Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
J Surg Res ; 295: 158-167, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38016269

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) may benefit pediatric healthcare, but it also raises ethical and pragmatic questions. Parental support is important for the advancement of AI in pediatric medicine. However, there is little literature describing parental attitudes toward AI in pediatric healthcare, and existing studies do not represent parents of hospitalized children well. METHODS: We administered the Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Healthcare, a validated survey, to parents of hospitalized children in a single tertiary children's hospital. Surveys were administered by trained study personnel (11/2/2021-5/1/2022). Demographic data were collected. An Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Healthcare score, assessing openness toward AI-assisted medicine, was calculated for seven areas of concern. Subgroup analyses were conducted using Mann-Whitney U tests to assess the effect of race, gender, education, insurance, length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission on AI use. RESULTS: We approached 90 parents and conducted 76 surveys for a response rate of 84%. Overall, parents were open to the use of AI in pediatric medicine. Social justice, convenience, privacy, and shared decision-making were important concerns. Parents of children admitted to an ICU expressed the most significantly different attitudes compared to parents of children not admitted to an ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Parents were overall supportive of AI-assisted healthcare decision-making. In particular, parents of children admitted to ICU have significantly different attitudes, and further study is needed to characterize these differences. Parents value transparency and disclosure pathways should be developed to support this expectation.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Child, Hospitalized , Humans , Child , Attitude , Intensive Care Units , Parents
2.
J Biomed Inform ; 147: 104531, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884177

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and predictive analytics, has shown great promise in health care. Despite its strong potential, there has been limited use in health care settings. In this systematic review, we aim to determine the main barriers to successful implementation of AI in healthcare and discuss potential ways to overcome these challenges. METHODS: We conducted a literature search in PubMed (1/1/2001-1/1/2023). The search was restricted to publications in the English language, and human study subjects. We excluded articles that did not discuss AI, machine learning, predictive analytics, and barriers to the use of these techniques in health care. Using grounded theory methodology, we abstracted concepts to identify major barriers to AI use in medicine. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2,382 articles. After reviewing the 306 included papers, we developed 19 major themes, which we categorized into three levels: the Technical/Algorithm, Stakeholder, and Social levels (TASS). These themes included: Lack of Explainability, Need for Validation Protocols, Need for Standards for Interoperability, Need for Reporting Guidelines, Need for Standardization of Performance Metrics, Lack of Plan for Updating Algorithm, Job Loss, Skills Loss, Workflow Challenges, Loss of Patient Autonomy and Consent, Disturbing the Patient-Clinician Relationship, Lack of Trust in AI, Logistical Challenges, Lack of strategic plan, Lack of Cost-effectiveness Analysis and Proof of Efficacy, Privacy, Liability, Bias and Social Justice, and Education. CONCLUSION: We identified 19 major barriers to the use of AI in healthcare and categorized them into three levels: the Technical/Algorithm, Stakeholder, and Social levels (TASS). Future studies should expand on barriers in pediatric care and focus on developing clearly defined protocols to overcome these barriers.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Artificial Intelligence , Medicine , Benchmarking , Machine Learning
3.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 39(1): 237, 2023 Jul 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37477761

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site occurrences (SSO), including surgical site infection, dehiscence, and incisional hernia, are complications following laparotomy. SSO rates in premature neonates are poorly understood. We hypothesize that SSO rates are higher among extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants compared to very low birth weight (VLBW) infants and strive to determine the optimal abdominal closure method for these infants. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of infants < 1.5 kg (kg) undergoing laparotomy at two institutions from 1/1/2020 to 5/1/2022. Patients were grouped by weight and closure; SSO rates were computed and the association tested using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: We identified 59 patients and 104 total operations. At initial surgery, 37 patients weighed < 1 kg (ELBW); 22 patients weighed 1-1.5 kg (VLBW). Complication rate for ELBW was 6(16%) vs. 2(9%) in VLBW, but not significant (p = 0.45). More complications followed a single-layer compared to a two-layer closure (18 vs. 2), but not significant (p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: SSO rates are higher for ELBW infants undergoing laparotomy, and fewer complications follow two-layer closure. However, these findings did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are needed to identify modifiable factors to reduce postoperative complications in these infants.


