Drug-Related Deaths in China: An Analysis of a Spontaneous Reporting System.

Background: Adverse drug reactions with an outcome of death represent the most serious consequences and are inherently important for pharmacovigilance. The nature and characteristics of drug-related deaths are to a large extent unknown in the Chinese population. This study aims to characterize drug-related deaths by analysis of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) with an outcome of death in China. Methods: The characteristics of death ICSRs were analyzed by descriptive statistics of a large multi-provincial pharmacovigilance database in China. Results: There were 1,731 ICSRs with an outcome of death, representing 0.95% of all serious cases and 0.05% of all reported ICSRs. Most death ICSRs (78.57%) were reported by medical institutions. Only 16.00% of death ICSRs were reported by manufacturers or distributors. The reporting rate of death ICSRs in the age group of 0-4 years was significantly higher than patients aged 5-64 years. Patients aged over 64 years had the highest reporting rate of death ICSRs. Male patients generally had a higher reporting rate of death ICSRs than female patients. However, the reporting rate of female patients exceeded that of male patients in the age group of 20-34 years. Among 3,861 drugs implicated, ceftriaxone sodium with 146 (3.78%) records of death ranked first. Dexamethasone with 131 (3.39%) records of death ranked second. Qingkailing, an injectable traditional Chinese medicine with 75 (1.94%) records of death, ranked the fifth most frequently implicated medicine. Conclusion: Young children and elderly patients have a higher risk of drug-related deaths than patients aged 5-64 years. Female patients generally have a lower risk of drug-related deaths than male patients. However, female patients of reproductive age (aged 20-34 years) have a higher risk of drug-related deaths than male patients, hinting that physiological changes and drug uses for child bearing, giving birth, or birth control may significantly increase the risk of death for female patients aged 20-34 years. This paper suggests more research on the safe use of drugs for young children, elderly patients, and female patients of reproductive ages. Pharmacovigilance databases can be valuable resources for comprehensive understanding of drug-related problems.

Gaining insight into irrational off-label use of vidarabine through analysis of a spontaneous reporting system in China.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Although superseded by other antiviral agents in many Western countries, vidarabine is still widely used in some countries, including China; hence, the extent and appropriateness of vidarabine prescriptions in children require better characterization. This study examined the rationale, extent, and health risks associated with irrational off-label vidarabine use in China. METHODS: Data used in the study were extracted from a multi-provincial joint adverse drug reactions monitoring platform from 2002 to 2018. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the characteristics of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) related to vidarabine use. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among 2772 individual ICSRs related to vidarabine, 2223 (80.19%) cases occurred in patients aged 0-9. In all patients, the median age and interquartile range were 2 (0-6). Although most adverse events were mild, five deaths were recorded, all in children below 7 years of age. Paediatric use is the most prominent off-label use of vidarabine. Additionally, several other irrational off-label uses were identified, including 218 (7.86%) cases of overdosing and numerous applications beyond the approved indications, dosages, routes of administration, and solvents. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Data indicate that vidarabine was mainly prescribed for suspected common viral infections in paediatric patients, demonstrating serious inappropriate off-label uses. The problem was further complicated by the lack of sufficient information regarding safety, efficacy, and dosing regimens in children, as well as by several additional risk factors such as inappropriate solvents, routes of administration, and overdose. In the case of children, the physicians' lack of understanding of antiviral activities and compassionate prescriptions were mainly responsible for drug overuse. The health risks associated with the paediatric use of vidarabine in China require greater attention and further investigation.

Safety profile of traditional Chinese herbal injection: An analysis of a spontaneous reporting system in China.

PURPOSE: Although a series of serious adverse events have continually raised concerns about the potential toxicity of traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCM injections), studies on this subject are still sparse. We conducted a descriptive analysis of a spontaneous reporting system in China to describe the safety profile of TCM injections. METHODS: The safety profile of TCM injections is described by descriptive analysis of 559 066 adverse reports collected from Guangdong Provincial Center for adverse drug reaction (ADR) Monitoring in China during 2003 to 2017. RESULTS: The percentage of new or serious ADRs of TCM injections is much higher than average percentage of China's spontaneous reporting system (SRS) as a whole (48.70% vs <25%). Compared with conventional injections, TCM injections have a slightly lower percentage of serious ADRs (6.02% vs 6.72%) and much higher percentage of unknown (new) ADRs (46.74% vs 24.13%). The gender and age distribution for TCM injections are similar to conventional injections. The reporting rates of ADRs increased with age. Anaphylactic shock and anaphylactoid reaction are high-risk ADRs for TCM injections and, anaphylactic shock is ranked number 1 in causing deaths (50.00%). CONCLUSIONS: There are some differences and similarities on the safety profile between TCM injections and conventional injections. TCM injections have higher risk of adverse effects than any other dosage forms of TCM medications and higher percentage of new or serious adverse effects than conventional injections. A lot of work need to be done to clarify the huge amount of potential unknown adverse effects related to TCM injections.

Traditional Chinese herbal injection: Current status and future perspectives.

