Short-term efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in SCA3: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is the most common autosomal dominant ataxia globally. No effective treatment is currently available for SCA3. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive form of brain stimulation, demonstrated to improve symptoms in patients with neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias. The present study investigated whether treatment with rTMS over the cerebellum for 15 consecutive days improved measures of ataxia in SCA3 patients. METHODS: A double-blind, prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trial was carried out on 44 SCA3 patients. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: real or sham stimulation. Each participant underwent 30 minutes of 1Hz rTMS stimulation (a total of 900 pulses) for 15 consecutive days. The primary outcome measure was the score on the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS), and secondary outcomes were from the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). RESULTS: Nausea was the only adverse effect reported by 2 participants from the sham and real group. After 15 days of treatment, there was a significant improvement in all performance scores in both real and sham stimulation groups. However, compared to the sham group, the improvements were significantly larger in the real group for the ICARS (P = 0.002), SARA (P = 0.001), and BBS (P = 0.001). INTERPRETATION: A 15 days treatment with rTMS over the cerebellum improves the symptoms of ataxia in SCA3 patients. Our results suggest that rTMS is a promising tool for future rehabilitative approaches in SCA3.

Quantitative assessment of postural instability in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is one of the most common hereditary neurodegenerative diseases, with balance instability as main symptom. Balance quantification is crucial for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. However, balance evaluation in SCA3 is often subject to bias. Here, we aimed to quantitatively evaluate postural instability and investigate the relationship between postural instability and clinical characteristics in SCA3 patients. METHODS: Sixty-two SCA3 patients and 62 normal controls were recruited, and their postural balance was measured using a posturographic platform. Principal component analysis was performed as data reduction to identify postural instability factors. Multivariable linear regression was used to investigate potential risk factors for postural instability and to explore whether postural instability predicts the severity and progression of ataxia in SCA3 patients. RESULTS: We found SCA3 patients experience postural instability characterized by significant impairment in static and dynamic stability. The condition without visual feedback was the most sensitive measure in differentiating SCA3 from controls. Regression analyses revealed that ataxia severity predicted both static (P = 0.014) and dynamic stability (P = 0.001). Likewise, along with expanded CAG repeats (P < 0.001), both static (P < 0.001) and dynamic stability (P < 0.001) predicted ataxia severity, but not ataxia progression. INTERPRETATION: Our findings demonstrate the validity of using the Pro-kin system for assessing postural instability in SCA3 patients. This type of quantitative assessment of balance dysfunction can contribute to clinical trials and balance rehabilitation in SCA3 patients.