Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Rucaparib.

Rucaparib is an oral small-molecule poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor indicated for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in the maintenance and treatment settings and for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer associated with a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Rucaparib has a manageable safety profile; the most common adverse events reported were fatigue and nausea in both indications. Accumulation in plasma exposure occurred after repeated administration of the approved 600-mg twice-daily dosage. Steady state was achieved after continuous twice-daily dosing for a week. Rucaparib has moderate oral bioavailability and can be dosed with or without food. Although a high-fat meal weakly increased maximum concentration and area under the curve, the effect was not clinically significant. A mass balance analysis indicated almost a complete dose recovery of rucaparib over 12 days, with metabolism, renal, and hepatic excretion as the elimination routes. A population pharmacokinetic analysis of rucaparib revealed no effect of age, sex, race, or body weight. No starting dose adjustments were necessary for patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic or renal impairment; the effect of severe organ impairment on rucaparib exposure has not been evaluated. In patients, rucaparib moderately inhibited cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and weakly inhibited CYP3As, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. Rucaparib weakly increased systemic exposures of oral contraceptives and oral rosuvastatin and marginally increased the exposure of oral digoxin (a P-glycoprotein substrate). In vitro studies suggested that rucaparib inhibits transporters MATE1, MATE2-K, OCT1, and OCT2. No clinically meaningful drug interactions with rucaparib as a perpetrator were observed. An exposure-response analysis revealed dose-dependent changes in selected clinical efficacy and safety endpoints. Overall, this article provides a comprehensive review of the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug-drug interactions, effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, and exposure-response relationships of rucaparib.

The Multi-Kinase Inhibitor Lucitanib Enhances the Antitumor Activity of Coinhibitory and Costimulatory Immune Pathway Modulators in Syngeneic Models.

Lucitanib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor whose targets are associated with angiogenesis and other key cancer and immune pathways. Its antiangiogenic properties are understood, but lucitanib's immunomodulatory activity is heretofore unknown. Lucitanib exhibited such activity in vivo, increasing CD3 + , CD8 + , and CD4 + T cells and decreasing dendritic cells and monocyte-derived suppressor cells in mouse spleens. Depletion of CD8 + T cells from syngeneic MC38 colon tumor-bearing mice reduced the antitumor efficacy of lucitanib and revealed a CD8 + T-cell-dependent component of lucitanib's activity. The combination of lucitanib and costimulatory immune pathway agonists targeting 4-1BB, glucocorticoid-induced TNFR (GITR), inducible T-cell co-stimulator (ICOS), or OX40 exhibited enhanced antitumor activity compared with each single agent in immunocompetent tumor models. Lucitanib combined with blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) or programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) coinhibitory immune pathways also showed enhanced antitumor activity over the single agents in multiple models. In CT26 tumors, lucitanib, alone or combined with anti-PD-1, reduced CD31 + vessels and depleted F4/80 + macrophages. Combination treatment also increased the number of intratumoral T cells. Gene expression in pathways associated with immune activity was upregulated by lucitanib in MC38 tumors and further potentiated by combination with anti-PD-1. Accordingly, lucitanib, alone or combined with anti-PD-1, increased intratumoral CD8 + T-cell abundance. Lucitanib's antitumor and pharmacodynamic activity, alone or combined with anti-PD-1, was not recapitulated by specific vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) inhibition. These data indicate that lucitanib can modulate vascular and immune components of the tumor microenvironment and cooperate with immunotherapy to enhance antitumor efficacy. They support the clinical development of lucitanib combined with immune pathway modulators to treat cancer.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Lucitanib in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lucitanib is an oral, potent, selective inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1‒3, fibroblast growth factor receptors 1‒3, and platelet-derived growth factor receptors alpha/beta. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) model for lucitanib in patients with advanced cancers. METHODS: PopPK analyses were based on intensive and sparse oral pharmacokinetic data from 5 phase 1/2 clinical studies of lucitanib in a total of 403 patients with advanced cancers. Lucitanib was administered at 5‒30 mg daily doses as 1 of 2 immediate-release oral formulations: a film-coated tablet or a hard gelatin capsule. RESULTS: Lucitanib pharmacokinetics were best described by a 2-compartment model with zero-order release into the dosing compartment, followed by first-order absorption and first-order elimination. Large between-subject pharmacokinetic variability was partially explained by body weight. No effects of demographics or tumor type on lucitanib pharmacokinetics were observed. The model suggested that the formulation impacted release duration (tablet, 0.243 h; capsule, 0.814 h), but the effect was not considered clinically meaningful. No statistically significant effects were detected for concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors or inducers, CYP2C8 or P-glycoprotein inhibitors, serum albumin, mild/moderate renal impairment, or mild hepatic impairment. Concomitant proton pump inhibitors had no clinically significant effect on lucitanib absorption. CONCLUSIONS: The PopPK model adequately described lucitanib pharmacokinetics. High between-subject pharmacokinetic variability supports a safety-based dose-titration strategy currently being used in an ongoing clinical study of lucitanib to optimize drug exposure and clinical benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01283945, NCT02053636, ISRCTN23201971, NCT02202746, NCT02109016.

