Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Dig Liver Dis ; 48(4): 360-70, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26821929

ABSTRACT

Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) are chronic, relapsing conditions resulting from uncontrolled inflammation of the intestinal mucosa. Both conditions are associated with significant disability and patients with CD face higher mortality rates compared to the general population. The increasing understanding of the immunological basis of the disease led to the introduction of biologic therapies targeting key pathways of the natural and adaptive immune response such as Tumor Necrosis Factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors and, more recently, integrin-receptor antagonists. Treatment with TNF-α inhibitors improved clinical and patient-reported outcomes for many patients who did not benefit from conventional therapy. However, a sizeable share of patients still face suboptimal outcomes due to primary or secondary therapy failure. With the introduction of VDZ, a biologic treatment targeting novel IBD-relevant biologic pathways, it is crucial to understand how to integrate such innovations into current clinical practice. To this end, a panel of 14 Italian experts in the management of IBD met for a roundtable discussion. Recommendations concerning the management of moderate-to-severe IBD based on experts' opinions and literature review are discussed in the present report.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Biological Therapy/methods , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Disease Management , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/classification , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Severity of Illness Index
2.
J Crohns Colitis ; 8(10): 1217-21, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24630485

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of endoscopic recurrence (ER) in Crohn's disease following curative resection is up to 75% at 1 year. Endoscopy is the most sensitive method to detect the earliest mucosal changes and the severe ER at 1 year seems to predict a clinical relapse. METHODS: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence of early ER 6 months after curative resection. Secondary outcome was to evaluate the role of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in the prevention of ER at 6 months. A total of 170 patients were included in the study. They were carried-out from the evaluation of the appearance of ER during a trial performed to assess the role of azathioprine vs. 5-ASA as early treatment of severe ER. All the patients started 5-ASA treatment 2 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Six months after surgery ER was observed in 105 patients (62%). The endoscopic score was reported as severe in 78.1% of them (82 out of 105). At univariable analysis only ileo-colonic disease influenced the final outcome associating to a lower risk of severe ER (p=0.04; OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.277-0.974). CONCLUSION: In this prospective Italian multicenter IG-IBD study a great proportion of ER occur within 6 months from ileo-colonic resection, with a significant rate of severe ER. Furthermore this study confirms the marginal role of 5-ASA in the prevention of ER. This suggests that post-surgical endoscopic evaluation should be performed at 6 months instead of 1 year to allow an adequate early treatment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Crohn Disease/pathology , Crohn Disease/prevention & control , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Adult , Colonoscopy , Crohn Disease/surgery , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Young Adult
3.
Rev Recent Clin Trials ; 7(4): 314-20, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23092235

ABSTRACT

Intravenous steroids are considered the mainstay of treatment in patients with severe ulcerative colitis. Several randomized controlled trials have been designed to evaluate drugs that, as an adjunct to intravenous steroids, could obtain a clinical response and avoid colectomy in patients who do not respond to corticosteroids. For steroid refractory patients, cyclosporine and infliximab seem to be an effective alternative to colectomy in the short term, but more data are needed to evaluate if they can prevent colectomy also in the long term. Although there is no evidence from the published trials that antibiotics as adjunctive therapy may have an additional benefit, therapeutic protocols for severe ulcerative colitis generally include antibiotics for patients with signs of toxicity, or with worsening of symptoms despite the medical treatment. No additional benefit over steroids has been shown from bowel rest. Moreover, as bowel rest deprives the colonic enterocytes of the short-chain fatty acids vital to their metabolism and repair, it may even be harmful. Conflicting results have been published on heparin as primary treatment of severe ulcerative colitis; at the present time there is no evidence supporting its use. Although "steroid-free" clinical remission is, at this time, the most important end point of clinical studies in inflammatory bowel disease, only few data are available in steroid dependent colitis patients. Azathioprine seems to be effective in inducing steroid-free remission.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Humans , Infliximab , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...