Results from a new efficacy and safety analysis of the REGENERATE trial of obeticholic acid for treatment of pre-cirrhotic fibrosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a first-in-class farnesoid X receptor agonist and antifibrotic agent in development for the treatment of pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We aimed to validate the original 18-month liver biopsy analysis from the phase III REGENERATE trial of OCA for the treatment of NASH with a consensus panel analysis, provide additional histology data in a larger population, and evaluate safety from >8,000 total patient-years' exposure with nearly 1,000 participants receiving study drug for >4 years. METHODS: Digitized whole-slide images were evaluated independently by panels of three pathologists using the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system. Primary endpoints were (1) ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH or (2) NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. Safety was assessed by laboratory values and adverse events. RESULTS: Prespecified efficacy analyses included 931 participants. The proportion of participants achieving a ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH was 22.4% for OCA 25 mg vs. 9.6% for placebo (p <0.0001). More participants receiving OCA 25 mg vs. placebo achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis (6.5% vs. 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.093). Histology data in a larger population of 1,607 participants supported these results. Safety data included 2,477 participants. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and deaths was not substantively different across treatment groups. Pruritus was the most common TEAE. Rates of adjudicated hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular events were low and similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the antifibrotic effect of OCA 25 mg. OCA was generally well tolerated over long-term dosing. These data support a positive benefit:risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) often have liver scarring (fibrosis), which causes an increased risk of liver-related illness and death. Preventing progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis or reversing fibrosis are the main goals of drug development for NASH. In this clinical trial of obeticholic acid (OCA) in patients with NASH (REGENERATE), we reaffirmed our previous results demonstrating that OCA was superior to placebo in improving fibrosis using a more rigorous consensus panel analysis of liver biopsies taken at month 18. We also showed that OCA treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of serum liver biochemistries and liver stiffness measurements compared with placebo, even in participants in whom histologic fibrosis did not change at 18 months, providing evidence that the benefit of OCA extends beyond what is captured by the ordinal NASH CRN scoring system. OCA was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile supporting a positive benefit: risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH.

Objective and self-reported evidence of dextromethorphan antitussive efficacy in children, aged 6-11 years, with acute cough due to the common cold.

OBJECTIVE: To determine objective and subjective endpoints most suitable for evaluating antitussive efficacy of dextromethorphan hydrobromide (DXM) in children. Spontaneous resolution of acute cough and large placebo effects are impediments to evaluating antitussive efficacy. Another impediment is paucity of age-appropriate, validated cough assessment tools. METHODS: This was a multiple-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, pilot clinical study in children, aged 6-11 years, with cough due to the common cold. Eligible subjects met entry criteria and qualified by completing a run-in period where coughs were recorded with a cough monitor after they were dosed with sweet syrup. They were subsequently randomized to receive DXM or placebo over 4 days. Coughs were recorded during the initial 24 h; subjective assessments of cough severity and frequency were self-reported daily during treatment. RESULTS: Data from 128 evaluable subjects (67 DXM; 61 placebo) were analyzed. Total coughs over 24-hours (primary endpoint) and cough frequency during daytime were reduced by 21.0% and 25.5%, respectively, with DXM relative to placebo. Also, greater reductions in cough severity and frequency were self-reported with DXM. These findings were statistically significant and medically relevant. No effects were detected between treatments for nighttime cough rates or impact of cough on sleep. Multiple doses of DXM and placebo were generally well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Evidence of DXM antitussive efficacy was shown in children using objective and subjective assessment tools validated in pediatric populations. Diurnal variation of cough frequency over 24 h reduced the assay sensitivity needed to detect treatment differences at nighttime, as coughs/hour decreased during sleep for both groups.