Subject(s)
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing , Pregnancy Complications , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Female , Humans , Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight , Prospective Studies , Laparotomy/adverse effects , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/epidemiology , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/surgery , Birth Weight
4.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 23(1): 93, 2023 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37165369

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We propose a new deep learning model to identify unnecessary hemoglobin (Hgb) tests for patients admitted to the hospital, which can help reduce health risks and healthcare costs. METHODS: We collected internal patient data from a teaching hospital in Houston and external patient data from the MIMIC III database. The study used a conservative definition of unnecessary laboratory tests, which was defined as stable (i.e., stability) and below the lower normal bound (i.e., normality). Considering that machine learning models may yield less reliable results when trained on noisy inputs containing low-quality information, we estimated prediction confidence to assess the reliability of predicted outcomes. We adopted a "select and predict" design philosophy to maximize prediction performance by selectively considering samples with high prediction confidence for recommendations. Our model accommodated irregularly sampled observational data to make full use of variable correlations (i.e., with other laboratory test values) and temporal dependencies (i.e., previous laboratory tests performed within the same encounter) in selecting candidates for training and prediction. RESULTS: The proposed model demonstrated remarkable Hgb prediction performance, achieving a normality AUC of 95.89% and a Hgb stability AUC of 95.94%, while recommending a reduction of 9.91% of Hgb tests that were deemed unnecessary. Additionally, the model could generalize well to external patients admitted to another hospital. CONCLUSIONS: This study introduces a novel deep learning model with the potential to significantly reduce healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes by identifying unnecessary laboratory tests for hospitalized patients.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Machine Learning , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Hospitalization , Electronic Health Records
5.
Surgery ; 172(1): 212-218, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35279294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal abscess, the most common complication after perforated appendicitis, is associated with considerable economic burden. However, costs of intra-abdominal abscesses in children are unknown. We aimed to evaluate resource utilization and costs attributable to intra-abdominal abscess in pediatric perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed of children (<18 years) who underwent appendectomy for perforated appendicitis (2013-2019). Hospital costs incurred during the index admission and within 30 postoperative days were obtained from the hospital accounting system and inflated to 2019 USD. Generalized linear models were used to determine excess resource utilization and costs attributable to intra-abdominal abscess after adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Of 763 patients, 153 (20%) developed intra-abdominal abscesses. Eighty-one patients with intra-abdominal abscesses (53%) underwent percutaneous abscess drainage. Intra-abdominal abscess was independently associated with a nearly 8-fold increased risk of 30-day readmission (adjusted risk ratio, 7.8 [95% confidence interval, 4.7-13.0]). Patients who developed an intra-abdominal abscess required 6.1 excess hospital bed days compared to patients without intra-abdominal abscess (95% confidence interval, 5.3-7.0). Adjusted mean hospital costs for patients with intra-abdominal abscess totaled $27,394 (95% confidence interval, $25,688-$29,101) versus $15,586 (95% confidence interval, $15,102-$16,069) for patients without intra-abdominal abscess. Intra-abdominal abscess was associated with an incremental cost of $11,809 (95% confidence interval, $10,029-$13,588). Hospital room costs accounted for 66% of excess costs. CONCLUSION: Postoperative intra-abdominal abscess nearly doubled pediatric perforated appendicitis costs, primarily due to more hospital bed days and associated room costs. Intra-abdominal abscesses resulted in estimated excess costs of $1.8 million during the study period. Even small reductions in intra-abdominal abscess rates or hospital bed days could yield substantial health care savings.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Abscess , Appendicitis , Abdominal Abscess/etiology , Abdominal Abscess/surgery , Appendectomy/methods , Appendicitis/complications , Appendicitis/surgery , Child , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies
6.
Am J Med ; 135(6): 769-774, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35114179

