ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Angiogenesis plays a key role in glioblastoma, but most anti-angiogenic therapy trials have failed to change the poor outcome of this disease. Despite this, and because bevacizumab is known to alleviate symptoms, it is used in daily practice. We aimed to assess the real-life benefit in terms of overall survival, time to treatment failure, objective response, and clinical benefit in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. METHODS: This was a monocentric, retrospective study including patients treated between 2006 and 2016 in our institution. RESULTS: 202 patients were included. The median duration of bevacizumab treatment was 6 months. Median time to treatment failure was 6.8 months (95%CI 5.3-8.2) and median overall survival was 23.7 months (95%CI 20.6-26.8). Fifty percent of patients had a radiological response at first MRI evaluation, and 56% experienced symptom amelioration. Grade 1/2 hypertension (n = 34, 17%) and grade one proteinuria (n = 20, 10%) were the most common side effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a clinical benefit and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. As the panel of therapies is still very limited for these tumors, this work supports the use of bevacizumab as a therapeutic option.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Humans , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Medical Futility , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/chemically induced , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cetuximab is crucial in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck of patients. Grade 3-4 cetuximab-induced infusion reactions (CI-IRs) occur in 2% of patients with colorectal cancer. Despite the 2.7% CI-IR rate in the EXTREME trial, higher rates were reported in small series of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (6%-18%). There is an urgent need to better appraise the natural history and the predictive factors for CI-IRs in patients with HNSCC exposed to cetuximab. METHODS: The medical records from patients with HNSCC (n=428) treated by cetuximab at Gustave Roussy from January 2013 to December 2015 were reviewed. The impact of potential risk factors was analysed. RESULTS: Out of 428 patients, 24 patients (5.4%) presented CI-IR, including grade 3-4 (95.7%); about 21% (5/24) requiring intensive care unit referral and quasi all occurred within the first cycle (21/24). In a multivariate analysis, the occurrence of grade 3-4 CI-IR was associated with tobacco and alcohol history (p=8.5e-3) and with prior allergy history (p=2.9e-3). CI-IRs tended to be associated with poor overall survival in patients with recurrent and metastatic HNSCC and with a higher number of further lines of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In real life, CI-IRs appear far more common in patients with HNSCC (5.4%) than reported in prospective trials. This is the largest series of patients ever focusing on the risk of CI-IR in patients with HNSCC. Prior allergy history and tobacco history are associated with CI-IR and could be used to better allocate treatment. Further prospective data are required to confirm these findings.
