ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to prospectively compare an autologous duraplasty in situ technique (IS group) with the synthetic dural graft duraplasty (SDG group) to clarify the effectiveness and superiority of the former in the treatment of patients with Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-I). METHOD: 29 patients with CM-I were randomly assigned to either IS or SDG group. In both groups, a dissection from the occipital bone was performed. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. The two duraplasty methods were compared in terms of surgical factors and complications. Data analysis was done for the baseline material, the neurological outcome and MRI-documented syrinx size at the 6 month follow-up. RESULT: 29 patients were enrolled in this study, 14 in the IS group and 15 in the SDG group. The results showed no significant difference in operation time (P = 0.916), amount of bleeding (P = 0.120), operation complications, hospitalization time (P = 0.854) and prognosis between the two groups. The hospitalization cost of IS group was 15,125 yuan less than that of SDG group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The autogenous duraplasty in situ technique is a novel, simple, effective and economical surgical management for patients with CM-I.