A phase 1, open-label, drug-drug interaction study of rucaparib with rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This study aimed at evaluating the effect of rucaparib on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors and the safety of rucaparib with and without coadministration of rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. METHODS: Patients received single doses of oral rosuvastatin 20 mg (Arm A) or oral contraceptives ethinylestradiol 30 µg + levonorgestrel 150 µg (Arm B) on days 1 and 19 and continuous doses of rucaparib 600 mg BID from day 5 to 23. Serial blood samples were collected with and without rucaparib for pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (n = 18 each arm) were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of study drug. In the drug-drug interaction analysis (n = 15 each arm), the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of maximum concentration (Cmax) with and without rucaparib was 1.29 for rosuvastatin, 1.09 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.19 for levonorgestrel. GMR of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to last quantifiable measurement (AUC0-last) was 1.34 for rosuvastatin, 1.43 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.56 for levonorgestrel. There was no increase in frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) when rucaparib was given with either of the probe drugs. In both arms, most TEAEs were mild in severity and considered unrelated to study treatment. CONCLUSION: Rucaparib 600 mg BID weakly increased the plasma exposure to rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. Rucaparib safety profile when coadministered with rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives was consistent with that of rucaparib monotherapy. Dose adjustments of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives are not necessary when coadministered with rucaparib. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03954366; Date of registration May 17, 2019.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of rucaparib in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic impairment.

PURPOSE: The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib is approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; however, limited data are available on its use in patients with hepatic dysfunction. This study investigated whether hepatic impairment affects the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of rucaparib in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients with normal hepatic function or moderate hepatic impairment according to the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) criteria were enrolled and received a single oral dose of rucaparib 600 mg. Concentrations of rucaparib and its metabolite M324 in plasma and urine were measured. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between hepatic function groups, and safety and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled (n = 8 per group). Rucaparib maximum concentration (Cmax) was similar, while the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) was mildly higher in the moderate hepatic impairment group than in the normal control group (geometric mean ratio, 1.446 [90% CI 0.668-3.131]); similar trends were observed for M324. Eight (50%) patients experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 2 had normal hepatic function and 6 had moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate hepatic impairment showed mildly increased AUC0-inf for rucaparib compared to patients with normal hepatic function. Although more patients with moderate hepatic impairment experienced TEAEs, only 2 TEAEs were considered treatment related. These results suggest no starting dose adjustment is necessary for patients with moderate hepatic impairment; however, close safety monitoring is warranted.

Prediction of Transporter-Mediated Rosuvastatin Hepatic Uptake Clearance and Drug Interaction in Humans Using Proteomics-Informed REF Approach.

