ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Randomized sham-controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from major databases from the inception date of January 1990 to January 2023. Primary outcome was improvement in total symptoms of ADHD. Subgroup analysis focused on rTMS efficacy targeting different brain regions. Secondary outcomes were associations of rTMS with improvements in different symptoms of ADHD. Outcomes were expressed as effect size (ES) based on standardized mean difference (SMD) (continuous data), and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) (categorical data). RESULTS: Meta-analysis of six RCTs involving 169 participants demonstrated no difference in total ADHD symptoms between rTMS-treated participants and sham controls (SMD=-0.24,p=0.17). Subgroup analysis revealed better efficacy of rTMS than sham controls when targeting right prefrontal cortex (rPFC) (SMD=-0.49,p=0.03), but not left prefrontal cortex (lPFC) (SMD= 0.01,p=0.67). rTMS treatment correlated with better improvement in symptoms of inattention (SMD=-0.76,p=0.0002), but not hyperactivity (p=0.86), impulsivity (p=0.41), and depression (p=0.95). The apparently higher risk of dropout in the rTMS group than sham controls was not statistically significant (OR=1.65,p=0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Our study only supported the therapeutic efficacy of rTMS targeting rPFC for the symptoms of ADHD, especially inattention, but not that targeting lPFC. Further large-scale randomized sham-controlled trials are required to verify our findings.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of probiotics as a therapeutic alternative for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remain unclear. AIMS: To investigate the effectiveness of probiotics for symptoms of ADHD and identify possible factors affecting their efficacy. METHOD: Randomised placebo-controlled trials were identified through searching major databases from inception to April 2023, using the main keywords 'probiotics' and 'ADHD' without limitation on languages or geographic locations. The outcome of interest included improvement in total symptoms of ADHD, symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity, and drop-out rate. Continuous and categorical data were expressed as effect sizes based on standardised mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of seven trials involving 379 participants (mean age 10.37 years, range 4-18 years) showed no significant improvement in total symptoms of ADHD (SMD = 0.25; P = 0.12), symptoms of inattention (SMD = 0.14; P = 0.3) or hyperactivity/impulsivity (SMD = 0.08; P = 0.54) between the probiotic and placebo groups. Despite non-significance on subgroup analyses, there was a large difference in effect size between studies using probiotics as an adjunct to methylphenidate and those using probiotics as supplementation (SMD = 0.84 v. 0.07; P = 0.16), and a moderate difference in effect size between studies using multiple strains of probiotics and those using single-strain regimens (SMD = 0.45 v. 0.03; P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence shows no significant difference in therapeutic efficacy between probiotics and placebos for treatment of ADHD symptoms. However, albeit statistically non-significant, higher therapeutic efficacies associated with multiple-strain probiotics or combining probiotics with methylphenidate may provide direction for further research.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic efficacies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for improving cognitive functions in patients with deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remained unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of rTMS focusing on different cognitive performances. METHODS: Major databases were searched electronically from inception to February 2023 by using keywords mainly "rTMS" and "ADHD" to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the therapeutic efficacy of rTMS for improving cognitive functions assessed by standardized tasks in patients with ADHD. The overall effect size (ES) was calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD) based on a random effects model. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of five RCTs with 189 participants (mean age of 32.78 and 8.53 years in adult and child/adolescent populations, respectively) demonstrated that rTMS was more effective for improving sustained attention in patients with ADHD compared with the control groups (SMD = 0.54, p = 0.001).Our secondary analysis also showed that rTMS was more effective for improving processing speed than the control groups (SMD = 0.59, p = 0.002) but not for enhancing memory or executive function. CONCLUSIONS: Our results supported the therapeutic efficacy of rTMS for improving sustained attention and processing speed. However, the limitation of available data warrants further studies to verify these findings.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adult , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Cognition , Executive Function , Processing SpeedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No established pharmacological treatment is available for the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study aimed at investigating the efficacy of antidepressants for the core and associated symptoms of ASD. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalKey, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov using the keywords "ASD" and "antidepressants." We searched from database inception to June 2021 for randomized controlled trials of antidepressant use in patients with ASD. We calculated pooled effect sizes based on a random-effects model. RESULTS: Analysis of 16 studies with 899 participants showed improvements in restricted and repetitive behaviours (effect size = 0.27) and global symptoms (effect size = 1.0) in patients with ASD taking antidepressants versus those taking placebos (p ≤ 0.01). We found no differences between the 2 groups (p ≥ 0.36) in terms of dropout rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17) or rate of study discontinuation because of adverse events (OR = 1.05). We also noted improvements in irritability and hyperactivity in the antidepressant group (Hedges g = 0.33 and 0.22, respectively, both p < 0.03). Subgroup analyses showed significant effects of medication type (i.e., clomipramine was better than SSRIs) and age (antidepressants were more effective in adults than in children or adolescents) on both restricted and repetitive behaviours and global improvement (p < 0.05). Meta-regression demonstrated that better therapeutic effects were associated with lower symptom severity and older age. LIMITATIONS: The small effect sizes and variations in treatment response that we found warrant further study. CONCLUSION: Our results supported the effectiveness of antidepressants for global symptoms and symptom subdomains of ASD, with tolerable adverse effects. Low symptom severity and adulthood were associated with better outcomes.
