The occurrence of fetal microchimeric cells in endometrial tissues is a very common phenomenon in benign uterine disorders, and the lower prevalence of fetal microchimerism is associated with better uterine cancer prognoses.

This is the first study carried out to describe the role of fetal microchimerism (FM) in the pathogenesis of uterine cancer. The prevalence and concentration of male fetal microchimeric cells (FMCs) were examined in endometrial tissues in relation to subtypes of uterine cancer, and the histological grade and stage of the tumor. FM occurrence was analyzed in relation to risk factors, including hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, age at cancer diagnosis, and patient pregnancy history. The prevalence and concentration of FMCs were examined in endometrial tissues using real-time polymerase chain reaction, SRY and ß-globin sequences as markers for male fetal FMCs and total DNA. The studied group involved 47 type 1 endometrial cancers, 28 type 2 endometrial cancers, and 41 benign uterine diseases. While the prevalence of FM was decreased only in type 1 endometrial cancer, compared with benign uterine disorders (38.3% vs.70.7%; odds ratio [OR]=0.257, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.105 to 0.628, p=0.003), FMC concentrations did not differ within examined groups. The lower FM prevalence was detected in low-grade (grade 1 and grade 2) endometrioid cancer (38.3% vs. 70.7%, OR=0.256, 95% CI: 0.105 to 0.627, p=0.003) and in FIGO 1 tumors (40.7% vs. 70.7%, OR=0.285, 95% CI: 0.120 to 0.675, p=0.004). No correlation between FM prevalence or FMC concentrations and risk factors was demonstrated. A lower prevalence of male FM seemed to be associated with better prognoses in uterine cancer based on tumor subtype, histological grade, and stage of the tumor.

heterogeneity of dna ploidy in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of different tissue samples obtained during diagnosis and treatment.

AIM: Comparison of DNA ploidy status of different tumour tissue samples (fresh/frozen vs. paraffin-embedded; curettage vs. hysterectomy samples) obtained during diagnosis and treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DNA ploidy status and conventional prognostic parameters were recorded for 74 patients with endometrial carcinoma prospectively. RESULTS: In 59 (79.7%) patients the DNA status was described as diploid in all analyzed tissue samples. The remaining 15 (20.3%) cases were described as DNA aneuploid in at least one of the corresponding tissue samples. The concordance between DNA ploidy status in fresh vs. paraffin-embedded hysterectomy samples as well as curettage vs. hysterectomy paraffin-embedded samples was high (kappa coefficient κ=0.6348, 95% confidence interval CI=0.3673-0.9023, and p=0.6408, 95% CI=0.3977-0.8838), however, the methods are not interchangeable. CONCLUSION: The DNA ploidy discordance observed in our study group seems to document intratumoral heterogeneity that should be expected when applying DNA ploidy status in the clinical management of endometrial carcinoma.