Suspended, plated, or sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes are routinely used for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) of transporter-mediated hepatic clearance (CL) of drugs. However, these hepatocyte models have been reported to underpredict transporter-mediated in vivo hepatic uptake CL (CL uptake,in vivo ) of some drugs. Therefore, we determined whether transporter-expressing cells (TECs) can accurately predict the CL uptake,in vivo of drugs. To do so, we determined the uptake CL (CL int,uptake,cells ) of rosuvastatin (RSV) by TECs (organic anion transporting polypeptides/Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide) and then scaled it to that in vivo by relative expression factor (REF) (the ratio of transporter abundance in human livers and TEC) determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics. Both the TEC and hepatocyte models did not meet our predefined success criteria of predicting within 2-fold the RSV CL uptake,in vivo value obtained from our positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, the TEC performed better than the hepatocyte models. Interestingly, using REF, TECs successfully predicted RSV CL int,uptake,hep obtained by the hepatocyte models, suggesting that the underprediction of RSV CL uptake,in vivo by TECs and hepatocytes is due to endogenous factor(s) not present in these in vitro models. Therefore, we determined whether inclusion of plasma (or albumin) in TEC uptake studies improved IVIVE of RSV CL uptake,in vivo It did, and our predictions were close to or just fell above our lower 2-fold acceptance boundary. Despite this success, additional studies are needed to improve transporter-mediated IVIVE of hepatic uptake CL of drugs. However, using REF and TEC, we successfully predicted the magnitude of PET-imaged inhibition of RSV CL uptake,in vivo by cyclosporine A. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We showed that the in vivo transporter-mediated hepatic uptake CL of rosuvastatin, determined by PET imaging, can be predicted (within 2-fold) from in vitro studies in transporter-expressing cells (TECs) (scaled using REF), but only when plasma proteins were included in the in vitro studies. This conclusion did not hold when plasma proteins were absent in the TEC or human hepatocyte studies. Thus, additional studies are needed to improve in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of transporter-mediated drug CL.

Evaluation of in vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion and assessment of drug-drug interaction of rucaparib, an orally potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor.

1. The absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination, and drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib was characterised in vitro.2. Rucaparib showed moderate cellular permeability, moderate human plasma protein binding (70.2%), and slow metabolism in human liver microsomes (HLMs). In HLMs, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and CYP3A contributed to the metabolism of rucaparib to its major metabolite M324 with estimated fractions of metabolism catalysed by CYP (fm,CYP) of 0.27 and 0.64, respectively. Rucaparib reversibly inhibited CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3As (IC50, 3.55, 12.9, 5.42, 41.6, and 17.2-22.9 µM [2 substrates], respectively), but not CYP2B6 or CYP2C8 (>190 µM). No time-dependent inhibition of any CYP was observed. In cultured human hepatocytes, rucaparib showed concentration-dependent induction of CYP1A2 mRNA and downregulation of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 mRNA. In transfected cells expressing drug transporters, rucaparib was a substrate for P-gp and BCRP, but not for OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1, OAT3, or OCT2. Rucaparib inhibited P-gp and BCRP (IC50, 169 and 55 µM, respectively) and slightly inhibited OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1, and OAT3 (66%, 58%, 58%, and 42% inhibition, respectively) at 300 µM. Rucaparib inhibited OCT1, OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2-K (IC50, 4.3, 31, 0.63, and 0.19 µM, respectively).3. DDI risk assessment using static models suggested potential CYP-related DDIs, with rucaparib as a perpetrator. Caution is advised when co-administering rucaparib with sensitive substrates of MATEs, OCT1, and OCT2.