Efficacy of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Compared With Individual Monocomponents in Adult Male Subjects With Endotoxin-Induced Fever: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated antipyretic efficacy and onset of a novel fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ibuprofen (IBU; 250 mg) and acetaminophen (APAP; 500 mg) compared with placebo and IBU or APAP monocomponents. MET: This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, full-factorial study was conducted in healthy males aged 18 to 55 years with pyrexia induced by intravenous administration of reference standard endotoxin (RSE). After attainment of an oral temperature ≥38.1°C, subjects were randomized 3:3:3:1 to a double-blind single oral dose of FDC IBU/APAP 250 mg/500 mg, APAP 500 mg, IBU 250 mg, or placebo. Oral temperature was measured every 10 minutes for 2 hours, then every 30 minutes until 8 hours postdose. Time-weighted sum of temperature differences from baseline to 8 hours (WSTD0-8) after study medication administration was the primary efficacy end point. Secondary end points included WSTD scores from 0 to 2 hours, 0 to 4 hours, 0 to 6 hours, and 6 to 8 hours; time to return to "normal" temperature; time to rescue medication use; and global drug evaluation. Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs). FINDINGS: Two hundred ninety subjects were randomized; 273 were included in the primary efficacy analysis. WSTD0-8 was significantly better for FDC IBU/APAP 250 mg/500 mg (P = 0.002), IBU 250 mg (P = 0.030), and APAP 500 mg (P = 0.023) versus placebo; there were no significant differences between active treatments. For WSTD0-2, only the FDC was statistically significant versus placebo (P = 0.004). All active treatments were significantly better (P < 0.05) for WSTD0-4 and WSTD0-6 versus placebo; there were no differences in WSTD6-8 between cohorts. Temperature returned to normal during the 8-hour treatment period in ∼50% of subjects in each cohort. Only 1 subject (IBU cohort) took rescue medication. Post hoc analyses at early time points revealed significant treatment differences favoring FDC versus placebo and IBU for the WSTD from baseline during the 50- to 110-minute posttreatment window; for WSTD from baseline during the 80- to 110-minute posttreatment window, FDC provided significant treatment differences versus placebo and both monocomponents. Overall, 223 (76.9%) of 290 subjects experienced AEs related to RSE; only 2 subjects experienced treatment-related AEs (FDC, rash; placebo, ear pain). IMPLICATIONS: Although the primary end point was not met, these results suggest that FDC IBU/APAP 250 mg/500 mg provides effective antipyresis with a faster onset versus equal doses of IBU and APAP alone. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02761980.

Safety and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of ibuprofen and acetaminophen: pooled analysis of phase 1-3 clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: An ibuprofen (IBU)/acetaminophen (APAP) fixed-dose combination (FDC) for over-the-counter (OTC) use was developed with the goal of providing the same effective analgesic activity as full doses of the individual monocomponents, while reducing individual monocomponent drug exposures. Here, the safety and tolerability of the FDC is characterized using pooled safety data from phase 1-3 clinical trials in the FDC development program. METHODS: We conducted a pooled safety analysis of data from 7 clinical trials: three phase 1 pharmacokinetic trials, a phase 2 proof-of-concept trial, and three phase 3 trials (a single- and a multiple-dose trial in a dental pain model and a single-dose trial in an induced-fever model). Safety and tolerability of the FDC were assessed by adverse events (AEs) for the total group and subgroups (age, sex, race). RESULTS: A total of 1,477 participants were enrolled in the 7 trials; 715 were treated with FDC IBU/APAP, 432 with IBU monotherapy, 330 with APAP monotherapy, and 156 with placebo. Most subjects were white (86.5%), and 44% were female. Two trials enrolling 195 adolescents accounted for 13.2% of the overall study population. All-causality treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 19.7% of the 1477 participants. Nausea (13.5%), vomiting (7.4%), dizziness (4.5%), headache (1.2%), and feeling hot (1.0%) were the only TEAEs reported in ≥1% of subjects. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 1.8% of the subjects in the overall population. The incidence of AEs, including treatment-related AEs, was consistently lower in all active treatment groups than in the placebo group; this also applied to subgroups according to sex, race, and age, including adolescents aged 12-17 years. The higher rate of AEs with placebo was likely due to lack of pain/fever control. CONCLUSION: Single-dose or short-course FDC IBU/APAP OTC use was well tolerated, with an AE profile similar to its IBU and APAP monocomponents. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION: NCT01559259; NCT02912650; NCT02837952; NCT02761980. The pharmacokinetic studies (n = 3) did not require registration.

Evaluation of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen in the Treatment of Postsurgical Dental Pain: A Pilot, Dose-Ranging, Randomized Study.

