Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
2.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ; 81(2): 141-149, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36410034

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: GReek-AntiPlatElet Atrial Fibrillation registry is a multicenter, observational, noninterventional study of atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Primary endpoint included clinically significant bleeding rate at 12 months between different antithrombotic regimens prescribed at discharge; secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse clinical events. A total of 647 patients were analyzed. Most (92.9%) were discharged on novel oral anticoagulants with only 7.1% receiving the vitamin K antagonist. A little over half of patients (50.4%) received triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT)-mostly (62.9%) for ≤1 month-whereas the rest (49.6%) received dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT). Clinically significant bleeding risk was similar between TAT and DAT [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66-1.78], although among TAT-receiving patients, the risk was lower in those receiving TAT for ≤1 month (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.99). Anticoagulant choice (novel oral anticoagulant vs. vitamin K antagonist) did not significantly affect bleeding rates ( P = 0.258). Age, heart failure, leukemia/myelodysplasia, and acute coronary syndrome were associated with increased bleeding rates. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse clinical events was similar between ΤAT and DAT (HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 0.95-3.18, P = 0.075 and HR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.93-2.08, P = 0.106, respectively). In conclusion, clinically significant bleeding and ischemic rates were similar between DAT and TAT, although TAT >1 month was associated with higher bleeding risk.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Greece , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Registries , Vitamin K , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects
3.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 55(1): 42-50, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36369420

ABSTRACT

Platelet function testing (PFT) could be a useful clinical tool to guide individualized antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate platelet reactivity (PR) in the context of a contemporary registry. "Real-world" data were retrieved from a nationwide, multicenter, observational study of AF patients on oral anticoagulants (OAC) undergoing PCI. Patients treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor, namely clopidogrel or ticagrelor, as part of double or triple antithrombotic therapy, were submitted to PFT before discharge and were followed up for 12 months. Out of 101 patients included in the study, 66 were submitted to PFT while on clopidogrel and 35 while on ticagrelor; PR was 162.9 ± 68 PRU and 46.02 ± 46 PRU, respectively (P < 0.001). High on-treatment PR (HTPR) was observed in 15 patients under clopidogrel (22.7%); 7 of them escalated to ticagrelor. Low on-treatment PR (LTPR) was found in 9 clopidogrel and 28 ticagrelor-treated patients (13.6% vs. 80%, P < 0.001), of whom only 1 de-escalated to clopidogrel. PR did not differ by OAC regimen. PFT results had no impact on aspirin prescription at discharge, while failed to predict significant bleeding events at follow up. Ticagrelor administration led to lower PR and lower incidence of HTPR in comparison with clopidogrel. Physicians' behavior in response to knowledge of a patient's PR was variable. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of PFT as a tool to guide individualized antithrombotic treatment in this clinical scenario.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Clopidogrel/therapeutic use , Ticagrelor/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
6.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ; 35(1): 11-20, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33034806

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are a high-risk subset of patients, whose optimal antithrombotic treatment strategy, involving a combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents, has not been well defined. Our study aims to investigate contemporary "real-world" trends of antithrombotic treatment strategies in AF patients undergoing PCI, as well as identify factors affecting decision-making at hospital discharge. METHODS: "Real-world" data were retrieved from the GReek-AntiPlatElet Atrial Fibrillation (GRAPE-AF) registry, a contemporary, nationwide, multicenter, observational study of AF patients undergoing PCI. Characteristics of patients discharged on triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) or dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) were compared in order to identify factors that could influence treatment decisions. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients were enrolled (42% with stable coronary artery disease, 58% with acute coronary syndrome). TAT was adopted in 49.9% and DAT in 49.2% of patients at discharge. Regarding anticoagulants, the vast majority of patients (92.9%) received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and only 7.1% received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Dyslipidemia, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome at presentation, and regional variations were predictive of TAT adoption, whereas the use of NOACs or ticagrelor was predictive of DAT adoption. CONCLUSION: Contemporary "real-world" data concerning antithrombotic treatment in AF patients undergoing PCI indicate a strong shift towards the use of NOACs instead of VKAs, along with a large subset of patients adopting an aspirin-free strategy early after index PCI, with clinical as well as treatment characteristics affecting decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03362788 (First Posted: December 5, 2017).