Evaluation of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of [14C]-rucaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Rucaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, is licensed for use in recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. We characterized the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of rucaparib in 6 patients with advanced solid tumors following a single oral dose of [14C]-rucaparib 600 mg (≈140 µCi). Total radioactivity (TRA) in blood, plasma, urine, and feces was measured using liquid scintillation counting. Unchanged rucaparib concentrations in plasma were determined using validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Maximum concentration (Cmax) of TRA and unchanged rucaparib in plasma was 880 ng Eq/mL and 428 ng/mL, respectively, at approximately 4 h post dose; terminal half-life was >25 h for both TRA and rucaparib. The plasma TRA-time profile was parallel to yet higher than that of rucaparib, suggesting the presence of metabolites in plasma. Mean blood:plasma ratio of radioactivity was 1.0 for Cmax and 0.8 for area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity. Mean postdose recovery of TRA was 89.3% over 12 days (71.9% in feces; 17.4% in urine). Unchanged rucaparib and M324 (oxidative metabolite) were the major components in plasma, contributing to 64.0% and 18.6% of plasma radioactivity, respectively. Rucaparib and M324 were the major rucaparib-related components (each ≈7.6% of dose) in urine, whereas rucaparib was the predominant component (63.9% of dose) in feces. The high fecal recovery of unchanged rucaparib could be attributed to hepatic excretion and/or incomplete oral absorption. Overall, these data suggest that rucaparib is eliminated through multiple pathways, including metabolism and renal and biliary excretion.

Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of [11 C]Rosuvastatin Hepatic Concentrations and Hepatobiliary Transport in Humans in the Absence and Presence of Cyclosporin A.

Using positron emission tomography imaging, we determined the hepatic concentrations and hepatobiliary transport of [11 C]rosuvastatin (RSV; i.v. injection) in the absence (n = 6) and presence (n = 4 of 6) of cyclosporin A (CsA; i.v. infusion) following a therapeutic dose of unlabeled RSV (5 mg, p.o.) in healthy human volunteers. The sinusoidal uptake, sinusoidal efflux, and biliary efflux clearance (CL; mL/minute) of [11 C]RSV, estimated through compartment modeling were 1,205.6 ± 384.8, 16.2 ± 11.2, and 5.1 ± 1.8, respectively (n = 6). CsA (blood concentration: 2.77 ± 0.24 µM), an organic-anion-transporting polypeptide, Na+ -taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide, and breast cancer resistance protein inhibitor increased [11 C]RSV systemic blood exposure (45%; P < 0.05), reduced its biliary efflux CL (52%; P < 0.05) and hepatic uptake (25%; P > 0.05) but did not affect its distribution into the kidneys. CsA increased plasma concentrations of coproporphyrin I and III and total bilirubin by 297 ± 69%, 384 ± 102%, and 81 ± 39%, respectively (P < 0.05). These data can be used in the future to verify predictions of hepatic concentrations and hepatobiliary transport of RSV.

A Comparison of Total and Plasma Membrane Abundance of Transporters in Suspended, Plated, Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes Versus Human Liver Tissue Using Quantitative Targeted Proteomics and Cell Surface Biotinylation.

Suspended (SH), plated (PH), and sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (SCH) are commonly used models to predict in vivo transporter-mediated hepatic uptake (SH or PH) or biliary (SCH) clearance of drugs. When doing so, the total and the plasma membrane abundance (PMA) of transporter are assumed not to differ between hepatocytes and liver tissue (LT). This assumption has never been tested. In this study, we tested this assumption by measuring the total and PMA of the transporters in human hepatocyte models versus LT (total only) from which they were isolated. Total abundance of OATP1B1/2B1/1B3, OCT1, and OAT2 was not significantly different between the hepatocytes and LT. The same was true for the PMA of these transporters across the hepatocyte models. In contrast, total abundance of the sinusoidal efflux transporter, MRP3, and the canalicular efflux transporters, MRP2 and P-gp, was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in SCH versus LT. Of the transporters tested, only the percentage of PMA of OATP1B1, P-gp, and MRP3, in SCH (82.8% ± 7.3%, 57.5% ± 10.9%, 69.3% ± 5.7%) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than in SH (73.3% ± 6.4%, 27.4% ± 6.4%, 53.6% ± 4.1%). If the transporters measured in the plasma membrane are functional and the PMA in SH is representative of that in LT, these data suggest that SH, PH, and SCH will result in equal prediction of hepatic uptake clearance of drugs mediated by the transporters tested above. However, SCH will predict higher sinusoidal efflux and biliary clearance of drugs if the change in PMA of these transporters is not taken into consideration.

