Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Microbiol ; 15: 1343511, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450171

ABSTRACT

Introduction: It is well-known that different populations and animals, even experimental animals with the same rearing conditions, differ in their susceptibility to obesity. The disparity in gut microbiota could potentially account for the variation in susceptibility to obesity. However, the precise impact of gut microbiota on gut metabolites and its subsequent influence on susceptibility to obesity remains uncertain. Methods: In this study, we established obesity-prone (OP) and obesity-resistant (OR) mouse models by High Fat Diet (HFD). Fecal contents of cecum were examined using 16S rDNA sequencing and untargeted metabolomics. Correlation analysis and MIMOSA2 analysis were used to explore the association between gut microbiota and intestinal metabolites. Results: After a HFD, gut microbiota and gut metabolic profiles were significantly different between OP and OR mice. Gut microbiota after a HFD may lead to changes in eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a variety of branched fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids (FAHFAs) and a variety of phospholipids to promote obesity. The bacteria g_Akkermansia (Greengene ID: 175696) may contribute to the difference in obesity susceptibility through the synthesis of glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase (glpQ) to promote choline production and the synthesis of valyl-tRNA synthetase (VARS) which promotes L-Valine degradation. In addition, gut microbiota may affect obesity and obesity susceptibility through histidine metabolism, linoleic acid metabolism and protein digestion and absorption pathways.

2.
ACS Omega ; 7(49): 44620-44630, 2022 Dec 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36530248

ABSTRACT

The huge energy penalty of CO2 desorption is the greatest challenge impeding the commercial application of amine-based CO2 capture. To deal with this problem, a series of metal oxide and oxyhydroxide catalysts were synthesized in this study to kinetically facilitate the CO2 desorption from 5.0 M monoethanolamine (MEA). The effects of selected catalysts on CO2 absorption kinetics, CO2 absorption capacity, CO2 reaction enthalpy, and desorption duty reduction of 2.0 M MEA were investigated by a true heat flow reaction calorimeter to access the practical feasibility of the catalytic CO2 desorption. The kinetic study of catalytic CO2 desorption was also carried out. CO2 desorption chemistry, catalyst characterization, and structure-function relationships were investigated to reveal the underlying mechanisms. Results show that addition of the catalyst had slight effects on the CO2 absorption kinetics and CO2 reaction enthalpy of MEA. In contrast, the CO2 desorption efficiency greatly increased from 28% in reference MEA to 52% in ZrO(OH)2-aided MEA. Compared to the benchmark catalyst HZSM-5, ZrO(OH)2 exhibited a 13% improvement in CO2 desorption efficiency. More importantly, compared to the reference MEA, the CO2 desorption duties of ZrO(OH)2 and FeOOH-aided MEA significantly reduced by 45 and 47% respectively, which are better than those of most other reported catalysts. The large surface area, pore volume, pore diameter, and amount of surface hydroxyl groups of ZrO(OH)2 and FeOOH afforded the catalytic performance by promoting the adsorption of alkaline speciation (e.g., MEA and HCO3 -) onto the particle surface.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...