Subject(s)
Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins/metabolism , Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptor, IGF Type 1/metabolism , Somatomedins/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/metabolism , Receptor, IGF Type 1/antagonists & inhibitors , Signal Transduction/physiology
19.
Oncology ; 61 Suppl 2: 31-6, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11694785

ABSTRACT

Preclinical and phase I/II studies of Herceptin demonstrated a dose-related, non-linear pharmacokinetic profile. The results of a dose-finding study supported a regimen comprising an initial intravenous (i.v.) dose of 4 mg/kg with subsequent weekly doses of 2 mg/kg. However, pharmacokinetic and safety data suggested that increased dose and reduced frequency of Herceptin administration are feasible. In addition, evidence shows that Herceptin plus paclitaxel has additive antitumor efficacy in vitro, and this regimen produces significant clinical benefits. These observations form the rationale for conducting a phase I/II trial of Herceptin (8 mg/kg initial dose, 6 mg/kg maintenance dose) plus paclitaxel, both given 3-weekly. Preliminary results are promising, with serum trough Herceptin concentrations being similar and AUC being greater than those observed with weekly Herceptin plus 3-weekly paclitaxel. Two further trials are proposed: 3-weekly Herceptin as first-line monotherapy of metastatic breast cancer; and 3-weekly Herceptin with the oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, Xeloda (capecitabine). Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of Herceptin would further simplify administration and studies are also underway to clinically evaluate s.c. administration of Herceptin in combination with paclitaxel. With the recent development of oral taxanes, it is predicted that combinations including an oral taxane, Xeloda and either 3-weekly or possibly s.c. Herceptin may become future therapies for breast cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Abdominal Muscles , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Area Under Curve , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Capecitabine , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Antagonism , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Drug Synergism , Feasibility Studies , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/antagonists & inhibitors , Half-Life , Haplorhini , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Injections, Subcutaneous , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Metastasis , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Safety , Trastuzumab , Treatment Outcome , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
20.
Oncology ; 61 Suppl 2: 83-91, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11694792

ABSTRACT

Current therapeutic strategies for primary breast cancer aim to provide improvements in outcome with minimal toxicity to the patient. However, annual relapse rates of up to 12 to 13% during the first 10 years after treatment are seen, and although toxicity has been reduced, it remains a problem in a patient population that is largely asymptomatic. Thus, there is a clear need for more effective therapies. Amplification/overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is an early event in the development of a significant proportion of breast tumors. This abnormality has been shown to have a detrimental effect on prognosis, may predict the outcome of therapies such as tamoxifen and anthracyclines, and provides a target for the novel therapy, Herceptin. Herceptin is effective and well tolerated in the metastatic setting, making it an ideal candidate for use in adjuvant breast cancer therapy. This has led to the design of a number of trials that aim to provide conclusive evidence as rapidly as possible that Herceptin is well tolerated and effective in the adjuvant setting while also addressing the question of which regimen provides greatest benefit. This review describes these trials and explains how differences in practice between North America and Europe have influenced trial design.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/analogs & derivatives , Taxoids , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Docetaxel , Drug Interactions , Europe , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Proteins/analysis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , North America , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Palliative Care , Pilot Projects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Research Design , Safety , Survival Analysis , Tamoxifen/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...