INTRODUCTION: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen provide analgesia via different mechanisms of action and do not exhibit drug-drug interactions; therefore, combining low doses of each may provide greater efficacy without compromising safety. OBJECTIVES: The present study assessed the analgesic efficacy of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of ibuprofen/acetaminophen (IBU/APAP) compared with ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo. METHODS: This 12-h, double-blind, proof-of-concept study compared three FDCs of IBU/APAP (200 mg/500 mg, 250 mg/500 mg, and 300 mg/500 mg) with ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe pain following third molar extraction. The primary endpoint was the time-weighted sum of pain relief and pain intensity difference scores from 0 to 8 h after dosing (SPRID[4]0-8). Time to meaningful pain relief (TMPR), duration of pain relief, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. RESULTS: In total, 394 patients were randomized. All active treatments were superior to placebo for SPRID[4]0-8 (all p < 0.001) but not significantly different from ibuprofen 400 mg. Median TMPR with FDCs and ibuprofen (44.5-54.1 and 56.2 min, respectively) was faster than with placebo (> 720 min; all p < 0.001 vs. placebo). Duration of pain relief was similar with the FDCs and ibuprofen 400 mg (9.7 -11.1 h) and longer than with placebo (1.6 h; all p < 0.001). AE incidence was comparable with all treatments. CONCLUSION: Each IBU/APAP FDC provided analgesic efficacy comparable to that with ibuprofen 400 mg and superior to that with placebo. Each FDC provided MPR in < 1 h, duration of pain relief > 9 h, and tolerability similar to that with ibuprofen and placebo. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT01559259.

Efficacy and Safety of Single and Multiple Doses of a Fixed-dose Combination of Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen in the Treatment of Postsurgical Dental Pain: Results From 2 Phase 3, Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Studies.

OBJECTIVES: A previous pilot study demonstrated that various fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of ibuprofen (IBU) and acetaminophen (APAP) provided analgesic efficacy comparable to a higher dose of IBU, with the same safety profile. These studies further evaluated the chosen FDC IBU/APAP 250/500 mg formulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two phase 3 dental pain studies enrolled healthy young patients with ≥moderate pain after ≥3 third molar extractions who received single-dose FDC IBU/APAP 250/500 mg, IBU 250 mg, APAP 650 mg, or placebo evaluated over 12 hours (study 1) or multiple-dose FDC or placebo every 8 hours, evaluated over 48 hours (study 2). Time-weighted sum of pain intensity differences over 8 (SPID[11]0-8) and 24 (SPID[11]0-24) hours were primary outcomes, respectively. Time to meaningful pain relief and duration of pain relief were assessed; tolerability was evaluated by adverse events. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized in study 1; 123 in study 2. Study 1: SPID[11]0-8 favored FDC significantly over placebo, IBU, and APAP (P<0.001, P=0.008, and P<0.001, respectively); study 2: SPID[11]0-24 significantly favored FDC over placebo (P<0.001), with sustained efficacy during multiple dosing. Time to meaningful pain relief occurred within 1 hour; pain relief duration was >8 hours in both studies. Adverse event rates were lowest with the FDC. DISCUSSION: FDC IBU/APAP 250/500 mg provides superior analgesic efficacy to individual monocomponents (IBU 250 mg and APAP 650 mg), a rapid onset of action, >8-hour duration of pain relief, is generally well tolerated, and may provide an additional nonopioid treatment option for acute pain.

Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen in Healthy Adult and Adolescent Populations.

INTRODUCTION: A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ibuprofen and acetaminophen has been developed that provides greater analgesic efficacy than either agent alone at the same doses without increasing the risk for adverse events. METHODS: We report three clinical phase I studies designed to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the FDC of ibuprofen/acetaminophen 250/500 mg (administered as two tablets of ibuprofen 125 mg/acetaminophen 250 mg) in comparison with its individual components administered alone or together, and to determine the effect of food on the PK of the FDC. Two studies in healthy adults aged 18-55 years used a crossover design in which subjects received a single dose of each treatment with a 2-day washout period between each. In the third study, the bioavailability of ibuprofen and acetaminophen from a single oral dose of the FDC was assessed in healthy adolescents aged 12-17 years, inclusive. RESULTS: A total of 35 and 46 subjects were enrolled in the two adult studies, respectively, and 21 were enrolled in the adolescent study. Ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the FDC were bioequivalent to the monocomponents administered alone or together. With food, the maximum concentration (Cmax) for ibuprofen and acetaminophen from the FDC was reduced by 36% and 37%, respectively, and time to Cmax (i.e. tmax) was delayed. Overall drug exposure to ibuprofen or acetaminophen in the fed versus fasted states was similar. In adolescents, overall exposure to acetaminophen and ibuprofen was comparable with that in adults, with a slightly higher overall exposure to ibuprofen. Exposure to acetaminophen and ibuprofen in adolescents aged 12-14 years was slightly higher versus those aged 15-17 years. Adverse events were similar across all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The FDC of ibuprofen/acetaminophen 250/500 mg has a PK profile similar to its monocomponent constituents when administered separately or coadministered, indicating no drug-drug interactions and no formulation effects. Similar to previous findings for the individual components, the rates of absorption of ibuprofen and acetaminophen from the FDC were slightly delayed in the presence of food. Overall, adolescents had similar exposures to acetaminophen and ibuprofen as adults, while younger adolescents had slightly greater exposure than older adolescents, probably due to their smaller body size. The FDC was generally well tolerated.

