Efficacy of Whole-Blood Exchange Transfusion in Refractory Severe Autoimmune Haemolytic Anaemia Secondary to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Real-World Observational Retrospective Study.

Background: Severe autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients could be life-threatening and formidable, especially in those nonresponsive to glucocorticoids (GCs) and immunosuppressants (ISAs). Whole-blood exchange transfusion (WBE), with plasma exchange and pathogenic cell removal as well as healthy red blood cell transfusion, could be beneficial. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of WBE in combination with GCs/ISAs. Methods: In this retrospective study, the clinical data of 22 refractory severe SLE-AIHA inpatients between February 2016 and February 2021 were collected and analysed, among whom 14 patients had received WBE and were compared with those treated with typical second-line therapy of intravenous immunoglobulin and/or rituximab (IVIG/RTX). Results: Among the 22 severe refractory SLE-AIHA patients, eight patients received IVIG and/or RTX without WBE (group 1, IVIG/RTX, n = 8), seven patients were given WBE without IVIG/RTX (group 2, WBE alone, n = 7), and seven patients who failed initial IVIG/RTX therapy were given sequential WBE therapy (group 3 IVIG/RTX→WBE, n = 7). Fourteen patients had accepted WBE treatment regardless of prior IVIG/RTX usage (group 2 + 3, WBE ± IVIG/RTX, n = 14). On days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after corresponding therapies, patients of groups 2, 3, and 2 + 3 showed significantly higher levels of haemoglobin (Hb) than patients of group 1. Compared with patients of group 1, patients of groups 2, 3, and 2 + 3 took less time to reach and maintain Hb ≥60 g/L from baseline. Groups 2 and 2 + 3 consumed a lower dose of GCs than group 1 to reach and maintain Hb ≥60 g/L from baseline. Group 1 experienced longer hospital stays than group 2, and group 3's cost of hospitalisation is more than groups 1 and 2. Hbmin <40 g/L may be a key indicative factor for initiating WBE remedy therapy as IVIG/RTX may not be effective enough in 48-72 h in those patients with refractory severe SLE-AIHA. No severe adverse effects were observed in the WBE group. Conclusions: WBE could be a safe and beneficial alternative therapy for refractory severe SLE-AIHA.

Prevalence of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus and Treponema pallidum infections in hospitalized patients before transfusion in Xiangya hospital Central South University, China from 2011 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Treponema pallidum (TP) infections are considered classic transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs). Few data are available about the prevalence of TTIs in patients before blood transfusion in China. This study aimed to investigate the seroprevalence of four TTIs among patients before blood transfusion in Xiangya Hospital Central South University, China. METHODS: From 2011 to 2016, 442,121 hospitalized patients before possible blood transfusion were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HCV, syphilis antibody (anti-TP) and anti-HIV. RESULTS: Of the 442,121 patients, the overall positivity of the four TTI serum markers was 15.35%. The positive rates of HBsAg, anti-HCV, anti-HIV and anti-TP were 10.98, 1.43, 0.16 and 2.78%, respectively. TTI serum markers showed a significant difference by gender, with positive rates of 17.98% for males and 12.79% for females. The prevalence of TTI serum markers varied significantly by age. The overall co-infection rate was 0.63%, and the top three multiple infections were HBV-TP, HBV-HCV, and HCV-TP. The co-infection rates of HBV-TP and HBV-HCV showed a significant decrease from 2011 to 2016, while the rates of other co-infections remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of TTIs in patients before blood transfusion is much higher compared to that in blood donors in the region. The infection rates of HIV and TP increased, and the infection rate of HBsAg decreased in recent years.