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Comorbidity , Drug Therapy, Combination , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy/methods , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Residence Characteristics , Sociodemographic Factors , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors
7.
JACC Case Rep ; 2(1): 19-23, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34316958

ABSTRACT

Takayasu arteritis is a rare cause of cardiovascular morbidity in the Western world. As consequence, vasculitis may be misdiagnosed and treated as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We present a case of late Takayasu arteritis diagnosis, in a female patient with peripheral artery disease and previous coronary artery bypass grafting. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

8.
Platelets ; 31(6): 812-814, 2020 Aug 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608799

ABSTRACT

Given that patients with prior myocardial infarction and features of high ischemic and low bleeding risk may benefit by extending dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year, we aimed of assessing platelet reactivity provided by ticagrelor 60 mg bid versus prasugrel 5 mg od in 20 such patients participating in a randomized, crossover study. The primary end point of platelet reactivity at the end of the two treatment periods (by VerifyNow, in PRU) was significantly lower for ticagrelor (31.9 PRU [95% CI 12.3-51.4]) compared with prasugrel (132.1 PRU [111.9-152.3]) with a least squares mean difference of -100.2 PRU (72.1-128.3, P < .001). This dedicated pharmacodynamic study showed that in post-myocardial infarction patients with high atherothrombotic risk and receiving P2Y12 receptor antagonist beyond 1 year, low-dose ticagrelor results in a significantly lower platelet reactivity compared to low-dose prasugrel.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Ticagrelor/therapeutic use , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/pharmacology , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/pharmacology , Ticagrelor/pharmacology
9.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 17(10): 717-727, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31583920

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Inhibition of P2Y12 platelet receptors consists a crucial target of pharmacologic treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients. Several controversial issues however still remain and these are analyzed.Areas covered: The significance of early and strong platelet inhibition in the early phase of STEMI and the role of pretreatment are discussed. Concerns regarding morphine administration are raised. The role of crushing integral tablets to expedite the onset of action of oral P2Y12 inhibitors is emphasized. New data on the intravenous cangrelor are reported. Antiplatelet therapies as adjunct to thrombolysis, as well as the role of de-escalation antiplatelet therapy are analyzed.Expert opinion: Pharmacodynamic studies convincingly demonstrate a gap in the onset of antiplatelet action in STEMI cases, even when prasugrel or ticagrelor loading dose is used. The clinical benefit, however, of the early platelet inhibition and pretreatment is not entirely clear. Morphine delays the onset of action of oral agents, while this is expedited by crushing the integral tablets. Cangrelor devoids of these deficiencies by achieving fast and strong platelet inhibition in all clinical scenarios. Concomitant administration of novel antiplatelet agents with thrombolysis and de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment necessitate further study to reach definite conclusion.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Adenosine Monophosphate/administration & dosage , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Administration, Intravenous , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Ticagrelor/administration & dosage
10.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther ; 24(4): 304-314, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30722685

ABSTRACT

In patients with an acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, prasugrel and ticagrelor, are proposed as "first-line" antiplatelet agents in the absence of contraindications and up to a year from the index event. However, de-escalation of treatment to clopidogrel occurs with a variable frequency in real-life practice, most commonly due to an increased bleeding potential, more frequent side effects, and a higher cost for the novel agents. Pharmacodynamic studies provide most of the data on guidance for de-escalation. Despite positive messages from recent trials and registries, lack of definitive efficacy or safety results of such a strategy remains an obstacle to suggest de-escalation in a routine basis. Carefully designed studies are likely to improve our understanding of the impact of de-escalation and help to better define its position in current pharmacotherapy.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Administration, Oral , Animals , Clinical Decision-Making , Coronary Thrombosis/etiology , Coronary Thrombosis/prevention & control , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Substitution , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...