Comparison of uptake transporter functions in hepatocytes in different species to determine the optimal model for evaluating drug transporter activities in humans.

A thorough understanding of species-dependent differences in hepatic uptake transporters is critical for predicting human pharmacokinetics (PKs) from preclinical data. In this study, the activities of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP/Oatp), organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1/Oct1), and sodium-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP/Ntcp) in cultured rat, dog, monkey and human hepatocytes were compared. The activities of hepatic uptake transporters were evaluated with respect to culture duration, substrate and species-dependent differences in hepatocytes. Longer culture duration reduced hepatic uptake transporter activities across species except for Oatp and Ntcp in rats. Comparable apparent Michaelis-Menten constant (Km,app) values in hepatocytes were observed across species for atorvastatin, estradiol-17ß-glucuronide and metformin. The Km,app values for rosuvastatin and taurocholate were significantly different across species. Rat hepatocytes exhibited the highest Oatp percentage of uptake transporter-mediated permeation clearance (PSinf,act) while no difference in %PSinf,act of probe substrates were observed across species. The in vitro hepatocyte inhibition data in rats, monkeys and humans provided reasonable predictions of in vivo drug-drug interaction (DDIs) between atorvastatin/rosuvastatin and rifampin. These findings suggested that using human hepatocytes with a short culture time is the most robust preclinical model for predicting DDIs for compounds exhibiting active hepatic uptake in humans.

Clinical Probes and Endogenous Biomarkers as Substrates for Transporter Drug-Drug Interaction Evaluation: Perspectives From the International Transporter Consortium.

Drug transporters can govern the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of substrate drugs and endogenous substances. Investigations to examine their potential impact to pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are an integral part of the risk assessment in drug development. To evaluate a new molecular entity as a potential perpetrator of transporters, use of well characterized and/or clinically relevant probe substrates with good selectivity and sensitivity are critical for robust clinical DDI assessment that could inform DDI management strategy in the product labeling. The availability of endogenous biomarkers to monitor transporter-mediated DDIs in early phases of clinical investigations would greatly benefit downstream clinical plans. This article reviews the state-of-the-art in transporter clinical probe drugs and emerging biomarkers, including current challenges and limitations, delineates methods and workflows to identify and validate novel endogenous biomarkers to support clinical DDI evaluations, and proposes how these probe drugs or biomarkers could be used in drug development.

Abundance of Phase 1 and 2 Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in Alcoholic and Hepatitis C Cirrhotic Livers: A Quantitative Targeted Proteomics Study.

To predict the impact of liver cirrhosis on hepatic drug clearance using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, we compared the protein abundance of various phase 1 and phase 2 drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) in S9 fractions of alcoholic (n = 27) or hepatitis C (HCV, n = 30) cirrhotic versus noncirrhotic (control) livers (n = 25). The S9 total protein content was significantly lower in alcoholic or HCV cirrhotic versus control livers (i.e., 38.3 ± 8.3, 32.3 ± 12.8, vs. 51.1 ± 20.7 mg/g liver, respectively). In general, alcoholic cirrhosis was associated with a larger decrease in the DME abundance than HCV cirrhosis; however, only the abundance of UGT1A4, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)1A, and ADH1B was significantly lower in alcoholic versus HCV cirrhotic livers. When normalized to per gram of tissue, the abundance of nine DMEs (UGT1A6, UGT1A4, CYP3A4, UGT2B7, CYP1A2, ADH1A, ADH1B, aldehyde oxidase (AOX)1, and carboxylesterase (CES)1) in alcoholic cirrhosis and five DMEs (UGT1A6, UGT1A4, CYP3A4, UGT2B7, and CYP1A2) in HCV cirrhosis was <25% of that in control livers. The abundance of most DMEs in cirrhotic livers was 25% to 50% of control livers. CES2 abundance was not affected by cirrhosis. Integration of UGT2B7 abundance in cirrhotic livers into the liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh C) model of Simcyp improved the prediction of zidovudine and morphine PK in subjects with Child Pugh C liver cirrhosis. These data demonstrate that protein abundance data, combined with PBPK modeling and simulation, can be a powerful tool to predict drug disposition in special populations.