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary laboratory tests contribute to iatrogenic harm and are a major source of waste in the health care system. We previously developed a machine learning algorithm to help clinicians identify unnecessary laboratory tests, but it has not been externally validated. In this study, we externally validate our machine learning algorithm. METHODS: To externally validate the machine learning algorithm that was originally trained on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database, we tested the algorithm in a separate institution. We identified and abstracted data for all patients older than 18 years admitted to the intensive care unit at Memorial Hermann Hospital in Houston, Texas (MHH) from January 1, 2020 to November 13, 2020. Using the transfer learning style, we performed external validation of the machine learning algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 651 MHH patients were included. The model performed well in predicting abnormality (area under the curve [AUC] 0.98 for MIMIC III and 0.89 for MHH). The model performed similarly in predicting transitions from normal laboratory range to abnormal (AUC 0.71 for MIMIC III and 0.70 for MHH). The performance of the model in predicting the actual laboratory value was also similar in the MIMIC III (accuracy 0.41) and MHH data (0.45). CONCLUSIONS: We externally validated the machine learning model and showed that the model performed similarly, supporting the generalizability to other settings. While this model demonstrated good performance for predicting abnormal labs and transitions, it does not perform well enough for prediction of laboratory values in most clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Machine Learning , Algorithms , Area Under Curve , Humans , Intensive Care Units
7.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(3): 469-473, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Comprehensive opioid stewardship programs require collective stakeholder alignment and proficiency. We aimed to determine opioid-related prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs among providers who care for pediatric surgical patients. METHODS: A single-center, cross-sectional survey was conducted of attending physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers (APPs), who managed pediatric surgical patients. RESULTS: Of 110 providers surveyed, 75% completed the survey. Over half of respondents (n = 43, 52%) reported always/very often prescribing opioids at discharge, with residents reporting the highest rate (66%). Provider types had varying prescribing patterns, including what types of opioids and non-opioids they prescribed. There was a lack of formal training, particularly among residents, of which only 42% reported receiving formal opioid prescribing education. Finally, although only 28% of providers felt that the opioid epidemic affects children, 48% believed pediatric providers' prescribing patterns contributed to the opioid epidemic as a whole, and 80% reported changing their prescribing practices in response. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability exists in opioid prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs among providers who care for pediatric surgical patients. Effective opioid stewardship requires comprehensive policies, pediatric specific guidelines, and education for all providers caring for children to align provider proficiency and optimize prescribing patterns.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Drug Prescriptions , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
J Pediatr Surg ; 56(7): 1099-1102, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853733

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Pain control is challenging after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). Cryoanalgesia, which temporarily ablates peripheral nerves, improves pain control and may accelerate post-operative recovery. We hypothesized that cryoanalgesia would be associated with shorter length of stay (LOS) in children undergoing MIRPE. METHODS: A matched cohort study was conducted of children (<18 years) who underwent MIRPE 2016-2018, using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Each patient who received cryoanalgesia during MIRPE was matched to four controls (no cryoanalgesia). Univariate and multilevel regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients who received cryoanalgesia during MIRPE were matched to 140 controls. Patients who received cryoanalgesia had a LOS reduction with similar secondary outcomes (operative time, rates of complication, reoperation, and readmission). On multilevel regression adjusted for matched groups, cryoanalgesia was associated with a 1.3-day reduction in LOS (95% CI -1.8 to -0.8, p < 0.001). On sensitivity analysis excluding patients with complications, cryoanalgesia remained associated with a LOS reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoanalgesia is a promising adjunct in the care of pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE. Utilization is associated with a shorter LOS without an increase in operative time or complications. Cryoanalgesia should be considered for inclusion in enhanced recovery strategies for patients undergoing MIRPE.


Subject(s)
Funnel Chest , Child , Cohort Studies , Funnel Chest/surgery , Humans , Length of Stay , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Pediatr Surg ; 56(7): 1113-1116, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33836846

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Repetitive painful stimuli and early exposure to opioids places neonates at risk for neurocognitive delays. We aimed to understand opioid utilization for neonates with gastroschisis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of infants with gastroschisis at a tertiary children's hospital (2017-2019). Multivariate linear regression was performed to analyze variations in opioid use. RESULTS: Among 30 patients with gastroschisis, 33% were managed by primary suture-less closure, 7% by primary sutured closure, 40% by spring silo, and 20% by handsewn silo. The proportion of pain medication used was: morphine (89%), acetaminophen (8%), and fentanyl (3%). Opioids were used for a median of 6.5 days (range 0-20) per patient. Median total opioid administered across all patients was 2.2 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/kg (IQR 0.7-3.3). Following definitive closure, median opioid use was 0.2 MME/kg (IQR 0.1-0.8). With multivariate regression, 45% of the variation in MME use was associated with the type of surgery after adjusting for weight, gestational age, and gender, p = 0.02. After definitive fascial closure, there was no significant variations in opioid use. CONCLUSION: There is a significant variation in the utilization of opioid, primarily prior to fascial closure. Understanding pain needs and standardization may improve opioid stewardship in infants with gastroschisis. 197/200 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Gastroschisis , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Child , Fentanyl , Gastroschisis/epidemiology , Gastroschisis/surgery , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Morphine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
10.
J Pediatr Surg ; 56(4): 727-732, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32709531

