Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Toxicol ; 21 Suppl 1: S115-9, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11920931

ABSTRACT

Benzodiazepines, mainly diazepam, are commonly used as anticonvulsants in the treatment of organophosphate casualties. Although very effective, diazepam usually is not used in prophylactic treatments because of its adverse effects on task performance and its abuse liability. Benzodiazepine (BZ) partial agonists are unique in that they are able to occupy all the population of a given receptor without eliciting the maximal physiological response. The BZ receptor agonistic occupancy was found to differ among the various physiological responses in the following order: antipanic > anticonvulsion > sedation > muscle relaxation. Thus, partial agonists, by the use of which controlled levels of agonistic activity can be achieved, might serve as effective anticonvulsants, with fewer side-effects. Bretazenil, a partial agonist, was found to counteract metrazol-induced convulsions in rats. At the anticonvulsive doses (125-250 microg x kg(-1), i.p.) bretazenil, in combination with pyridostigmine (100 microg x kg(-1), i.m.) and aprophen (4 mg x kg(-1), i.m.), conferred prophylactic protection against sarin and soman poisoning (protective ratios 2.6 and 2.1, respectively). Relevant doses of bretazenil (50-400 microg x kg(-1), i.p.) also were tested for general behavioural effects in the open field and for its anti-anxiety properties in the plus maze. The incapacitation was much lower compared with diazepam. Bretazenil should be considered as a candidate for incorporating into a prophylactic mixture as a central nervous system protectant, with significant advantages concerning incapacitation.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Benzodiazepinones/pharmacology , Chemical Warfare Agents/toxicity , Neuroprotective Agents/pharmacology , Organophosphorus Compounds/toxicity , Poisoning/prevention & control , Animals , Male , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Receptors, GABA-A/drug effects , Receptors, GABA-A/physiology
2.
J Appl Toxicol ; 20 Suppl 1: S109-14, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11428620

ABSTRACT

Ocular injuries following sulfur mustard (HD) exposure are characterized by an inflammatory response, observed as eyelid swelling, conjunctivitis, corneal oedema and cellular infiltration starting 1-4 h after exposure, depending on dose. These effects heal partially during the first 1-2 weeks after exposure, with the later appearance of neovascularization, recurrent erosions and recurrent oedema of the cornea (delayed response). We have shown previously that topically applied steroid treatment, administered after HD exposure, attenuated the extent of neovascularization, one of the characteristics of delayed ocular pathology in rabbits. The present study was designed to characterize further the initial inflammatory response and to elucidate the role of anti-inflammatory (AI) drugs as a potential therapy. Rabbit eyes were exposed to HD vapour (390 microg l(-1) for 2 min) and were treated with a topical commercial ophthalmic solution of dexamethasone or diclofenac, starting 1 h post-exposure (four times a day). Inflammation was evaluated by clinical observations, biochemical analysis of aqueous humour and by histology. Sulfur mustard exposure initiated typical clinical ocular symptoms within 4-6 h after exposure. Biochemical analysis of aqueous humour showed that protein content and prostaglandin E (PGE) increased significantly at 6 h and were still high 48 h after HD exposure. Light microscopy evaluation revealed severe damage to the cornea, characterized by epithelial denudation, oedema and cellular infiltration (mostly eosinophiles) in the stroma. Both treatments were effective in alleviating the clinical symptoms and in preventing the HD-induced increase in protein and PGE in the anterior chamber, as well as the cellular infiltration, in the corneal stroma. However, the AI treatments had no therapeutic effect on corneal erosions, and a short delay in epithelial regeneration was noted. It is concluded that AI drugs are potential candidates for the treatment of ocular lesions following HD exposure.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Dermatologic Agents/toxicity , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Diclofenac/pharmacology , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/prevention & control , Eye/drug effects , Mustard Gas/toxicity , Animals , Cornea/pathology , Eye/pathology , Inflammation , Rabbits , Volatilization
3.
J Appl Toxicol ; 20 Suppl 1: S133-6, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11428625

ABSTRACT

Sulfur mustard (HD) is a potent cutaneous vesicant that penetrates rapidly through the skin, causing prolonged injuries and leading to severe incapacitation. Although there has been long and intensive efforts to find a treatment for HD skin lesions, no effective treatment is available for HD-induced skin injuries. Recently, ointments containing calmodulin antagonists were found to be effective in preventing skin injuries induced by HD in hairless mice. The present study was designed to investigate the beneficial effects of topical treatments with calmodulin antagonists against HD skin lesions in the pig model. The pig is used as a preferred animal model for human skin in many studies, including vesicants. Neat HD, either in liquid form (0.2-1 microl droplets) or as vapour, was applied to the back skin of female pigs (a cross Large White & Landrace, 10-12 kg) for various exposure durations. Evaluation was based on quantitative analysis of the degree of erythema and area of the lesions, as well as histological evaluation. Calmodulin antagonists (10% pentamide, 1% trifluoperazine, 2% thioridazine) and anaesthetics (20% lidocaine and 3% benoxinate) were dissolved in pluronic F-127 base according to Kim et al. (Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1996; 313: 107-114) or in saline, and were applied either topically as ointments or by intradermal injection, as early as 5 min post-exposure (twice a day for at least 3 days). The results demonstrated that topically applied pluronic base ointments containing lidocaine or pentamide produce beneficial effects when applied immediately after short-term HD exposure to pig skin.


Subject(s)
Blister/chemically induced , Calmodulin/antagonists & inhibitors , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Dopamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Mustard Gas/adverse effects , Procaine/analogs & derivatives , Thioridazine/pharmacology , Trifluoperazine/pharmacology , Administration, Topical , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Animals , Blister/drug therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Dopamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Female , Injections, Intradermal , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/pharmacology , Procaine/administration & dosage , Procaine/pharmacology , Swine , Thioridazine/administration & dosage , Trifluoperazine/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...