Preclinical absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and pharmacokinetics of a novel selective inhibitor of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP).

1. Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) plays an important role in drug absorption, distribution and excretion. It is challenging to evaluate BCRP functions in preclinical models because commonly used BCRP inhibitors are nonspecific or unstable in animal plasma. 2. In this work, in vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination (ADME) assays and pharmacokinetic (PK) experiments in Bcrp knockout (KO) (Abcg2-/-) and wild-type (WT) FVB mice and Wistar rats were conducted to characterize the preclinical properties of a novel selective BCRP inhibitor (ML753286, a Ko143 analog). 3. ML753286 is a potent inhibitor for BCRP, but not for P-glycoprotein (P-gp), organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) or major cytochrome P450s (CYPs). It has high permeability, but is not an efflux transporter substrate. ML753286 has low to medium clearance in rodent and human liver S9 fractions, and is stable in plasma cross species. Bcrp inhibition affects oral absorption and clearance of sulfasalazine in rodents. A single dose of ML753286 at 50-300 mg/kg orally, and at 20 mg/kg intravenously or 25 mg/kg orally inhibits Bcrp functions in mice and rats, respectively. 4. These findings confirm that ML753286 is a useful selective inhibitor to evaluate BCRP/Bcrp activity in vitro and in rodent model systems.

Efflux transporter breast cancer resistance protein dominantly expresses on the membrane of red blood cells, hinders partitioning of its substrates into the cells, and alters drug-drug interaction profiles.

1. Red blood cell (RBC) partitioning is important in determining pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a compound; however, active transport across RBC membranes is not well understood, particularly without transporter-related cell membrane proteomics data. 2. In this study, we quantified breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/Bcrp) and MDR1/P-glycoprotein (P-gp) protein expression in RBCs from humans, monkeys, dogs, rats and mice using nanoLC/MS/MS, and evaluated their effect on RBC partitioning and plasma exposure of their substrates. BCRP-specific substrate Cpd-1 and MDR1-specific substrate Cpd-2 were characterized using Caco-2 Transwell® system and then administered to Bcrp or P-gp knockout mice. 3. The quantification revealed BCRP/Bcrp but not MDR1/P-gp to be highly expressed on RBC membranes. The knockout mouse study indicated BCRP/Bcrp pumps the substrate out of RBCs, lowering its partitioning and thus preventing binding to intracellular targets. This result was supported by a Cpd-1 and Bcrp inhibitor ML753286 drug-drug interaction (DDI) study in mice. Because of enhanced partitioning of Cpd-1 into RBCs after BCRP/Bcrp inhibition, Cpd-1 plasma concentration changed much less extent with genetic or chemical knockout of Bcrp albeit marked blood concentration increase, suggesting less DDI effect. 4. This finding is fundamentally meaningful to RBC partitioning, pharmacokinetics and DDI studies of BCRP-specific substrates.

Transporter Expression in Noncancerous and Cancerous Liver Tissue from Donors with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Chronic Hepatitis C Infection Quantified by LC-MS/MS Proteomics.