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Prophylactic, intraabdominal drains have been used to prevent intraabdominal abscess (IAA) after perforated appendicitis. We hypothesized that routine drain placement would reduce the IAA rate in pediatric perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A 27-month quality improvement (QI) initiative was conducted: closed-suction, intraabdominal drains were placed intraoperatively in pediatric (age < 18) perforated appendicitis patients. QI patients were compared to controls admitted during the preceding 8 months and following 4 months. The primary outcome was 30-day IAA rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy QI patients were compared to 109 controls. There was 100% compliance during 21 of 27 months of the QI initiative; only 7 QI patients did not receive drains. IAA occurred in 20.0% of QI patients and 22.9% of control (p = 0.52). After adjustment, the QI initiative was not associated with reduced odds of IAA (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.48-1.44). Median length of stay was longer in QI patients during the index admission (p = 0.03) and over 30 postoperative days (p = 0.03), but these relationships did not persist after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: A QI initiative investigating prophylactic, intraabdominal drain placement in perforated appendicitis did not reduce the IAA rate. We recommend against routine drain placement in pediatric perforated appendicitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Abscess , Appendicitis , Abdominal Abscess/etiology , Abdominal Abscess/prevention & control , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/surgery , Child , Humans , Length of Stay , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies
11.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 24(5): 975-980, 2017 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28340218

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Readmission following colorectal surgery, typically due to surgery-related complications, is common. Patient-centered discharge warnings may guide recognition of early complication signs after colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: User-centered design of a discharge warnings tool consisted of iterative health literacy review and a heuristic evaluation with human factors and clinical experts as well as patient end users to establish content validity and usability. RESULTS: Literacy evaluation of the prototype suggested >12th-grade reading level. Subsequent revisions reduced reading level to 8th grade or below. Contents were formatted during heuristic evaluation into 3 action-oriented zones (green, yellow, and red) with relevant warning lexicons. Usability testing demonstrated comprehension of this 3-level lexicon and recognition of appropriate patient actions to take for each level. DISCUSSION: We developed a discharge warnings tool for colorectal surgery using staged user-centered design. The lexicon of surgical discharge warnings could structure communication among patients, caregivers, and clinicians to improve post-discharge care.


Subject(s)
Audiovisual Aids , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Health Literacy , Patient Discharge , Patient Education as Topic , Colectomy , Colorectal Surgery , Colostomy , Humans , Patient Readmission
12.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(1): 23-30, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27342829

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Utilization of evidence-based treatments for patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRC-LM) outside high-volume centers is not well-characterized. We sought to describe trends in treatment and outcomes, and identify predictors of therapy within a nationwide integrated health system. METHODS: Observational cohort study of patients with CRC-LM treated within the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system (1998-2012). Secular trends and outcomes were compared on the basis of treatment type. Multivariate regression was used to identify predictors of no treatment (chemotherapy or surgery). RESULTS: Among 3270 patients, 57.3 % received treatment (chemotherapy and/or surgery) during the study period. The proportion receiving treatment doubled (38 % in 1998 vs. 68 % in 2012; trend test, p < 0.001), primarily driven by increased use of chemotherapy (26 vs. 57 %; trend test, p < 0.001). Among patients having surgery (16 %), the proportion having ablation (10 vs. 61.9 %; trend test, p < 0.001) and multimodality therapy (15 vs. 67 %; trend test, p < 0.001) increased significantly over time. Older patients [65-75 years: odds ratio (OR) 1.65, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.39-1.97; >75 years: OR 3.84, 95 % CI 3.13-4.69] and those with high comorbidity index (Charlson ≥3: OR 1.47, 95 % CI 1.16-1.85) were more likely to be untreated. Overall survival was significantly different based on treatment strategy (log-rank p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of CRC-LM patients receiving treatment within the largest integrated health system in the US (VA health system) has increased substantially over time; however, one in three patients still does not receive any treatment. Future initiatives should focus on increasing treatment among older patients as well as on evaluating reasons leading to the no-treatment approach and increased use of ablation procedures.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Hospitals, Veterans , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
13.
J Surg Res ; 206(1): 159-167, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27916356