Actual use of and adherence to ibuprofen 400 mg tablet dosing instructions in a simulated OTC environment
.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate adherence of US consumers to proposed label directions for a new 400 mg ibuprofen formulation. METHODS: In this single-arm, open-label, multicenter, 30-day study simulating an over-the-counter (OTC)-like environment, US analgesic consumers reviewed proposed product packaging for a new 400 mg ibuprofen formulation and made a purchase decision. Purchasers used the product as needed and recorded use over 30 days. Outcomes included the percentage of participants who exhibited correct or acceptable product use for the primary endpoint (not exceeding 1,200 mg/day > 2 times during the study) or secondary endpoint (not exceeding 400 mg/dose > 2 times during the study) and adherence to the labeled dosing interval of 6 - 8 hours. Primary endpoint success was met if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was ≥ 85%. RESULTS: Of 685 purchasers providing use data, correct or acceptable use behavior occurred in 95.2% (95% CI: 93.6%, 96.8%) regarding total daily dose and in 84.4% (95% CI: 81.7%, 87.1%) regarding the number of tablets taken per dosing occasion. Most participants (87.3%) never used > 1,200 mg/day or took > 1 tablet/dose (78.1%). Nearly 43% of subjects re-dosed within 6 hours of the previous dose; of these, ~ 82% re-dosed between the 4- and 6-hour time intervals. Adverse events were consistent with prior ibuprofen 200 mg experience. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that a majority of US consumers would be able to use OTC ibuprofen 400 mg tablets in a manner consistent with product labeling. Misuse rates were low and unlikely to generate an excess risk of clinically important adverse events.
.

Onset of analgesia and efficacy of ibuprofen sodium in postsurgical dental pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled study versus standard ibuprofen.

OBJECTIVES: A novel, immediate-release tablet formulation of ibuprofen (IBU) sodium dihydrate, Advil Film Coated Tablets (IBUNa), has been developed that is absorbed faster than standard IBU tablets. The objective of the current study was to compare the efficacy and onset of analgesia of this new formulation with standard IBU tablets after a single dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (N=316) with at least moderate baseline postsurgical dental pain were randomized to 400 mg IBUNa, Advil (IBUAdv), Motrin (IBUMot), or placebo. Primary endpoints were time-weighted sum of pain relief (PR) and pain intensity differences over 8 hours (SPRID 0-8) and time to onset of meaningful pain relief (TMPR) measured by the double-stopwatch method. RESULTS: SPRID 0-8 was significantly greater for IBUNa and the other active treatments versus placebo (P<0.001). IBUNa had a significantly earlier TMPR versus placebo, pooled IBUAdv/IBUMot, and IBUMot (P<0.001 for all), and a marginally faster TMPR (P=0.075) versus IBUAdv. Results for secondary endpoints were similar. Adverse events were comparable across treatment groups, with gastrointestinal disorders being most frequently reported. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. DISCUSSION: This novel formulation of IBUNa provided superior overall PR compared with placebo and more rapid onset of analgesic effect compared with standard IBU tablets. Rapid PR is important in the treatment of acute pain, including dental pain, and this IBUNa formulation represents a new treatment option for rapid PR.

