Intravenous tirofiban therapy for patients with capsular warning syndrome.

Background: Capsular warning syndrome (CWS) is defined as recurrent episodes of transient ischaemic attacks ≥3 times during a short time frame. There is no effective therapy to stop these attacks. We, herein, report our experience of using intravenous tirofiban to treat CWS. Methods: All patients with CWS in our hospital from January 2013 to September 2017 were reviewed. Patients in tirofiban group (T-group) were treated by intravenous tirofiban at 0.4 µg/kg/min for 30 min followed by 0.1-0.15 µg/kg/min infusion. Other treatments (non-T-group) included thrombolytic, oral antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant. Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), systematic bleeding, new attacks after treatment, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at 24 hours and modified Rankin Scales (mRSs) at 3 months were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results: Of 23 patients qualified (15 in T-group, 8 in non-T-group), the duration of symptoms ranged from 2 to 100 min before treatments. After treatment, in T-group, four patients (26.7%) had recurrent attacks, and NIHSS scores were 0 in 11 patients (73.3%) at 24 hours. All patients reached a favourable outcome (mRS ≤2 at 3 months. In non-T-group, five patients (62.5%) had new attacks. NIHSS scores were 0 in two patients (25%) at 24 hours. At 3 months, seven patients (87.5%) reached a favourable outcome. Neither ICH nor systematic bleeding or thrombocytopaenia occurred in both groups of patients. Conclusions: Intravenous tirofiban can be a potentially effective and safe therapy to stop early symptomatic fluctuations and shorten the duration of functional deficits in patients with CWS.

Safety and preliminary efficacy of intravenous tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patient without arterial occlusion on neurovascular imaging studies.

BACKGROUND: There has been no effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who presented to the Emergency Department >4.5h without a visible arterial occlusion on the neurovascular imaging studies. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether intravenous antiplatelet agent tirofiban was safe and potentially effective in AIS patients who had no visible arterial occlusion and was outside of treatment window for Alteplase. The goal of this study was to collect preliminary data to plan a future phase II study. METHOD: Twenty-five patients received intravenous tirofiban therapy. The safety outcomes were assessed by the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), systematic bleeding and mortality. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at day 7 (or discharge) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90days. Outcomes for these patients were compared with a historical age-gender-admission-NIHSS matched cohort treated with aspirin and/or clopidogrel. RESULTS: The rate of intracerebral hemorrhage, systematic bleedings, and death were not found in both groups. At day 7 or discharge, the neurological function improved significantly in both treatment groups. However, the NIHSS score was lower in tirofiban group compared with the control group (2 vs.3, p=0.045). At 3months, more patients in tirofiban group had favorable outcomes (mRS 0-1) compared with control group (84% vs. 52%; adjusted odds ratio: 10.57; 95% CI: 1.54-72.33; p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous tirofiban appears to be safe and potentially effective for the ischemic stroke patients with no artery occlusion on neurovascular imaging studies and being out of the window for thrombolytic therapy. A next logic step is to plan for a phase II study.

Score model for predicting acute-on-chronic liver failure risk in chronic hepatitis B.

AIM: To establish a clinical scoring model to predict risk of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 1457 patients hospitalized for CHB between October 2008 and October 2013 at the Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China. The patients were divided into two groups: severe acute exacerbation (SAE) group (n = 382) and non-SAE group (n = 1075). The SAE group was classified as the high-risk group based on the higher incidence of ACLF in this group than in the non-SAE group (13.6% vs 0.4%). Two-thirds of SAE patients were randomly assigned to risk-model derivation and the other one-third to model validation. Univariate risk factors associated with the outcome were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model for screening independent risk factors. Each variable was assigned an integer value based on the regression coefficients, and the final score was the sum of these values in the derivation set. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: The risk prediction scoring model included the following four factors: age ≥ 40 years, total bilirubin ≥ 171 µmol/L, prothrombin activity 40%-60%, and hepatitis B virus DNA > 10(7) copies/mL. The sum risk score ranged from 0 to 7; 0-3 identified patients with lower risk of ACLF, whereas 4-7 identified patients with higher risk. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the cumulative risk for ACLF and ACLF-related death in the two risk groups (0-3 and 4-7 scores) of the primary cohort over 56 d, and log-rank test revealed a significant difference (2.0% vs 33.8% and 0.8% vs 9.4%, respectively; both P < 0.0001). In the derivation and validation data sets, the model had good discrimination (C index = 0.857, 95% confidence interval: 0.800-0.913 and C index = 0.889, 95% confidence interval: 0.820-0.957, respectively) and calibration demonstrated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ (2) = 4.516, P = 0.808 and χ (2) = 1.959, P = 0.923, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using the scoring model, clinicians can easily identify patients (total score ≥ 4) at high risk of ACLF and ACLF-related death early during SAE.