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There have been many attempts to identify variables associated with ventral hernia recurrence; however, it is unclear which statistical modeling approach results in models with greatest internal and external validity. We aim to assess the predictive accuracy of models developed using five common variable selection strategies to determine variables associated with hernia recurrence. METHODS: Two multicenter ventral hernia databases were used. Database 1 was randomly split into "development" and "internal validation" cohorts. Database 2 was designated "external validation". The dependent variable for model development was hernia recurrence. Five variable selection strategies were used: (1) "clinical"-variables considered clinically relevant, (2) "selective stepwise"-all variables with a P value <0.20 were assessed in a step-backward model, (3) "liberal stepwise"-all variables were included and step-backward regression was performed, (4) "restrictive internal resampling," and (5) "liberal internal resampling." Variables were included with P < 0.05 for the Restrictive model and P < 0.10 for the Liberal model. A time-to-event analysis using Cox regression was performed using these strategies. The predictive accuracy of the developed models was tested on the internal and external validation cohorts using Harrell's C-statistic where C > 0.70 was considered "reasonable". RESULTS: The recurrence rate was 32.9% (n = 173/526; median/range follow-up, 20/1-58 mo) for the development cohort, 36.0% (n = 95/264, median/range follow-up 20/1-61 mo) for the internal validation cohort, and 12.7% (n = 155/1224, median/range follow-up 9/1-50 mo) for the external validation cohort. Internal validation demonstrated reasonable predictive accuracy (C-statistics = 0.772, 0.760, 0.767, 0.757, 0.763), while on external validation, predictive accuracy dipped precipitously (C-statistic = 0.561, 0.557, 0.562, 0.553, 0.560). CONCLUSIONS: Predictive accuracy was equally adequate on internal validation among models; however, on external validation, all five models failed to demonstrate utility. Future studies should report multiple variable selection techniques and demonstrate predictive accuracy on external data sets for model validation.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Hernia, Ventral/diagnosis , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Herniorrhaphy , Models, Statistical , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Recurrence , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Surg Res ; 201(2): 370-7, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020821

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Readmissions following colorectal surgery are common. However, there are limited data examining unplanned readmissions (URs) after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. The goal of this study was to identify reasons and predictors of UR, and to examine their clinical impact on CRC patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using a prospective CRC surgery database of patients treated at a VA tertiary referral center was performed (2005-2011). Ninety-day URs were recorded and classified based on reason for readmission. Clinical impact of UR was measured using a validated classification for postoperative complications. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of UR. RESULTS: 487 patients were included; 104 (21%) required UR. Although the majority of UR were due to surgical reasons (n = 72, 69%), medical complications contributed to 25% of all readmission events. Nearly half of UR (n = 44, 40%) had significant clinical implications requiring invasive interventions, intensive care unit stays, or led to death. After multivariate logistic regression, the following independent predictors of UR were identified: African-American race (odds ratio [OR] 0.47 [0.27-0.88]), ostomy creation (OR 2.50 [1.33-4.70]), and any postoperative complication (OR 4.36 [2.48-7.68]). CONCLUSIONS: Ninety-day URs following colorectal cancer surgery are common, and represent serious events associated with worse outcomes. In addition to postoperative complications, surgical details that can be anticipated (i.e., ileostomy creation) and medical events unrelated to surgery, both contribute as important and potentially preventable reasons for UR. Future studies should focus on developing and examining interventions focused at improving the process of perioperative care for this high-risk population.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
15.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(6): 1815-23, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26786090

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although controversial, recent data suggest a benefit associated with primary tumor resection (PTR) in metastatic colon cancer (mCC) patients. However, utilization of the various management strategies over time relative to surgery, in particular multimodality treatment (MMT), as well as the impact of age on treatment remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort study of mCC patients in the National Cancer Data Base (1998-2009). Temporal trends in treatment utilization (chemotherapy, PTR alone, MMT) were evaluated. Using a landmark approach, the association between treatment, age, and risk of death was evaluated with multivariable Cox regression, including interaction. RESULTS: Among 103,100 mCC patients, PTR decreased 50.1 % during the study period, whereas MMT and chemotherapy increased 27.4 and 104.8 %, respectively (trend test, p < 0.001). Patients aged ≥75 years were the only group for whom PTR alone was the most common intervention over time and performed more commonly (33.8 %) than MMT (23.8 %) in the most recent study year. Relative to MMT, risk of death was higher for all other management strategies. The sequence of PTR and chemotherapy (reference-surgery first) did not affect risk of death (chemotherapy first-1.05 [0.95-1.15]), as long resection was a part of MMT (PTR alone-1.16 [1.08-1.23]). Patient age did not impact the relative benefit associated with competing management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Although the benefit associated with PTR in mCC patients is a function of MMT, PTR alone remains a common management strategy among older patients. Given the aging U.S. population, exploring provider biases and patient preferences may be necessary to optimize management of mCC patients.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Colonic Neoplasms/secondary , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate
16.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 44(9): 397-405, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26372748