Protein expression of major hepatobiliary drug transporters (NTCP, OATPs, OCT1, BSEP, BCRP, MATE1, MRPs, and P-gp) in cancerous (C, n = 8) and adjacent noncancerous (NC, n = 33) liver tissues obtained from patients with chronic hepatitis C with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCV-HCC) were quantified by LC-MS/MS proteomics. Herein, we compare our results with our previous data from noninfected, noncirrhotic (control, n = 36) and HCV-cirrhotic (n = 30) livers. The amount of membrane protein yielded from NC and C HCV-HCC tissues decreased (31%, 67%) relative to control livers. In comparison with control livers, with the exception of NTCP, MRP2, and MATE1, transporter expression decreased in NC (38%-76%) and C (56%-96%) HCV-HCC tissues. In NC HCV-HCC tissues, NTCP expression increased (113%), MATE1 expression decreased (58%), and MRP2 expression was unchanged relative to control livers. In C HCV-HCC tissues, NTCP and MRP2 expression decreased (63%, 56%) and MATE1 expression was unchanged relative to control livers. Compared with HCV-cirrhotic livers, aside from NTCP, OCT1, BSEP, and MRP2, transporter expression decreased in NC (41%-71%) and C (54%-89%) HCV-HCC tissues. In NC HCV-HCC tissues, NTCP and MRP2 expression increased (362%, 142%), whereas OCT1 and BSEP expression was unchanged. In C HCV-HCC tissues, OCT1 and BSEP expression decreased (90%, 80%) relative to HCV-cirrhotic livers, whereas NTCP and MRP2 expression was unchanged. Expression of OATP2B1, BSEP, MRP2, and MRP3 decreased (56%-72%) in C HCV-HCC tissues in comparison with matched NC tissues (n = 8), but the expression of other transporters was unchanged. These data will be helpful in the future to predict transporter-mediated hepatocellular drug concentrations in patients with HCV-HCC.

Prediction of Hepatic Efflux Transporter-Mediated Drug Interactions: When Is it Optimal to Measure Intracellular Unbound Fraction of Inhibitors?

The intracellular unbound inhibitor concentration ([I]unbound,cell) is the most relevant concentration for predicting the inhibition of hepatic efflux transporters. However, the intracellular unbound fraction of inhibitor in hepatocytes (fu,cell,inhibitor) is not routinely determined. Studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of measuring fu,cell,inhibitor and using [I]unbound,cell versus intracellular total inhibitor concentration ([I]total,cell) when predicting inhibitory effects. This study examined the benefit of using [I]unbound,cell to predict hepatocellular bile acid disposition. Cellular total concentrations of taurocholate ([TCA]total,cell), a prototypical bile acid, were simulated using pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes. The effect of various theoretical inhibitors was simulated by varying ([I]total,cell/ half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50]) values. In addition, the fold change was calculated as the simulated [TCA]total,cell when fu,cell,inhibitor = 1 divided by the simulated [TCA]total,cell when fu,cell,inhibitor = 0.5-0.01. The lowest ([I]total,cell/IC50) value leading to a >2-fold change in [TCA]total,cell was chosen as a cutoff, and a framework was developed to categorize risk inhibitors for which the measurement of fu,cell,inhibitor is optimal. Fifteen compounds were categorized, 5 of which were compared with experimental observations. Future work is needed to evaluate this framework based on additional experimental data. In conclusion, the benefit of measuring fu,cell,inhibitor to predict hepatic efflux transporter-mediated drug-bile acid interactions can be determined a priori.

In Vitro Drug-Induced Liver Injury Prediction: Criteria Optimization of Efflux Transporter IC50 and Physicochemical Properties.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a severe drug adverse response, which cannot always be reliably predicted in preclinical or clinical studies. Lack of observation of DILI during preclinical and clinical drug development has led to DILI being a leading cause of drug withdrawal from the market. As DILI is potentially fatal, pharmaceutical companies have been developing in vitro tools to screen for potential liver injury. Screens for physicochemical properties, mitochondrial function, and transport protein inhibition have all been employed to varying degrees of success. In vitro inhibition of the bile salt export pump (BSEP) has become a major risk factor for in vivo DILI predictions, yet discrepancies exist in which methods to use and the extent to which BSEP inhibition predicts clinical DILI. The presented work focuses on optimizing DILI predictions by comparing BSEP inhibition via the membrane vesicle assay and the hepatocyte-based BSEPcyte assay, as well as dual and triple liabilities. BSEP transport inhibition of taurcholic acids and glycocholic acids were similar for up to 29 drugs tested, in both the vesicle and hepatocyte-based assays. Positive and negative DILI predictions were optimized at a 50-µM cutoff value for 50 drugs using both NIH Livertox and PharmaPendium databases. Additionally, dual inhibition of BSEP and other efflux transporters (multidrug resistance-associated protein [MRP]2, MRP3, or MRP4) provided no observable predictive benefit compared with BSEP inhibition alone. Eighty-five percent of drugs with high molecular weight (>600 Da), high cLogP (>3), or a daily dose >100 mg and BSEP inhibition were associated with DILI. Triple liability of BSEP inhibition, high molecular weight, and high cLogP attained a 100% positive prediction rate.