Onset of analgesia with ibuprofen sodium in tension-type headache: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Ibuprofen is known to be efficacious in the treatment of tension-type headache, the most common form of primary headache. A novel tablet formulation of ibuprofen sodium is more rapidly absorbed than standard ibuprofen. This study evaluated onset of analgesia and overall efficacy of ibuprofen sodium in episodic-type tension headache (ETTH) compared with standard ibuprofen and placebo. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, single-center, parallel-group study included adults aged 18-65 years with ≥4 moderately severe ETTHs per month for 6 months. Within 45 minutes of onset of at least moderately severe ETTH, subjects were randomized 2:2:1 to receive a single oral dose of ibuprofen sodium tablets (Advil® Film Coated; 2 × 256 mg [equivalent to 400 mg standard ibuprofen]), standard ibuprofen tablets (Motrin®; 2 × 200 mg), or placebo. The coprimary end points were time-weighted sum of pain relief rating and pain intensity difference scores over 3 hours (SPRID 0-3) and time to meaningful pain relief (MPR) assessed by double-stopwatch method. RESULTS: A total of 226 subjects were randomized to ibuprofen sodium (n = 91), standard ibuprofen (n = 89), and placebo (n = 46). Demographics and baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Mean SPRID 0-3 scores were significantly superior (P < .001) for ibuprofen sodium (9.6) and standard ibuprofen (9.8) versus placebo (3.5), but were not significantly different from each other (P = .812). Time to MPR was significantly (P < .001) shorter for ibuprofen sodium and standard ibuprofen compared with placebo (median 40.6, 48.5, and >180 minutes, respectively). Time to MPR was numerically faster for ibuprofen sodium than standard ibuprofen. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .253) using the protocol-specified analysis but was (P = .022) in a post hoc analysis using the Gehan-Wilcoxon test, which assigns higher weights to earlier events. (The post hoc analysis was performed because Kaplan-Meier graphs and results for time to first perceptible relief favored ibuprofen sodium over standard ibuprofen at earlier time points.) There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This novel ibuprofen sodium tablet provided rapid, efficacious relief of ETTH and was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01362491.

Safety of a novel formulation of ibuprofen sodium compared with standard ibuprofen and placebo.

BACKGROUND: Ibuprofen (IBU) is an efficacious over-the-counter analgesic/antipyretic with adverse event (AE) rates comparable to placebo. IBU sodium (IBU(Na)) is a newer, more soluble form that is absorbed faster than standard IBU, leading to more rapid analgesia. Although its safety and tolerability are expected to be comparable to standard IBU, this has not yet been reported. METHODS: Pooled analysis comparing the safety of single-dose IBU(Na) (512 mg; equivalent to 400 mg IBU free acid; n = 362) with standard IBU tablets (400 mg; n = 342) and placebo (n = 187) across five Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies evaluating IBU(Na) for treatment of postoperative dental pain, tension-type headache, or fever. RESULTS: Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 5% of cases in the IBU(Na) group (25 events), 6.4% of cases in the standard IBU group (41 events), and 10.2% of cases in the placebo group (31 events). The most frequent TEAEs were in the following Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) System Organ Classes: gastrointestinal disorders (2.8, 3.2, and 5.9% for IBU(Na), standard IBU, and placebo, respectively), nervous system disorders (1.4, 3.5, and 3.7% for IBU(Na), standard IBU, and placebo, respectively), and general disorders and administration-site conditions (1.1, 1.5, and 2.1% for IBU(Na), standard IBU, and placebo, respectively). Nausea was the most common TEAE (2.5, 2.6, and 5.9% for IBU(Na), standard IBU, and placebo, respectively). Only two AEs were considered related to treatment: pruritus (n = 1, IBU(Na)) and nausea (n = 1, placebo). Of those subjects reporting ≥ 1 TEAE, 44.4, 36.4, and 89.5% of subjects in the IBU(Na), standard IBU, and placebo groups, respectively, received rescue medication. CONCLUSION: IBU(Na) has a favorable safety profile comparable to those of standard IBU tablets and placebo in single-dose studies evaluating analgesic or antipyretic efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Registry Numbers: Dental pain studies: NCT01098747 and NCT01216163; headache studies: NCT01077973 and NCT01362491; pyresis study: NCT01035346.

Ibuprofen sodium is absorbed faster than standard Ibuprofen tablets: results of two open-label, randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic studies.