ABSTRACT

To address the lack of consensus on the leading reasons for readmissions after primary elective unilateral total joint arthroplasties (TJAs), we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to identify overall and cause-specific readmission rates. We performed structured searches of the Medline and Cochrane databases for original reports-published between January 1982 and January 2013-on both 30- and 90-day follow-ups of unique patient populations that underwent elective primary TJA. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to obtain pooled estimates. For total hip arthroplasty (THA), the overall pooled readmission rate was 5.6% at 30 days and 7.7% at 90 days. For total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the overall rate was 3.3% at 30 days and 9.7% at 90 days. The leading reason for THA readmission was joint-specific at both 30 and 90 days, and the leading reason for TKA readmission was surgical site infection. Our systematic review and meta-analysis established baseline readmission rates in the literature on primary TJA and identified the most common reasons driving readmission for TJA.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement , Elective Surgical Procedures , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Humans , Length of Stay , Risk Factors
17.
Ann Surg ; 261(4): 695-701, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24743615

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize transitional care needs (TCNs) after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery and examine their association with age and impact on overall survival (OS). BACKGROUND: TCNs after cancer surgery represent additional burden for patients and are associated with higher short-term mortality. They are not well-characterized in CRC patients, particularly in the context of a growing elderly population, and their effect on long-term survival is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of CRC patients (N = 486) having curative surgery at a tertiary referral center (2002-2011) was conducted. Outcomes included TCNs (home health or nonhome destination at discharge) and OS. Patients were compared on the basis of age: young (<65 years), old (65-74 years), and oldest (≥75 years). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the association of age with TCNs, and OS was compared on the basis of TCNs and stage, using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: TCNs were required by 130 patients (27%). The oldest patients had highest TCNs (49%) compared with the other age groups (P < 0.01), with rehabilitation services as their primary TCNs (80%). After multivariate analysis, patients 75 years or older had significantly increased TCN risk (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-8.5). TCN was associated with worse OS for patients with early- and advanced stage CRC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TCNs after CRC surgery are common and significantly increased in patients 75 years or older, represent an outcome of postoperative recovery, and are associated with worse long-term survival. Preoperative identification of higher risk populations should be used for patient counseling, advanced preoperative planning, and to implement strategies targeted at minimizing TCNs.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Continuity of Patient Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Care/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Odds Ratio , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
18.
Am J Surg ; 208(4): 670-6, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25241955

