A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Efficacy Study of a Prime Boost Therapeutic Vaccination Strategy in HIV-1-Infected Individuals: VRI02 ANRS 149 LIGHT Phase II Trial.

In this placebo-controlled phase II randomized clinical trial, 103 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients under cART (combined antiretroviral treatment) were randomized 2:1 to receive either 3 doses of DNA GTU-MultiHIV B (coding for Rev, Nef, Tat, Gag, and gp160) at week 0 (W0), W4, and W12, followed by 2 doses of LIPO-5 vaccine containing long peptides from Gag, Pol, and Nef at W20 and W24, or placebo. Analytical treatment interruption (ATI) was performed between W36 to W48. At W28, vaccinees experienced an increase in functional CD4+ T-cell responses (P < 0.001 for each cytokine compared to W0) measured, predominantly against Gag and Pol/Env, and an increase in HIV-specific CD8+ T cells producing interleukin 2 (IL-2) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (P = 0.001 and 0.013, respectively), predominantly against Pol/Env and Nef. However, analysis of T-cell subsets by mass cytometry in a subpopulation showed an increase in the W28/W0 ratio for memory CD8+ T cells coexpressing exhaustion and senescence markers such as PD-1/TIGIT (P = 0.004) and CD27/CD57 (P = 0.044) in vaccinees compared to the placebo group. During ATI, all patients experienced viral rebound, with the maximum observed HIV RNA level at W42 (median, 4.63 log10 copies [cp]/ml; interquartile range [IQR], 4.00 to 5.09), without any difference between arms. No patient resumed cART for CD4 cell count drop. Globally, the vaccine strategy was safe. However, a secondary HIV transmission during ATI was observed. These data show that the prime-boost combination of DNA and LIPO-5 vaccines elicited broad and polyfunctional T cells. The contrast between the quality of immune responses and the lack of potent viral control underscores the need for combined immunomodulatory strategies. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01492985.)IMPORTANCE In this placebo-controlled phase II randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a therapeutic prime-boost vaccine strategy using a recombinant DNA vaccine (GTU-MultiHIV B clade) followed by a boost vaccination with a lipopeptide vaccine (HIV-LIPO-5) in HIV-infected patients on combined antiretroviral therapy. We show here that this prime-boost strategy is well tolerated, consistently with previous studies in HIV-1-infected individuals and healthy volunteers who received each vaccine component individually. Compared to the placebo group, vaccinees elicited strong and polyfunctional HIV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses. However, these immune responses presented some qualitative defects and were not able to control viremia following antiretroviral treatment interruption, as no difference in HIV viral rebound was observed in the vaccine and placebo groups. Several lessons were learned from these results, pointing out the urgent need to combine vaccine strategies with other immune-based interventions.

Radiography of scoliosis: Comparative dose levels and image quality between a dynamic flat-panel detector and a slot-scanning device (EOS system).

PURPOSE: To compare radiation dose and image quality between a slot-scanning system (SSS) and a dynamic flat-panel detector (DFD) in assessing scoliosis in children. METHODS: An experimental study was first performed with a phantom to assess the quality of each device. The clinical part included a prospective observational dosimetric and qualitative comparative study with acquisition of whole-spine X-ray: SSS (31 children), DFD (26 children). Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Dosimetric statistical analysis was performed from dose area product (DAP) and entrance skin dose measured by thermo-luminescent dosimeters localized in the cervical, thoracic and sacral areas. Assessment of the diagnostic quality (phantom and clinical) was realized by independent evaluation by 3 observers, using statistical analysis of quality score and inter-observer reproducibility. RESULTS: DAP was equivalent with the 2 systems. Entrance skin dose was significantly higher with DFD in thoracic and pelvic regions (P<0.05). Image quality scores of the SSS were significantly better than DFD for a majority of criteria, in both phantom and clinical evaluations. CONCLUSION: For scoliosis evaluation, the SSS, compared to the DFD system, offers enhanced image quality while reducing the entrance skin dose in the most radiosensitive areas.