Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 177: 111589, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941821

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess T1 mapping performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions and to explore its correlation with histopathologic features in breast cancer. METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled 103 participants with a total of 108 lesions, including 25 benign and 83 malignant lesions. T1 mapping, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) were performed. Two radiologists independently outlined the ROIs and analyzed T1 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for each lesion, assessing interobserver reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). T1 and ADC values were compared between benign and malignant lesions, across different histopathological characteristics (histological grades, estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors expression, Ki67, N status). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ) were performed. RESULTS: T1 values showed statistically significant differences between benign and malignant groups (P < 0.001), with higher values in the malignant (1817.08 ms ± 126.64) compared to the benign group (1429.31 ms ± 167.66). In addition, T1 values significantly increased in the ER (-) group (P = 0.001). No significant differences were found in T1 values among HER2, Ki67, N status, and histological grades groups. Furthermore, T1 values exhibited a significant correlation (ρ) with ER (P < 0.01) and PR (P = 0.03). The AUC for T1 value in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions was 0.69 (95 % CI: 0.55 - 0.82, P = 0.005), and for evaluating ER status, it was 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.62 - 0.87, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: T1 mapping holds the potential as an imaging biomarker to assist in the discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions and assessing the ER expression status in breast cancer.

2.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 22(11): 2073-2079, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31647182

ABSTRACT

We describe a previously unreported association of ankylosing spondylitis with synovial chondromatosis, and briefly review previously reported cases and treatment of synovial chondromatosis in patients with other immune-mediated inflammatory arthritides. A 20-year-old man with ankylosing spondylitis whose axial disease was in remission with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs developed recurrent right knee pain and swelling. Magnetic resonance imaging of his right knee revealed calcified loose bodies, suggestive of synovial chondromatosis. While waiting for the surgical intervention and other invasive therapy previously reported in patients with synovial chondromatosis, a trial of etanercept eliminated the pain and swelling of the knee; however, the loose bodies have persisted during the 2-year follow-up. Thus, synovial chondromatosis should be considered in the differential diagnoses of a refractory monoarticular pain and swelling in patients with otherwise controlled inflammatory arthritis. Our report advocates a trial of anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs, which might delay the need for invasive therapy in patients with synovial chondromatosis.


Subject(s)
Chondromatosis, Synovial/drug therapy , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Chondromatosis, Synovial/diagnosis , Chondromatosis, Synovial/immunology , Humans , Male , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/diagnosis , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/immunology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...