Traditional Chinese herbal injection, frequently referred to as TCM injection, has evolved over 70 years as a treatment modality that parallels injections of pharmaceutical products. As the market reach has not been analyzed systematically in the past literature this article performed a descriptive analysis of various aspects of TCM injections based on the following data sources: (1) information retrieved from website of drug registration system of China, and (2) regulatory documents, annual reports and ADR Information Bulletins issued by drug regulatory authority. As of December 31, 2017, 134 generic names of TCM injections from 224 manufacturers were approved for sale. Only 5 of the 134 TCM injections are documented in the present version of Ch.P (2015). Most TCM injections are documented in drug standards other than Ch.P. The formulation, ingredients and routes of administration of TCM injections are more complex than conventional chemical injections. Ten TCM injections are covered by national lists of essential medicine and 58 are covered by China's basic insurance program (2017). ADR reports related to TCM injections accounts for >50% of all ADR reports related to TCMs and the percentages have been rising annually. Making traditional medicine injectable might be a promising way to develop traditional medicines. However, many practical challenges need to be overcome by further development before a brighter future for injectable traditional medicines can reasonably be expected.

Active pharmacovigilance in China: recent development and future perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of active pharmacovigilance depends on the specific methods adopted and the work patterns put into place. Over the past few years, much attention has been paid to the importance of implementing such systems in China. However, less has been done to evaluate the state of implementation and future needs of such systems. METHODS: This paper reviews China's recent approaches to active pharmacovigilance by examining: (1) information collected from scientific articles and the websites of the China Food and Drug Administration and the China National Center for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring, (2) information available on China's spontaneous reporting systems (SRS) and active pharmacovigilance system, and (3) annual reports and internal reports on this subject. RESULTS: Areas that improved most meaningfully for China's active pharmacovigilance in recent years appear to include: (1) quicker reporting and more intelligent scanning methods for adverse drug reactions (ADRs), (2) the use of pharmacovigilance approaches to mine electronic hospital records, and (3) the development of integrated systems including the China Hospital Pharmacovigilance System and China Sentinel Hospital Alliance Program. CONCLUSION: Not only has the national online SRS system provided a platform for passive pharmacovigilance, it has also become an important platform for various explorations of active pharmacovigilance in China. Quick reporting and intelligent scanning of ADRs, facilitated by automated ADR detection based on electronic hospital records, have accelerated to capabilities for active pharmacovigilance. The outcomes of the programs, such as the China Hospital Pharmacovigilance System and China Sentinel Hospital Alliance Program, usher in a new era for China's active pharmacovigilance. These are particularly important to bridge the information system of sentinel hospitals and ADR research centers, but gaps remain. Thus, much work needs to be done before a high-level active pharmacovigilance system is sufficiently mature to ensure drug safety in the country.

Association between Concomitant Use of Acyclovir or Valacyclovir with NSAIDs and an Increased Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: Data Mining of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are likely to be used concomitantly with acyclovir or valacyclovir in clinical practice, but the study on the safety of such combinations was seldom reported. The objective of the study was to investigate reports of acute kidney injury (AKI) events associated with the concomitant use of oral acyclovir or valacyclovir with an NSAID by using the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) database between January 2004 and June 2012. The frequency of AKI events in patients while simultaneously taking either acyclovir or valacyclovir and an NSAID was compared using the Chi-square test. The effect of concomitant use of acyclovir or valacyclovir and individual NSAIDs on AKI was analyzed by the reporting odds ratio (ROR). The results showed that AKI was reported as the adverse event in 8.6% of the 10923 patients taking valacyclovir compared with 8.7% of the 2556 patients taking acyclovir (p=NS). However, AKI was significantly more frequently reported in patients simultaneously taking valacyclovir and an NSAID (19.4%) than in patients simultaneously taking acyclovir and an NSAID (10.5%) (p<0.01). The results also suggested that increased risk of AKI was likely associated with the concomitant use of valacyclovir and some NSAIDs such as loxoprofen, diclofenac, etodolac, ketorolac, piroxicam or lornoxicam. The case series from the AERS indicated that compared with acyclovir, valacyclovir is more likely to be affected by NSAIDs, and the concomitant use of valacyclovir with some NSAIDs might be associated with increased risk of AKI. The drug interactions with this specific combination of medications are worth exploring further.

Detecting drug-herbal interaction using a spontaneous reporting system database: an example with benzylpenicillin and qingkailing injection.

PURPOSE: The study aims to quantify anaphylaxis signal for combined exposure of benzylpenicilin and qingkailing injection (QI) compared with individual exposure of the two drugs and the background risk based on all other exposures in SRS database. METHODS: Data used in this study were collected during 2003-2014 from China Guangdong Provincial Center of ADR Monitoring. We studied the suspected ADR reports using a case/non-case design. The cases were defined as the reactions coded by WHO-preferred terms of anaphylactic shock or anaphylactoid reaction. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were used as a measure of disproportionality and were adjusted for age and gender to reduce confounding effects. An observed-to-expected ratio Ω was also used for interaction detection. RESULTS: The crude RORs (95 % CIs) for anaphylaxis in patients who used only benzylpenicillin or QI and those who used the two drugs concomitantly compared with patients who used neither of the two drugs were 2.50 (2.34-2.68), 1.59 (1.46-1.73), and 6.22 (3.34-11.58), respectively. The adjusted RORs (95 % CIs) were 2.48 (2.31-2.65), 1.54 (1.41-1.67), and 6.01 (3.22-11.20), respectively, after being adjusted for age and gender. The measured Ω, Ω0, Ω025, and Ω975 was 1.03, 1.09, 0.14, and 1.71, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Case reports in the database are suggestive of a safety signal which indicates that an interaction between benzylpenicillin and QI resulting in excess risk of anaphylaxis may occur. SRS databases have a potential for signaling unknown drug-herbal interactions. More effort is needed to expand this potential.