ABSTRACT
A novel H-shaped miniplate (HSM) was specifically designed for restorative laminoplasties to restore patients' posterior elements after laminectomies. A validated finite element (FE) model of L2/4 was utilized to create a laminectomy model, as well as three restorative laminoplasty models based on the fixation of different miniplates after a laminectomy (the RL-HSM model, the RL-LSM model, and the RL-THM model). The biomechanical effects of motion and displacement on a laminectomy and restorative laminoplasty with three different shapes for the fixation of miniplates were compared under the same mechanical conditions. This study aimed to validate the biomechanical stability, efficacy, and feasibility of a restorative laminoplasty with the fixation of miniplates post laminectomy. The laminectomy model demonstrated the greatest increase in motion and displacement, especially in axial rotation, followed by extension, flexion, and lateral bending. The restorative laminoplasty was exceptional in preserving the motion and displacement of surgical segments when compared to the intact state. This preservation was particularly evident in lateral bending and flexion/extension, with a slight maintenance efficacy observed in axial rotation. Compared to the laminectomy model, the restorative laminoplasties with the investigated miniplates demonstrated a motion-limiting effect for all directions and resulted in excellent stability levels under axial rotation and flexion/extension. The greatest reduction in motion and displacement was observed in the RL-HSM model, followed by the RL-LSM model and then the RL-THM model. When comparing the fixation of different miniplates in restorative laminoplasties, the HSMs were found to be superior to the LSMs and THMs in maintaining postoperative stability, particularly in axial rotation. The evidence suggests that a restorative laminoplasty with the fixation of miniplates is more effective than a conventional laminectomy due to the biomechanical effects of restoring posterior elements, which helps patients regain motion and limit load displacement responses in the spine after surgery, especially in axial rotation and flexion/extension. Additionally, our evaluation in this research study could benefit from further research and provide a methodological and modeling basis for the design and optimization of restorative laminoplasties.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To establish the finite element model of spinal canal reconstruction and internal fixation,analysis influence of spinal canal reconstruction and internal fixation on spinal stability,and verify the effectiveness and reliability of spinal canal reconstruction and internal fixation in spinal canal surgery. METHODS: A 30-year-old male healthy volunteer with a height of 172 cm and weight of 75 kg was selected and his lumbar CT data were collected to establish a finite element model of normal lumbar L3-L5,and the results were compared with in vitro solid results and published finite element analysis results to verify the validity of the model. They were divided into normal group,laminectomy group and spinal canal reconstruction group according to different treatment methods. Under the same boundary fixation and physiological load conditions,six kinds of activities were performed,including forward bending,backward extension,left bending,right bending,left rotation and right rotation,and the changes of range of motion (ROM) of L3-L4,L4-L5 segments and overall maximum ROM of L3-L5 were analyzed under the six conditions. RESULTS: The ROM displacement range of each segment of the constructed L3-L5 finite element model was consistent with the in vitro solid results and previous literature data,which confirms the validity of the model. In L3-L4,ROM of spinal canal reconstruction group was slightly increased than that of normal group during posterior extension(>5% difference),and ROM of other conditions was similar to that of normal group(<5% difference). ROM in laminectomy group was significantly increase than that in normal group and spinal canal reconstruction group under the condition of flexion,extension,left and right rotation. In L4-L5,ROM in spinal canal reconstruction group was similar to that in normal group(<5% difference),while ROM in laminectomy group was significantly higher than that in normal group and spinal canal reconstruction group(>5% difference). In the overall maximum ROM of L3-L5,spinal canal reconstruction group was only slightly higher than normal group under the condition of posterior extension(>5% difference),while laminectomy was significantly higher than normal group and spinal canal reconstruction group under the condition of anterior flexion,posterior extension,left and right rotation(>5% difference). The changes of each segment ROM and overall ROM of L3-L5 showed laminectomy group>spinal canal reconstruction group>normal group. CONCLUSION: Laminectomy could seriously affect biomechanical stability of the spine,but application of spinal canal reconstruction and internal fixation could effectively reduce ROM displacement of the responsible segment of spine and maintain its biomechanical stability.