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) Alters Bile Acid Homeostasis in Rats and Dogs: A Potential Cause of Drug Induced Liver Injury.

Fasiglifam (TAK-875), a Free Fatty Acid Receptor 1 (FFAR1) agonist in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, was voluntarily terminated in phase 3 due to adverse liver effects. A mechanistic investigation described in this manuscript focused on the inhibition of bile acid (BA) transporters as a driver of the liver findings. TAK-875 was an in vitro inhibitor of multiple influx (NTCP and OATPs) and efflux (BSEP and MRPs) hepatobiliary BA transporters at micromolar concentrations. Repeat dose studies determined that TAK-875 caused a dose-dependent increase in serum total BA in rats and dogs. Additionally, there were dose-dependent increases in both unconjugated and conjugated individual BAs in both species. Rats had an increase in serum markers of liver injury without correlative microscopic signs of tissue damage. Two of 6 dogs that received the highest dose of TAK-875 developed liver injury with clinical pathology changes, and by microscopic analysis had portal granulomatous inflammation with neutrophils around a crystalline deposition. The BA composition of dog bile also significantly changed in a dose-dependent manner following TAK-875 administration. At the highest dose, levels of taurocholic acid were 50% greater than in controls with a corresponding 50% decrease in taurochenodeoxycholic acid. Transporter inhibition by TAK-875 may cause liver injury in dogs through altered bile BA composition characteristics, as evidenced by crystalline deposition, likely composed of test article, in the bile duct. In conclusion, a combination of in vitro and in vivo evidence suggests that BA transporter inhibition could contribute to TAK-875-mediated liver injury in dogs.

Utilizing In Vitro Dissolution-Permeation Chamber for the Quantitative Prediction of pH-Dependent Drug-Drug Interactions with Acid-Reducing Agents: a Comparison with Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

For many orally administered basic drugs with pH-dependent solubility, concurrent administration with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) can significantly impair their absorption and exposure. In this study, pH-dependent drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction methods, including in vitro dissolution-permeation chamber (IVDP) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, were evaluated for their ability to quantitatively predict the clinical DDI observations using 11 drugs with known clinical pH-dependent DDI data. The data generated by IVDP, which consists of a gastrointestinal compartment and a systemic compartment separated by a biomimic membrane, significantly correlated with the clinical DDI observations. The gastrointestinal compartment AUC ratio showed strong correlation with clinical AUC ratio (R=0.72 and P=0.0056), and systemic compartment AUC ratio showed strong correlation with clinical Cmax ratio (R=0.91 and P=0.0003). PBPK models were also developed for the 11 test compounds. The simulations showed that the predictions from PBPK model with experimentally measured parameters significantly correlated with the clinical DDI observations. Future studies are needed to evaluate predictability of Z-factor-based PBPK models for pH-dependent DDI. Overall, these data suggested that the severity of pH-dependent DDI can be predicted by in vitro and in silico methods. Proper utilization of these methods before clinical DDI studies could allow adequate anticipation of pH-dependent DDI, which helps with minimizing pharmacokinetic variation in clinical studies and ensuring every patient with life-threatening diseases receives full benefit of the therapy.