BACKGROUND: A novel ibuprofen (IBU) formulation, Advil(®) Film-Coated Tablets (IBUNa), was developed. OBJECTIVE: Pharmacokinetic comparison of IBUNa versus other IBU formulations. STUDY DESIGN: Two randomized, single-dose, open-label, five-way crossover pharmacokinetic studies. SETTING: Inpatient research clinic. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one healthy adult volunteers. INTERVENTION: Study 1: In three periods, fasted subjects received 400-mg IBU dose equivalents as IBUNa 2 × 256 mg, Advil(®) Liqui-Gels(®) (IBULG) 2 × 200 mg, and Motrin(®) IB (IBUMot) 2 × 200 mg tablets. In two periods following a high-fat breakfast, subjects received 400-mg IBU dose equivalents as IBUNa 2 × 256 mg and IBULG 2 × 200 mg. Study 2: In five study periods, fasted subjects received 400-mg IBU dose equivalents as IBUNa 2 × 256 mg, Advil(®) FastGel(®) (IBUFG) 2 × 200 mg, Nurofen(®) (IBUNur) 2 × 200 mg, Advil(®) (IBUAdv) 2 × 200 mg, and Nurofen(®) Express containing IBU lysinate (IBULys) 2 × 342 mg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Log-transformed area under the plasma concentration versus time curve to last observable concentration (AUCL) and maximum plasma concentration (C max) were the primary pharmacokinetic parameters; time to maximum measured plasma concentration (T max) was analyzed post hoc. RESULTS: IBUNa was bioequivalent to IBULG (fasted and fed) and IBUFG and IBULys (fasted) for rate (C max) and extent (AUCL) of IBU absorption. After fasting, AUCL was bioequivalent for IBUNa and IBUMot, IBUAdv, and IBUNur, but C max occurred significantly earlier with IBUNa. After fasting, median IBUNa T max was comparable to that for IBULG, IBUFG, and IBULys, but was much shorter than that for IBUMot, IBUNur, and IBUAdv. Food slowed absorption of IBUNa and IBULG similarly. All treatments were tolerated similarly. CONCLUSION: IBUNa is absorbed faster but to a similar extent as standard IBU formulations.

An evaluation of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels in patients with acute toothaches: efficacy, tolerability and compliance with label dose administration directions.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels compared with those of a vehicle (placebo) gel for the temporary relief of toothache pain. They also assessed the compliance with the label dose administration directions on the part of participants with toothache pain. METHODS: Under double-masked conditions, 576 participants self-applied study gel to an open tooth cavity and surrounding oral tissues. Participants evaluated their pain intensity and pain relief for 120 minutes. The authors determined the amount of gel the participants applied. RESULTS: The responders' rates (the primary efficacy parameter), defined as the percentage of participants who had an improvement in pain intensity as exhibited by a pain score reduction of at least one unit on the dental pain scale from baseline for two consecutive assessments any time between the five- and 20-minute points, were 87.3 percent, 80.7 percent and 70.4 percent, respectively, for 20 percent benzocaine gel, 10 percent benzocaine gel and vehicle gel. Both benzocaine gels were significantly (P ≤ .05) better than vehicle gel; the 20 percent benzocaine gel also was significantly (P ≤ .05) better than the 10 percent benzocaine gel. The mean amount of gel applied was 235.6 milligrams, with 88.2 percent of participants applying 400 mg or less. CONCLUSIONS: Both 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels were more efficacious than the vehicle gel, and the 20 percent benzocaine gel was more efficacious than the 10 percent benzocaine gel. All treatments were well tolerated by participants. Practical Implications. Patients can use 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels to temporarily treat toothache pain safely.

Effects of genetic fusion of factor IX to albumin on in vivo clearance in mice and rabbits.

Individuals with haemophilia B require replacement therapy with recombinant or plasma-derived coagulation factor IX (fIX). More benefit per injected dose might be obtained if fIX clearance could be slowed. The contribution of overall size to fIX clearance was explored, using genetic fusion to albumin. Recombinant murine fIX (MIX), and three proteins with C-terminal epitope tags were expressed in HEK 293 cells: tagged MIX (MIXT), tagged mouse serum albumin (MSAT) and MFUST, in which MIX and MSAT were fused in a single polypeptide chain. Proteins MFUST and MIXT were two- to threefold less active in clotting assays than MIX. In mice, the area under the clearance curve (AUC) was reduced for MFUST compared with MSAT or plasma-derived MSA (pd-MSA); the terminal catabolic half-life (t(0.5)) did not differ amongst the three proteins. Two minutes after injection, >40% of the injected MFUST was found in the liver, compared with <10% of either MSAT or pd-MSA. In rabbits, the AUC for MFUST was reduced compared to MIXT, MSAT, or pd-MSA, while the t(0.5) of the fusion protein fell between that of MIXT and MSAT or pd-MSA. Similar results were obtained with non-radioactive fused or non-fused recombinant human fIX in fIX knockout mice. The clearance behaviour of the fusion protein thus more closely resembled that of fIX than that of albumin despite a modest increase in terminal half-life, suggesting that fIX-specific interactions that are important in determining clearance were maintained in spite of the increased size of the fusion protein.