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study sought to identify the incidence, indications, and predictors of abdominal reoperation and mesh explantation following open ventral hernia repair with mesh (OVHR). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all patients at a single institution who underwent an OVHR from 2000 to 2010 was performed. Patients who required subsequent abdominal reoperation or mesh explantation were compared with those who did not. Reasons for reoperation were recorded. The 2 groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA). RESULTS: A total of 407 patients were followed for a median (range) of 57 (1 to 143) months. Subsequent abdominal reoperation was required in 69 (17%) patients. The most common reasons for reoperation were recurrence and surgical site infection. Only the number of prior abdominal surgeries was associated with abdominal reoperation on MVA. Twenty-eight patients (6.9%) underwent subsequent mesh explantation. Only the Ventral Hernia Working Group grade was associated with mesh explantation on MVA. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal reoperation and mesh explantation following OVHR are common. Overwhelmingly, surgical complications are themost common causes for reoperation and mesh explantation.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , Device Removal/methods , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Equipment Failure , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
19.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 15(5): 506-12, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25215466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mesh reinforcement as part of open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) has become the standard of care. However, there is no consensus on the ideal type of mesh to use. In many clinical situations, surgeons are reluctant to use synthetic mesh. Options in these complicated OVHRs include suture repair or the use of biologic mesh such as porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM). There has been a paucity of controlled studies reporting long-term outcomes with biologic meshes. We hypothesized that compared with synthetic mesh in OVHR, PADM is associated with fewer surgical site infections (SSI) but more seromas and recurrences. Additionally, compared with suture repair, we hypothesized that PADM is associated with fewer recurrences but more SSIs and seromas. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of all complicated OVHRs performed at a single institution from 2000-2011. All data were captured from the electronic medical records of the service network. Data were compared in two ways. First, patients who had OVHR with PADM were case-matched with patients having synthetic mesh repairs on the basis of incision class, Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grade, hernia size, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and emergency status. The PADM cases were also matched with suture repairs on the basis of incision class, hernia grade, duration of the operation, ASA class, and emergency status. Second, we developed a propensity score-adjusted multi-variable logistic regression model utilizing internal resampling to identify predictors of primary outcomes of the overall cohort. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition of SSI was utilized; seromas and recurrences were defined and tracked similarly for all patients. Data were analyzed using the McNemar, X(2), paired two-tailed Student t, or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 449 complicated OVHR cases were reviewed for a median follow up of 61 mos (range 1-143 mos): 94 patients had PADM repairs, whereas 154 patients underwent synthetic mesh repairs, and 201 had suture repairs. The 40 PADM repairs were matched to synthetic repairs and 59 were matched to suture repairs. The PADM repairs that could not be well matched (n=54 unmatched for synthetic repairs, 35 unmatched for suture repairs) were characterized generally by larger hernias, VHWG grades of 3 or 4, and incision class 3 or 4 with longer operative durations and more ASA class 4 cases. The patients were well matched. Comparing PADM with synthetic mesh, there was no difference in SSI (20% vs. 35%; p=0.29), seromas (32.5% vs. 15%; p=0.17), mesh explantations (5% vs. 15%, p=0.28), readmissions within 90 d (37.5% vs. 45%; p=1.00), or recurrence (8.5% vs. 22.5%; p=0.15). Compared with suture repair, patients with PADM had fewer recurrences (11.9% vs. 33.9%; p<0.01) and more seromas (32.2% vs. 10.2%; p=0.02), but a similar number of SSIs (23.7% vs. 39.0%; p=0.19) and 90-d readmissions (35.6% vs. 39.0%; p=0.88). Propensity score-adjusted multi-variable logistic regression of the entire cohort corroborated the results of the case-matched patients. CONCLUSIONS: The PADM repair of complicated OVHR resulted in fewer recurrences, more seromas, and no difference in SSI compared with suture repair. Although no reduction in SSI was identified with the use of PADM rather than synthetic mesh or suture for OVHR, the meaning of this finding is unclear, as this case-controlled study was underpowered and limited by selection bias. According to our data, 280 patients would have been needed to identify a clinically significant difference in the primary outcome of SSI as well as secondary outcomes of mesh explantation and recurrence (α=0.05; ß=0.20). A randomized trial is warranted to compare PADM with synthetic mesh in complicated OVHR.


Subject(s)
Acellular Dermis , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Heterografts , Surgical Mesh , Animals , Herniorrhaphy/instrumentation , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Swine , Treatment Outcome
20.
J Surg Res ; 192(2): 426-31, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24980854

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Repair of primary ventral hernias (PVH) such as umbilical hernias is a common surgical procedure. There is a paucity of risk-adjusted data comparing suture versus mesh repair of these hernias. We compared preperitoneal polypropylene (PP) repair versus suture repair for elective umbilical hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective review of all elective open PVH repairs at a single institution from 2000-2010 was performed. Only patients with suture or PP repair of umbilical hernias were included. Univariate analysis was conducted and propensity for treatment-adjusted multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 442 elective open PVH repairs performed; 392 met our inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 126 (32.1%) had a PP repair and 266 (67.9%) underwent suture repair. Median (range) follow-up was 60 mo (1-143). Patients who underwent PP repair had more surgical site infections (SSIs; 19.8% versus 7.9%, P < 0.01) and seromas (14.3% versus 4.1%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in recurrence (5.6% versus 7.5%, P = 0.53). On propensity score-adjusted multivariate analysis, we found that body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.10) and smoking status (OR, 2.3) were associated with recurrence. Mesh (OR, 2.34) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (OR, 1.95) were associated with SSI. Only mesh (OR, 3.41) was associated with seroma formation. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a trend toward more recurrence with suture repair in our study, this was not statistically significant. Mesh repair was associated with more SSI and seromas. Further prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to clarify the role of suture and mesh repair in PVH.


Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Hernia, Umbilical/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Surgical Mesh , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Suture Techniques , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Peritoneum/surgery , Polypropylenes , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Seroma/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...