Retrospective analysis of 30 severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia patients treated by whole blood exchange transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) results from the excessive destruction of red blood cells (RBCs). Nowadays, there is no exact treatment for severe AIHA and our current medical therapies do not effectively stop the progression of severe AIHA. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is used as emergency therapy that is sometimes helpful. Whole blood exchange (WBE) is based on TPE while its replacement liquids are donor RBCs and fresh plasma. We hypothesized that WBE transfusion might be able to control the process of acute hemolysis, avoid the hemolytic crisis, and improve severe hemolytic anemic symptoms rapidly. The objective was to investigate the efficiency of WBE on severe AIHA. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty severe AIHA patients were treated with WBE in our hospital from June 2003 to August 2013. An apheresis instrument (COBE Spectra, TerumoBCT) was employed in WBE procedure. We retrospectively analyzed the results of these severe anemic patients. RESULTS: Twelve hours after WBE treatment, 26 of 30 (86.7%) patients' Hb levels were elevated immediately. Their total bilirubin concentration, direct bilirubin levels, and titers of antibodies were decreased, and clinical symptoms were relieved rapidly. Two (6.7%) patients' hemolysis was stopped from deteriorating, one (3.3%) patient's hemolysis was not controlled by the treatment due to malignancy, and another (3.3%) patient died from pleural hemorrhage of Evans syndrome. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that WBE is an effective therapy for severe AIHA. Further investigation of this application is warranted.

Exchange transfusion of least incompatible blood for severe hemolytic disease of the newborn due to anti-Rh17.

HDN attributed to the rare Rh variants has become more and more significant caused by anti-D, but the compatible blood is usually very difficult to obtain when exchange transfusion is required. We treated a 10-hour neonate of O, D + C + c - E - e+ blood group with severe HDN due to anti-Rh17 with least incompatible blood typed O, D + C - c + E + e-. The neonatal hemolysis was relieved obviously and bilirubin was reduced gradually after exchange transfusion. The infant was discharged in good health 13 days after birth with 135.0 g/L, 28.0 micromol/L and 10.7 micromol/L of Hb, total bilirubin and direct bilirubin, respectively. No sequelae were observed in a three-year follow-up. The result suggesting that the least incompatible blood is an alternative choice for exchange transfusion in severe HDN due to anti-Rh17 in case that Rh17 antigen-negative blood is unavailable.

[Clinical significance of anti-D IgG screening and titer detection in 286 RhD negative pregnant women].

OBJECTIVE: Anti-D IgG in RhD negative pregnant women is the main antibody of Rh-induced hemolytic disease of newborn (HDN). The study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of anti-D IgG screening and titer detection in RhD negative pregnant women. METHODS: Sera of 286 RhD negative pregnant women were collected. Microtube column indirect antiglobulin test was used to screen and identify anti-D IgG. The indirect antiglobulin test was used to test the titer of anti-D IgG. RESULTS: Anti-D IgG was identified in 21 cases (7.3%). The titer of anti-D showed an increasing trend with pregnancy progresses. The clinical outcomes of 12 fetuses (newborns) from positive anti-D pregnant women were observed. Two cases died in utero, 2 cases did not show abnormality and 8 cases had hemolysis. The 8 cases with hemolysis were treated with exchange transfusion or blood transfusion, and they had a good prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The screening and titer detection of anti-D IgG in RhD negative pregnant women are valuable in the prediction and treatment of HDN.

[Lymphoplasmapheresis for Guillain-Barre syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effect and security of lymphoplasmapheresis (LPE) for Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). METHODS: Sixty-six GBS patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: the therapy group (33 patients) were treated with LPE in addition to the medical treatment; the control group (33 patients) only accepted the medical treatment. The therapeutic effect was evaluated with the initial recovery time of myodynamia and the myodynamia score difference, and the side effect of the therapy group was observed. RESULTS: The therapy group were treated with LPE for 48 times,1.5 times per person. The average initial recovery time was quicker in the therapy group compared with that in the control group [(6.45+/-3.01) vs (8.36+/-3.83) days]. The difference of limb myodynamia score between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the therapy group was more than that in the control group. The improved number in the therapy group was more than that in the control group, but the ineffective number in the therapy group was not as many as that in the control group. The total effective rate in the therapy group was higher than that in the control group (51.5% vs 27.7%); the average hospital day in the therapy group was shorter than that in the control group [(19.42+/-7.25) vs (24.00+/-8.64) days]; and the difference had statistical significance(P<0.05). The average myodynamia score after the first LPE increased, but the difference had no statistical significance (P>0.05). After the second and the third LPE, the average myodynamia score continued to rise, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). The incidence rate of side effects in the therapy group was 12.5%. Urticaria and hypotension were the major side effects, but they were light and could be relieved by symptomatic treatment. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic effect of LPE is definite, and the side effect is scarce. LPE is safe and effective, and it is worth of generalization and applying in clinical practice.