Screening and prevention of hepatitis C virus reactivation during chemotherapy.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation occurs in 23% of HCV-infected cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Forty-three percent of the patients with reactivation of HCV during chemotherapy develop a hepatitis flare. Most of the cancer patients with HCV reactivation have an unremarkable clinical course following an HCV-related hepatitis flare during chemotherapy. However, 26%-57% of the cancer patients developing an acute flare of chronic hepatitis C during chemotherapy require unanticipated discontinuation or dose reduction of chemotherapy, which results in deleterious changes in the cancer treatment plan. Although an optimal strategy for HCV screening in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy has not been established, universal pre-chemotherapy HCV testing for patients with hematological malignancies is recommended by current guidelines. All the currently approved direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) can be used in cancer patients, but the use of DAAs during chemotherapy should avoid drug-drug interactions between chemotherapy and antiviral agents. If there are no contraindications or anticipated drug-drug interactions, DAAs treatment can be administered before, during, or after chemotherapy. In conclusion, HCV reactivation occurs in approximately one-fourth of HCV-infected cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. An HCV-related hepatitis flare during chemotherapy may lead to the discontinuation of potentially life-saving chemotherapy. Currently, universal HCV screening is recommended in hematological malignancy patients before chemotherapy, but there is no evidence-based guideline for other cancer patients. DAAs treatment can cure HCV infection and prevent HCV reactivation during chemotherapy.

Severe acute exacerbation of HCV infection in cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy without antiviral prophylaxis.

No guidelines have been developed for the management of HCV-infected cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The current study aimed to investigate the incidence of severe acute exacerbation of HCV infection in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and to search for risk factors predicting severe acute exacerbation of HCV infection. This retrospective cohort study reviewed the clinical data of the cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in our institute from August 2012 to December 2017. Incidences of severe acute exacerbation of HCV infection in different kinds of cancers were assessed, and risk factors were analysed. Cancer patients with HCV infection (n = 306) had a higher frequency of severe acute liver injury (2.3% vs 0.7%; P = .003) than those without HCV infection (n = 4419). The incidence of severe acute exacerbation in HCV-infected haematological cancer patients was higher than that in those with HCC and non-HCC solid tumours (9.4% vs 1.9% and 1.1%). Rituximab-containing chemotherapy and haematological malignancy were the risk factors related to the acute exacerbation (P < .001 and P = .004, respectively). None of the patients with severe acute HCV flares developed hepatic decompensation or mortality. However, 57.1% of them discontinued chemotherapy due to liver dysfunction. In conclusion, HCV infection increases the risk of acute severe liver injury in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Rituximab-containing chemotherapy and haematological malignancy are the risk factors related to severe acute exacerbation of HCV infection in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Pre-chemotherapy HCV testing is therefore mandatory before rituximab-containing chemotherapy for the treatment of haematological malignancy.

Prevention of acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B infection in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in a hepatitis B virus endemic area.

UNLABELLED: Reactivation of hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy may cause interruption of chemotherapy and lead to liver failure and death. In our institute, a computerized order entry-based alert system was introduced in September 2011 to remind healthcare providers of HBV testing when prescribing chemotherapy. Since August 2012, an order entry-based therapeutic control system has been applied to ensure HBV prophylaxis during chemotherapy. This retrospective cohort study included cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital from November 2009 to June 2013. The prechemotherapy HBV screening rate, HBV prophylactic rate, and severe HBV acute exacerbation rate were compared between stages with different order systems. Newly diagnosed cancer patients (n = 2512) were included. The HBV testing rate in the screening reminder stage was higher than that in the educational stage (93.5% versus 40.2%, P < 0.001), whereas the adequate HBV prophylactic rates in the two order entry-based stages were comparable (41.1% versus 39.2%). Patients in the order entry-based therapeutic control stage had a higher HBV screening rate (99.3% versus 40.2%, P < 0.001) and a higher HBV prophylactic rate (95.8% versus 39.2%, P < 0.001) than those in the educational stage. Additionally, the severe HBV acute exacerbation rate in the therapeutic control stage was lower than those in the educational and screening reminder stages (0% versus 1.2% and 1.2%, respectively; both P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A computerized order entry-based therapeutic control system can provide excellent prechemotherapy HBV screening for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and can effectively prevent severe acute exacerbation of HBV infection in hospitals among HBV endemic areas.

Comparison of hemostatic efficacy of argon plasma coagulation with and without distilled water injection in treating high-risk bleeding ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is useful to treat upper gastrointestinal bleeding, but its hemostatic efficacy has received little attention. Aims. This investigation attempted to determine whether additional endoscopic injection before APC could improve hemostatic efficacy in treating high-risk bleeding ulcers. METHODS: From January 2007 to April 2011, adult patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers were included. This investigation compared APC plus distilled water injection (combined group) to APC alone for treating high-risk bleeding ulcers. Outcomes were assessed based on initial hemostasis, surgery, blood transfusion, hospital stay, rebleeding, and mortality at 30 days posttreatment. RESULTS: Totally 120 selected patients were analyzed. Initial hemostasis was accomplished in 59 patients treated with combined therapy and 57 patients treated with APC alone. No significant differences were noted between these groups in recurred bleeding, emergency surgery, 30-day mortality, hospital stay, or transfusion requirements. Comparing the combined end point of mortality plus the failure of initial hemostasis, rebleeding, and the need for surgery revealed an advantage for the combined group (P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic therapy with APC plus distilled water injection was no more effective than APC alone in treating high-risk bleeding ulcers, whereas combined therapy was potentially superior for patients with poor overall outcomes.