Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Audiol ; 49(9): 657-66, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20583945

ABSTRACT

Current cochlear implants can operate at high pulse rates. The effect of increasing pulse rate on speech performance is not yet clear. Habituation to low rates may affect the outcome. This paper presents the results of three subsequent studies using different experimental paradigms, applying the Nucleus CI24RE device, and conducted by ten European implant teams. Pulse rate per channel varied from 500 to 3500 pulses per second with ACE and from 1200 to 3500 pps with CIS strategy. The results showed that the first rate presented had little effect on the finally preferred rate. Lower rates were preferred. The effect of pulse rate on word scores of post-linguistic implantees was small; high rates tended to give lower scores. However, there were no significant differences between the word scores across subjects if collected at the individually preferred pulse rate. High pulse rates were preferred when the post-implantation threshold was low.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implants , Correction of Hearing Impairment , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Speech , Auditory Threshold , Electric Stimulation , Europe , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/psychology , Humans , Loudness Perception , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Fitting , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...